• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Ronstang saves day....Roller 5.OOOOOHHHH conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65fastback2+2
  • Start date Start date Aug 22, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Aug 22, 2004
#1
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #1
Wednesday: I arrive at 8am sharp. Today's planned events: Cam, lifters, intake, carb. Rip it all apart, slide the cam out. We noticed that the cam bearings were a lil worn, but we thought it might be ok. Slide new cam in and well, the cam just falls in. No effort necessary because the cam bearings were worn so far you could take the came and ring the motor like a bell. Bing Bing! "everybody ashore!!!" Now theres a choice to be made. Pull the motor and do cam bearings, OR get another short block. After all, worn cam bearings, lifter ticking, no oil pressure and hugely leaking rear main, replacing cam bearings just wont do it , so we opt for the short block. So we go pick up a fresh rebuilt 86 Roller 5.0 0.060 over, a set of fresh rebuilt E6 heads and a descent set of E7 heads. Find the dog bones and spider for the roller stuff. Drive 1.5 hours to pick up the proper heavier imbalance flywheel to mate the Roller motor to the C4. While there Ron's buddy gave me a 95 Cobra roller cam and a complete set up roller lifters and pushrods outta a 90 tbird. Finish pulling motor out, day is over. 15 hour day

Thursday: Mainly a cleaning day. Clean all the lifters and heads and take the old stuff off the old motor and clean it to go on the new motor which is now sitting on an engine stand. Pretty much got everything for the roller motor except the steel distributor gear. The problem with this is, the late model gears are .531 (i think, bigger lol)diameter and the early model is .461 shaft (again, i think, smaller) diameter. End up calling the huge Ford place in Houston after spending hours at o'reilley trying to figure it out to no avail. So now we got the gear thing figured out. 14 hour day

Friday: go get gear and start assembly of motor. clean every bolt and start building roller motor. We used the early 302 oil pan, valve cover gaskets, timing chain cover, waterpump. Check 50 ounce balancer and old pulleys on the engine stand. They wont line up. Early model 302's use a 28 ounce imbalance which is bigger, plus the 50 ounce balancer has a cast in spacer. Ron takes the balancer to a buddys machine shop and grinds off the spacer. Makes a 3/16" spacer to put on the water pump up top to push the water pump pully out a bit. It all lines up . Bolt it all up, drop it in the car slowwwlllly. Get motor in and fight with the motor mounts. Day ends with block, heads, and intake all bolted in the car and to the tranny. 18 hour day

Saturday: Start putting front of the motor on when its evident, the alternator nor power steering pump are going to bolt to this motor. Apparantly the previous owner ghettoed it to work on the early 302. Get all this worked out eventually, wire everything up put everything else back on and start it up. CLANK CLANK CLANK! motor fires and runs fine but is making a HUGE awful sounding noise. Flywheel weight was hitting the tranny cover plate. Fix that, start it up, clank clank clank. Water pump was apparantly hit too much, put a new one on. clank clank clank, passenger side timing pointer is hitting the balancer so we revert to the original driver side pointer. start it up and purrrrrrrrrrr. best sound you ever heard. adjust it, put the hood on put all the old parts in my parents truck and im off to home again. 18 hour day.

I now have this:

86 Roller 5.0 0.060 short block
E7 heads
95 Cobra roller cam
90 Tbird pushrods and roller lifters
67 oil pan, timing chaing cover, water pump, valve cover gaskets
new 600 cfm edelbrock carb
new performer intake
original small diameter shaft distributor with the correct steel cam gear

Things needed for the swap:

Proper thicker flywheel with the thicker imbalance
50 ounce balancer (either the special ford one, or shave the front spacer off another one)
Steel small diameter distributor cam gear
351W spark plug firing order
New spark plugs (smaller diameter than early model 302)

And you need a whole lotta patience

p.s. im sure if i said something wrong, ron will correct it.

Many thanks to Ronstang who knew what he was doing, I tried my best as grunt work and tool hander
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Aug 22, 2004
#2
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #2
Glad to hear it only took you a few days I stil lhave yet to fire my motor up but mine is more a money thing. Any who I have a friend like that. He turns the wrench most of the time and I change the station on the radio and hold things lol.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#3
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #3
cobra roller cam is garbage to say the least. Best to keep a stock HO one.

86 block I hope it's notched with valve relieves since stock ones didn't.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#4
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #4
Fostang said:
cobra roller cam is garbage to say the least. Best to keep a stock HO one.

86 block I hope it's notched with valve relieves since stock ones didn't.
Click to expand...
A 95 Cobra cam is identical to the 95 HO cam....there is no difference (plus the important thing was FREE) and the pistons were notched as this was a rebuilt shortblock form one of the local rebuilder shops.

And BTW Jason......Dawnstang wants to know why you didn't mention her feeding you and providing you with a clean bed for for 4 days.....I told her this is a car forum and such details are unimportant.
 

SnakeStang65

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
160
0
0
Jasper, Indiana
Aug 22, 2004
#5
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #5
Ronstang is great for things like this. I can always count on him for help during major projects like what you mentioned. I remember late nights banging on my floorboards to make room for the Tremmec cross member and having the neighbor across the street come and yell at us...

Ah.. Those were the days...

Thanks again Ron...

John
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Aug 22, 2004
#6
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #6
Ronstang said:
A 95 Cobra cam is identical to the 95 HO cam....there is no difference (plus the important thing was FREE) and the pistons were notched as this was a rebuilt shortblock form one of the local rebuilder shops.

And BTW Jason......Dawnstang wants to know why you didn't mention her feeding you and providing you with a clean bed for for 4 days.....I told her this is a car forum and such details are unimportant.
Click to expand...

ya, i would think they put a HO cam in a cobra, atleast I would hope so since a cobra is a high output motor lol.

And yes, room and board was wonderful, except for the sugarless tea , oh and a word for the dumb, if you ever want Ron's help, DONT and I repeat DONT ask for it during the olympics
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#7
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #7
right.......If you guys say so
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Aug 22, 2004
#8
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #8
Fostang said:
right.......If you guys say so
Click to expand...

well im curious, if you say it isnt, do you got duration numbers?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#9
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #9
Don't listen to him Jason. He can't provide a reliable source because there isn't one. SVT doesn't even list the cam specs because they are the same as the GT. The cam has the HO mark on the end just like the regular GT because it is the same cam. This argument has been raging for years but no one who claims the cam is different can provide reliable credible data to back up their claim.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#10
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #10
Yeah listen to him because he has the cam specs.

Good luck Better than a T bird cam oh wait it's basicly the same other than the firing order. oooppsss.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#11
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #11
marks what marks?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#12
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #12
I don't have the cams specs, never claimed that I did but I can look up the HO camspecs if you like but that proves nothing. If you have a reliable source that shows the cam specs for the HO and the Cobra cams that can be verified then please share them, if not then stop spreading misinformation.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Aug 22, 2004
#13
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #13
Ronstang said:
I don't have the cams specs, never claimed that I did but I can look up the HO camspecs if you like but that proves nothing. If you have a reliable source that shows the cam specs for the HO and the Cobra cams that can be verified then please share them, if not then stop spreading misinformation.
Click to expand...

dont worry ron, im happy with how it is even if it is a worse cam, i was just curious for informations sake.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#14
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #14
I know people that have checked them and to me they are reliable sources but to others that don't know what it is they do may not believe them.

One of these gentlemen is dubbed mr. valve events. Best Cam installer around.

It is true though the degree tolerances was great as much of 13 degrees in same HO cams and to rely on just one came is foolish.

So he has tested several different ones and from time and time again the cobra ones come up shorter than HO cams.

BTW install it 4 degrees retarded.
Really helps out the power band. Especially if you have aftermarket heads.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#15
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #15
Yeah it's not like that bad though but if I had the choice i'd go with the HO cam.

The HO cam is really good and the cam narrowly favors exhaust also so thats a plus.

If I was building a nice street beast it would involve a stock HO cam AFR heads and a tubular gt40 intake with ported lower. Or stealth carb intake.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#16
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #16
That may be true, I am not going to dispute what you say but it is not proof in any way shape of form. It really doesn't matter anyway as the cam was free and that is what he has. If I cared I would go out in the garage and get the degre wheel out and verify it myself....once again no provable source. I could call the head engineer at Ford for the answer but I can't prove that either. Like I said, this argument has been raging for years but noone seems to be able to provide any reliable proof.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 22, 2004
#17
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #17
Yeah you need a little more things than just a degree wheel but just install it 4 degrees retarded.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 23, 2004
#18
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #18
I can measure every event of the cam with a degree wheel, fake lifter, a dial indicator, and some knowledge. It would be rather easy to compare two camshafts if I really cared and the cam is already installed so your "4 degrees retarded" suggestion is a little late, but I wouldn't do it anyway without a source more reliable than some anonymous internet person unless you can provide a reliable source that backs up your info.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Aug 23, 2004
#19
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #19
Oh wow some people are so hard headed.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 23, 2004
#20
  • Aug 23, 2004
  • #20
Fostang said:
Oh wow some people are so hard headed.
Click to expand...
I guess you are referring to yourself?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
251
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
883
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
284
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
559
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?