• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

RPM II vs RPM

  • Thread starter Thread starter kswitch
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2004
K

kswitch

New Member
Aug 18, 2004
11
0
0
Dec 20, 2004
#1
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #1
I was just wondering if anyone here has had both of these intakes Edelbrock's rpm and Edelbrocks Rpm II. Im looking into getting the rpm II because of the power band difference from the performer just wanted to make sure before i burn some of my money lol. Also wondering which would be best for a S/C and is a 70mm tb the best for it? Thx for your time you guys couple of posts in the past have helped me
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Dec 20, 2004
#2
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #2
I'm curious too what the benefits of an RPM II are, or why anyone would go with the RPM if buying either now.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 20, 2004
#3
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #3
Whats your combo? Whats your plans? Assuming a stock engine, a performer is a better choice. I prefer 70-75mm tb's depending on what the manifold opening is. If its smaller, dremel it open to fit the bigger tb's. If m guess is correct as to where your looking to go, the 70mm should be enough.
 
W

wcorin

New Member
Mar 5, 2004
6
0
0
Wilkesboro, NC
Dec 20, 2004
#4
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #4
RPM II has a completely different design. the only advanage to having the RPM is that the lower is the same as the performer so you could switch between the performer and the RPM by just changing the upper.
I like the RPM II, it has decent low end power and above 3.5k it really comes alive. I have a 93 coupe so its not a heavy car. I think the RPM II would be a better choice for N/A or for a Blower car. But like grn92lx said if your car has stock heads the performer intake would be better. My times are int the sig. no dyno numbers yet and my car is smog legal with ac and all options.

Wesley
 
W

wcorin

New Member
Mar 5, 2004
6
0
0
Wilkesboro, NC
Dec 20, 2004
#5
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #5
sorry, was not in the sig when I posted this.

Wesley
 
A

Allmotor95

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
29
0
0
Dec 20, 2004
#6
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #6
I run the RPM II and it has work wonders for me, and BTW the lower is not the same as the RPM the runners are much bigger. In fact when I first purchased my II they had no upper plenum gaskets and I had to trim an RPM one with a blade to make it fit.

I'm going to sell mine if you want to make an offer and also the opening is about 75MM stock, 90 in mine, to match my custom elbow, which is 90mm. IT was made for my 80mm TB but bigger for when I try a 90TB. Again every combo is different but I'm sure you won't regret the II, I ran it on my P combo with great results. I'm going with a Victor!!!!!!!!!!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 20, 2004
#7
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #7
Allmotor95 said:
I run the RPM II and it has work wonders for me, and BTW the lower is not the same as the RPM the runners are much bigger. In fact when I first purchased my II they had no upper plenum gaskets and I had to trim an RPM one with a blade to make it fit.

I'm going to sell mine if you want to make an offer and also the opening is about 75MM stock, 90 in mine, to match my custom elbow, which is 90mm. IT was made for my 80mm TB but bigger for when I try a 90TB. Again every combo is different but I'm sure you won't regret the II, I ran it on my P combo with great results. I'm going with a Victor!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

How much for the RPM II intake? Knowing that you dremeled open the inlet is a plus since I run a 75mm TB. Hmm, if I buy yours I could try a 90mm TB, hmm. PM me a price, please. All I would need to buy is gaskets, right?

Mike
 
A

AIRRIDE

New Member
Nov 14, 2004
33
0
0
Ontario,Canada
Dec 20, 2004
#8
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #8
Allmotor95 said:
I run the RPM II and it has work wonders for me, and BTW the lower is not the same as the RPM the runners are much bigger. In fact when I first purchased my II they had no upper plenum gaskets and I had to trim an RPM one with a blade to make it fit.

I'm going to sell mine if you want to make an offer and also the opening is about 75MM stock, 90 in mine, to match my custom elbow, which is 90mm. IT was made for my 80mm TB but bigger for when I try a 90TB. Again every combo is different but I'm sure you won't regret the II, I ran it on my P combo with great results. I'm going with a Victor!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
what year car did you run the rpm II is it a 94-95GT,if so did it clear the stock hood,the reason i ask is that I just got the rpmII intake and im running a stock hood wanted to know if it would clear.thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
247
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
727
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
694
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
743
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?