• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

RPM or RPMII ?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad Animal
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2004
B

Bad Animal

Founding Member
Nov 18, 2000
97
0
0
Toledo, OH
Feb 18, 2004
#1
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #1
My combo is a 306 with afr 165 with a custom cam (550/560), 70mm tb, 75maf, 30# injectors, 3.73's, TKO tranny, 1 3/4 longtubes. What intake do you guys recommend?? The RPM or the RPMII?? Also what kind of fuel pressure do you recommend I start with??? It was running rich at 35#'s!!!! Thanks in advance
 

Mike86Stang

Advanced Member
Apr 11, 2000
10,296
0
77
Red Lion, PA
Feb 18, 2004
#2
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #2
My first question is what RPM are you going to be spinning to?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 18, 2004
#3
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #3
The standard RPM would be a better match to the 165's. I'm just curious as to why you went as big as 1 3/4 with your longtubes though. A set of 1 5/8 would have been better for street use with the amount of air the heads and intake would flow. On the other hand, if you're wanting to see some RPM with the combo, I would suggest the RPM II, but would question why you limited your head selection to your use of 165's instead of the 185's?
 
B

Bad Animal

Founding Member
Nov 18, 2000
97
0
0
Toledo, OH
Feb 18, 2004
#4
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #4
the 185's and 165's share the same exhaust ports. I don't care about street use!! I felt the 185's would be major overkill on a 306. And a 1 5/8 inch header won't even cover the exhaust port on these heads!! THe 165's are producing as much a 500 hp with a naturally aspirated combo. The motor will be shifted at approximately 6500 RPM.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Feb 18, 2004
#5
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #5
hmm

my 1 5/8s work just fine on my 165's


back to your question, what rpm is the cam gonna peak at?

that will decide which intake
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 18, 2004
#6
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #6
Bad Animal said:
the 185's and 165's share the same exhaust ports. I don't care about street use!! I felt the 185's would be major overkill on a 306. And a 1 5/8 inch header won't even cover the exhaust port on these heads!! THe 165's are producing as much a 500 hp with a naturally aspirated combo. The motor will be shifted at approximately 6500 RPM.
Click to expand...
Well, considering the engine is to be run to 6500rpm, and low end, off-idle torque isn't a concern, the RPM II should be the intake of choice, but the 185's would still have been a better head choice to accompany it, IMO. The 165's are an excellent street head and designed to breathe well from the idle-6000rpm, but will rapidly take a downward spiral soon after that. The 185's are designed to run from the 1500-6500rpm margin where you seem to be planning on spending most of your time and would still be a better choice, regardless of the engines 306 displacement. If high RPM's are what you're looking for, I'd consider have the 165's ported. If not, then stick with the Regular RPM intake and concentrate on a cam selection that's going to give you a better bang within the idle-6000rpm parameters and stick with a set of 1 5/8 headers. You could run the big intake with the 165’s, and 1 3/4, but you’ll definitely be leaving some power on the table at both ends and might find yourself with less than dramatic low end and a not quite capable top end.
 

88GTStreetRod

Member
Jan 5, 2004
376
1
18
USA
Feb 18, 2004
#7
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #7
I just installed the RPMII intake with the Performer RPM heads. Man.... What a difference. The car as a lot more punch above 4,000. I think I lost a little on the bottom end, but I ended up putting 4.10 gears in and that solved my concerns. I would go with the RPMII with your set up and set the fuel at 38lbs. I gained 96 HP by adding the heads and intake. I had to also clock my mass air metter 90 degress so that the sensor would pick up the much larger amount of air being pulled in throuh the cold air intake.


Bad Animal said:
My combo is a 306 with afr 165 with a custom cam (550/560), 70mm tb, 75maf, 30# injectors, 3.73's, TKO tranny, 1 3/4 longtubes. What intake do you guys recommend?? The RPM or the RPMII?? Also what kind of fuel pressure do you recommend I start with??? It was running rich at 35#'s!!!! Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Feb 18, 2004
#8
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #8
i dont ssee the big fuss here its a 306....the 185 would be kinda overkill with that setup. its just a basic bolt on setup. gonn ahve to know what range the cam is good in. But im still gonna say just go with teh RPM.
 
8

87gtconv

ragtopman
Founding Member
Feb 11, 1999
2,595
0
0
Southern Calif
Feb 18, 2004
#9
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #9
To me your mods seem a little uneven for a street/strip some mods more for street some more for strip but I would get the RPM 2 which is good for up to about 350 hp!
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
Feb 18, 2004
#10
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #10
Truthfully I would get the regular Performer. But hell where I live I have to have my low end. I dont drive on the highway.

Dave
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 18, 2004
#11
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #11
I think the RPM II is designed to compete with the Holley Systemax II intake and the TFS Track heat R sereis intakes. AFR recomends the RPM for thier heads.
 

Black331Stang

Active Member
Apr 29, 2003
1,485
0
36
Long Island, NY
Feb 18, 2004
#12
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #12
yeah the RPM matches well.....and i think the RPM can handle up to alot more than that. Even ford says the Cobra was rated to 400 HP lol pffftt right. (NA) ive seen dynos of RPM IIs make 17-20 more HP in the 400+ range.
 
8

8urlt1

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
24
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#13
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #13
double post.....
 
8

8urlt1

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
24
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#14
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #14
Bad Animal said:
My combo is a 306 with afr 165 with a custom cam (550/560), 70mm tb, 75maf, 30# injectors, 3.73's, TKO tranny, 1 3/4 longtubes. What intake do you guys recommend?? The RPM or the RPMII?? Also what kind of fuel pressure do you recommend I start with??? It was running rich at 35#'s!!!! Thanks in advance
Click to expand...

i dont think thats a custom grind. its favoring the exhaust any custom cam designer would not favor the exhaust on a set of afrs they need no help on the exhaust side. You better start by sending that back and getting your money back. i honestly dont think anyone can give you an accurate intake selection without the duration of the cam rather the lift. Whats this car going to see more, Track or Street?
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#15
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #15
185's are not overkill unless you can't match components correctly.

1 5/8's headers do fit the 185's, someone told you wrong.
 
8

8urlt1

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
24
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#16
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #16
Ouch
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
Feb 23, 2004
#17
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #17
8urlt1 said:
i dont think thats a custom grind. its favoring the exhaust any custom cam designer would not favor the exhaust on a set of afrs they need no help on the exhaust side. You better start by sending that back and getting your money back. i honestly dont think anyone can give you an accurate intake selection without the duration of the cam rather the lift. Whats this car going to see more, Track or Street?
Click to expand...

My cam favors exhaust. Custom from Ed Curtis, and I'm using AFR 185s....

What intake did you have listed when the cam was specced out? You should use that. If not, I think you'll do plenty fine w/ the RPM (old style)
 
8

8urlt1

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
24
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#18
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #18
thats odd i have many friends with eds cams with afrs and they all favor the intake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
81
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fuel 19lbs EV6 fuel injectors, what fuel pressure???
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 6 7 8
Replies
144
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 25, 2024
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?