RWHP of a stock 95 GT??????????????????

Afastgts95

New Member

Mar 11, 2004

50

0

0

May 13, 2004

#1

• May 13, 2004

• #1

What is the true rwhp of a 95 GT stock does it make 215 at the crank or wheels? What about torque?

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

May 13, 2004

#2

• May 13, 2004

• #2

low 190s

if you have a ragged out block with lots of miles maybe high mid 180s

high 270s-280 torque.

 

GTPhreak

Founding Member

Mar 16, 2000

5,505

0

77

Rowlett, TEXAS

May 13, 2004

#3

• May 13, 2004

• #3

my stock numbers are in my sig

 

mto502

Founding Member

Sep 18, 2002

357

0

0

Ancaster, Ontario

May 13, 2004

#4

• May 13, 2004

• #4

Mine made 160 rwhp and about 250 torque. We figure the stock cats were clogged from all the sitting the car did since it only had about 29,000 miles on it.
The average 94/95 I've seen on the dyno made about 180 rwhp and 250-270 torque.

 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my

15 Year Member

May 7, 2002

11,178

13

89

Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"

May 13, 2004

#5

• May 13, 2004

• #5

There is NO WAY our car in STOCK form has 270-280 TQ!
RC

 

GTPhreak

Founding Member

Mar 16, 2000

5,505

0

77

Rowlett, TEXAS

May 13, 2004

#6

• May 13, 2004

• #6

94GTLaserRC said:

There is NO WAY our car in STOCK form has 270-280 TQ!
RC

Click to expand...

273.3 ft/lbs in stock form on my car looks like between 270 and 280. dyno'd shortly after purchased with no mods at all

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

May 13, 2004

#7

• May 13, 2004

• #7

94GTLaserRC said:

There is NO WAY our car in STOCK form has 270-280 TQ!
RC

Click to expand...

oooook

i have seen one do 279 100k on the clock

he may have had 12 degrees of timing.

 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my

15 Year Member

May 7, 2002

11,178

13

89

Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"

May 14, 2004

#8

• May 14, 2004

• #8

That $hit is hard to believe...With all my mods before the blower AND a PI Stallion I only dynoed 278 (249 with mods and no converter)

RC

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

May 14, 2004

#9

• May 14, 2004

• #9

94GTLaserRC said:

That $hit is hard to believe...With all my mods before the blower AND a PI Stallion I only dynoed 278 (249 with mods and no converter)

RC

Click to expand...

On my last dyno run before my mods I just did I dynoed at 231 RWHP and 285 FT LBS TQ, that was on full exhuast, bigger mass air, Cobra intake, UD Pullies and 14* of timming.

 

GTPhreak

Founding Member

Mar 16, 2000

5,505

0

77

Rowlett, TEXAS

May 14, 2004

#10

• May 14, 2004

• #10

whats hard to believe? its no secret that auto's suck up more power than manual trannys

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

May 14, 2004

#11

• May 14, 2004

• #11

GTPhreak said:

whats hard to believe? its no secret that auto's suck up more power than manual trannys

Click to expand...

Takes a lot of tq to power a slush box. Unless you've got a decent tc in there, even at high rpm's you're going to give up a lot of tq to a manual.

FWIW, mine turned in 172.6 hp @ 4500 and 232.5 tq @ 3500 2 years ago (Bassani catback and ASP pullies). It's important to realize though that this was on a Mustang dyno, not a Dynojet.

 

9

95red

New Member

Apr 13, 2004

127

0

0

May 14, 2004

#12

• May 14, 2004

• #12

hey this ones for baglock1 is that you in pic or your gf or what??? but w/e its SMOKIN HOTT!!!!

 

B

baglock1

The Bartender

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

6,612

1

78

Space Coast, FL

May 14, 2004

#13

• May 14, 2004

• #13

95red said:

hey this ones for baglock1 is that you in pic or your gf or what??? but w/e its SMOKIN HOTT!!!!

Click to expand...

Looks a bit like my wife but my wife is better looking.