• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

safe to go lower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19mustang65
  • Start date Start date Apr 8, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 8, 2005
#1
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #1
i started a thread like this before the crash and lost everything that was in it so im starting it again....

i have a shelby drop and 1 " drop 620 coils on the front of my 65 coupe. i have quite a bit of wheel well space that i dont like seeing. would it be ok to cut half a coil off and not loose to much handeling or any at all? or would that be to low for the suspension to work properly?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Apr 9, 2005
#2
  • Apr 9, 2005
  • #2
19mustang65 said:
i started a thread like this before the crash and lost everything that was in it so im starting it again....

i have a shelby drop and 1 " drop 620 coils on the front of my 65 coupe. i have quite a bit of wheel well space that i dont like seeing. would it be ok to cut half a coil off and not loose to much handeling or any at all? or would that be to low for the suspension to work properly?
Click to expand...


i would start with a 1/4 coil and see if that gets it where you want it. get under the front of the car and see how close the lower control arms are to being parallel with the ground, you want them pretty much parallel to the ground for best handling or slightly higher at the inner mount, if the are lower at the inner mount you went too far and it will effect the handling and braking of the car adversely.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Apr 9, 2005
#3
  • Apr 9, 2005
  • #3
I cut one full coil off of mine. I didnt do the shelby drop though.
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 9, 2005
#4
  • Apr 9, 2005
  • #4
bnickel said:
i would start with a 1/4 coil and see if that gets it where you want it. get under the front of the car and see how close the lower control arms are to being parallel with the ground, you want them pretty much parallel to the ground for best handling or slightly higher at the inner mount, if the are lower at the inner mount you went too far and it will effect the handling and braking of the car adversely.
Click to expand...


ill have the check out what the angle is right now and go from there i guess. 1/4 coil would lower about 1/2-3/4 i take it?
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Apr 9, 2005
#5
  • Apr 9, 2005
  • #5
The shelby drop of 1" does NOT drop the car one inch. So at this point you are only 1" down with the coils. Go 1/4" cut at a time
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 10, 2005
#6
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #6
does anybody have any pics of their stangs or any stangs that have the shelby relocation, 1" drop springs AND coils cut?
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Apr 10, 2005
#7
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #7
Couple questions:
1. What size tires are you running on the car.
2. What kind off exhaust do you have on the car.
3. What kind of oil pan?


I have 620 drops with the shelby mod front and 5 leaf mid eyes rear and it is pretty low to the tires in the front and I managed to get a little slight rake to it in the rear (I do have a little more weight on mine in the front than you). I have long tube headers and they have touch ground on a few occasions. I also have a 9 quart oil pan and if I went any lower I would be really worried about it.

 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 10, 2005
#8
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #8
geostang351 said:
The shelby drop of 1" does NOT drop the car one inch. So at this point you are only 1" down with the coils. Go 1/4" cut at a time
Click to expand...

people always say that, but ive got a shelby drop and 1" drop coils, and the frame drags on small speed bumps, so i would think my car is dropped more than 2" from this combination
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 10, 2005
#9
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #9
dodgestang said:
Couple questions:
1. What size tires are you running on the car.
2. What kind off exhaust do you have on the car.
3. What kind of oil pan?
Click to expand...

my tires and wheels are smaller than yours..front is 185/70 14 and rear 205/70 14
i have lock tube headers which do scrape on speed bumps when there are more than 2 peps in car.
the oil pan is stock size, whatever size that is.
i have the same setup as you on front and rear suspension. i know its alot in the tires but chances are im gonna have these tires and wheels for a while cuz of the cost of new ones.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 10, 2005
#10
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #10
19mustang65 said:
my tires and wheels are smaller than yours..front is 185/70 14 and rear 205/70 14
i have lock tube headers which do scrape on speed bumps when there are more than 2 peps in car.
the oil pan is stock size, whatever size that is.
i have the same setup as you on front and rear suspension. i know its alot in the tires but chances are im gonna have these tires and wheels for a while cuz of the cost of new ones.
Click to expand...

i wouldnt go lower then, you will hate it scraping on everthing
 

Pbum5

Member
Oct 27, 2004
515
0
17
Minneapolis, MN
Apr 10, 2005
#11
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #11
dodgestang said:
Couple questions:
1. What size tires are you running on the car.
2. What kind off exhaust do you have on the car.
3. What kind of oil pan?


I have 620 drops with the shelby mod front and 5 leaf mid eyes rear and it is pretty low to the tires in the front and I managed to get a little slight rake to it in the rear (I do have a little more weight on mine in the front than you). I have long tube headers and they have touch ground on a few occasions. I also have a 9 quart oil pan and if I went any lower I would be really worried about it.

Click to expand...


Looks Good!
Where are the Eyes on your 5 leafs? Mid or Reverse? Where did you buy your 5leafs?
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Apr 10, 2005
#12
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #12
65fast: think about it. When you did the shelby drop, how far did the spindle drop? None. It remains. It just changes the geometry
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Apr 10, 2005
#13
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #13
It still lowers the car a little bit. The spindal is a hinge point, and the shock tower is another hindge point. In the middle of the A arm the spring has its own hinge point. If you lower the shock tower hinge point, it will lower the spring hinge piont, but not as much. I would guess you get about 1/2 drop from the shelby location.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 10, 2005
#14
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #14
geostang351 said:
65fast: think about it. When you did the shelby drop, how far did the spindle drop? None. It remains. It just changes the geometry
Click to expand...

it changed......stock has the stock coil pushing on the coil spring saddle which is connected to the upper control arm. you have a long spring and the upper control arm is close to the top of the car, this gives the upper control arm alot less room to move up before it puts normal pressure on the coil and shock. when the upper control arm goes up, the spindle moves up and the car sits lower. if you move the upper control arm down 1" and put a shorter 620 pound coil on it, the upper control arm has ALOT of room to move before putting normal pressure on the coil and shock. Infact, most people with the 620 pound coils and shelby drop can just jack their car all the way up and remove/install the springs without using a spring compressor. It changes it ALOT in effect when you have the two combined.

as i said, the front sway bar almost ALWAYS drags on any bump or slight pot hole, and the frame dargs on even small speed bumps......Picture of lowered
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 10, 2005
#15
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #15
i was looking at my lower control arm to see how level it was to the ground. i also looked at a gt350 last night to see how the arm sat..it was flat. here is a pic of mine
 

Attachments

  • Mag00177.webp
    19 KB · Views: 147

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Apr 10, 2005
#16
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #16
Pbum5 said:
Looks Good!
Where are the Eyes on your 5 leafs? Mid or Reverse? Where did you buy your 5leafs?
Click to expand...

Mids & Mustang Plus.




I would not recomend going any lower if you drag on occasion already, if you are concerned about tire/fender gap, put the right outer diameter set on the car first, then you think about lowering it a little more get the gaps just where you want them.




Shelby drop while lowering the upper control arm 1 inch for geometry reasons nets as a side effect about 1/2 inch drop because the physical distance between the spring seats has increased also.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Apr 11, 2005
#17
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #17
65fastback2+2 said:
people always say that, but ive got a shelby drop and 1" drop coils, and the frame drags on small speed bumps, so i would think my car is dropped more than 2" from this combination
Click to expand...

From looking at the pictures.. I'd say that your car is dropped at least 2", if not slightly more.

However, the shelby drop does indeed only drop the car about 1/2". I don't know why your car is so low, but I would guess your springs are the culprit... Could they have given you springs for a 6cyln or something?
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Apr 11, 2005
#18
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #18
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
From looking at the pictures.. I'd say that your car is dropped at least 2", if not slightly more.

However, the shelby drop does indeed only drop the car about 1/2". I don't know why your car is so low, but I would guess your springs are the culprit... Could they have given you springs for a 6cyln or something?
Click to expand...

i dunno, but i love how it sits so im not complaining....all the guys love how it sits, one buddy rode with me last night, he has 12" of overall lift on his FX4 and he goes "wow, im not used to riding on the ground"
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 11, 2005
#19
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #19
i measured my height today...the front(subframe under front of door) and it was 6 1/2 inches. the back(subframe in front of leaf eye) and it was 8" or so.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Apr 12, 2005
#20
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #20
19mustang65 said:
i was looking at my lower control arm to see how level it was to the ground. i also looked at a gt350 last night to see how the arm sat..it was flat. here is a pic of mine
Click to expand...

Cripes man, with headers hanging that low I wouldn't lower it that much more. When I had full length headers and stock height it dragged on just about everything. Now I have shorties and nothing drags unless I enter a steep driveway at an angle.

Plus you were asking, so here it is. 620lb spings + shelby drop + 1 full coil cut, although it obviously isn't a 65. You also have to account how your tires may or may not clear when lowered that much.
 

Attachments

  • P8280017-vi.webp
    34.2 KB · Views: 111
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Paint and Body Frame rail dimensions
  • keel
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2026
keel
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
157
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
D
1999 G/T 4.6 A/C clutch not engaging.
  • David B.
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
295
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 8, 2025
David B.
D
Fuse link bad?
  • Creomod
  • Sep 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?