• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Saggy sportlines...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2006

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 24, 2006
#1
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #1
As they settle on my car the rear looks a little saggy ill take some new pics soon... but anyone else with sn95's seeing this problem i know it happens often with the 99 up guys
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 24, 2006
#2
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #2
no wait i might just be a dumb ass i have a trunk full of **** clutch kit ect.... have to have like 100lbs back there lol
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Oct 24, 2006
#3
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #3
I sympathize. I just did used Mach 1's on the fox vert and the rear looks like crap. It needs more height back there (the rear is almost lower than the front. ).
 

LGSCHMIDTJR

New Member
May 10, 2005
10
0
1
Austin Texas
Oct 24, 2006
#4
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #4
adam and hissing

could this have anything to do with the verts being heavier, and the spring being coupe specific??


laurence
 

mustang6tee8

Member
Jul 19, 2005
375
0
17
College Station, TX
Oct 24, 2006
#5
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #5
HISSIN50 said:
I sympathize. I just did used Mach 1's on the fox vert and the rear looks like crap. It needs more height back there (the rear is almost lower than the front. ).
Click to expand...

aww that's not good to hear.. what happened to them?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Oct 24, 2006
#6
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #6
mustang6tee8 said:
aww that's not good to hear.. what happened to them?
Click to expand...
I dont know. Everything was great from you - the springs cleaned up real nice and looked good-to-go.
The OEM vert springs were night and day contrast however. A solid 2"+ taller (just like the fronts, in terms of height difference) but the stock rears are much thicker (I should mic the coils and take pics just for future reference for people). I've not come across many folks who have put Mach 1's in a fox vert; I thought a Mach 1 would probably weigh as much as a fox vert so it would work. I guess I was wrong.

I also noticed that the top OEM rear spring isolator was much thicker than the ES poly that I replaced it with. Seems like it's a totality of little things that make things look less good than I hoped. I like a little bit of rake (my rear sits 1/4" lower than the front - that's the wrong kind of rake. ).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
101
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
239
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
442
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
673
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
333
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?