• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

SBF crank snout diameter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoCalCruising
  • Start date Start date Sep 20, 2005

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 20, 2005
#1
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #1
I'm away from my garage, tools, crank, etc. Does anyone know the diameter of a 302 crank snout? Thanks!
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 20, 2005
#2
  • Sep 20, 2005
  • #2
I don't know it should be, idealy. But most off by a few thousands anyways. And when you get a new dampner, they are small enough to take some meat out, so it fits the crank correctly.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 21, 2005
#3
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #3
Answer: 1.375" on mine. I already (previously) had my damper honed to fit. This question had to do with how my crank gear was fitting and how I was planning to make a fixture to hone its ID, slightly. I was at work, was making the fixture and didn't have the dimension handy.

In your experience, how tight should the crank gear be? Or, how much force should be used to mount it? Thanks.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 21, 2005
#4
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #4
Answer: very tight with 9-keyway sprocket like I'm using. I have learned that it should be heated and then pushed on with a proper sized tube of aluminum. Anyway, ya'll can ignore this thread now.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 22, 2005
#5
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #5
Install with heat? Thats ounds too tight to me. The handful of smallblock Fords I've dealt with never needed heat to install or remove the crank timing gear. It should be a slip fit.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 22, 2005
#6
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #6
Evidently, the 9-keyway model requires a tighter fit, according to Kato Engineering at the Corral. His advice is generally spot on.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 22, 2005
#7
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #7
Yeah, Kato usually is; I've just never heard of having to do that before.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fuel Damper, 2003 Mustang GT
  • bmmckl
  • Dec 19, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
167
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 19, 2025
bmmckl
S
Help needed - Cranks, no Start
  • sleeping93coupe
  • Nov 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
283
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2025
AeroCoupe
8
Did I fry something messing with my ignition?
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
981
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
A
Check Engine codes jumping around
  • azactor
  • Jan 9, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
164
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
gkomo
D
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?