• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

school me on wheels and wheel spacers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fox_84
  • Start date Start date Jul 21, 2006

Fox_84

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
143
0
0
Jul 21, 2006
#1
  • Jul 21, 2006
  • #1
About to order wheels and just not sure which ones to go with. Going with 17x9 Just confused on the offset and backspacing. See if I have this correct. Wheel #1 has 6.11 backspacing and +26mm offset
Wheel #2 has 5.95 backspacing and +24mm offset.
Is wheel #1 going to set deeper in the fenders than wheel one?
So wheel #2 is going to stick out further toward outside of fender lip?
Does this depend upon the backspacing or offset. I have read one way of explaining this and just didn't quite get it.

Also, how thick of a wheel spacer can I run on stock lug length and still be safe? Are wheel spacers a bad idea? Just tryin to get the wheels to stick out a little further for a wider stance. Thoughts on this???
 
B

Bladez5_0

Founding Member
Apr 14, 2001
460
0
17
Goose Creek, SC
Jul 21, 2006
#2
  • Jul 21, 2006
  • #2
Wheel spacers are bad. Period. I've seen one fail on a Ranger on the interstate. Trashed the right front corner of the truck. As for the backspacing I'm not going to make a wrong input for you.
 

4G-KDMP

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2005
935
19
39
CA
Jul 21, 2006
#3
  • Jul 21, 2006
  • #3
i have read that MM is a good and reputable company to deal with, so if wheel spacers were that bad why would MM sell them?

is it really wheel spacers or lug bolts that’s the problem.
most ppl who say the lugs broke not the spacer.

if you want look here
http://www.maximummotorsports.com/

http://www.wheeladapter.com/home.asp
 

Fox_84

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
143
0
0
Jul 21, 2006
#4
  • Jul 21, 2006
  • #4
can anyone help me further understand the wheels?
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jul 22, 2006
#5
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #5
you can search google for info on backspacing and offset.

I know backspacing is the distance from where the wheel mounts in the rear straight up to where the edge of the wheel is. If you stuck a ruler end on the back side of the wheel that mounts to the hub and held it straight, you'd look down the back side of the wheel and see 6.11" on wheel #1 and 5.95" on wheel #2.

What this means is that wheel #1 would have more wheel toward the inner fender/quad shock and less space toward the outside/fender.

Wheel #2 would have less wheel behind and more in front.

I will say that with both, unless you remove your quad shocks, you may have issues there. Some people are able to flip them and that works for some.

I've never read enough or had to deal with offset enough to understand it.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Jul 22, 2006
#6
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #6
4G-KDMP said:
iis it really wheel spacers or lug bolts that’s the problem.
most ppl who say the lugs broke not the spacer.
Click to expand...


But it's the spacer that puts the extra forces on the lugs causing them to break.


MM does make quality spacers. They are hubcentric so all the load is placed on the hubs and not the lugs. Downside is this style is expensive.

The really bad spacers are the cheap ones you see at pep boys or autozone. It's scary that people put these things on their car.

I don't like spacers at all, but if you are going to run them, get the MM spacers AND upgrade to hardened lugs
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jul 22, 2006
#7
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #7
I decided to remove my quad shocks, rather than use spacers.

As the other guy said, spacers put extra strain on the lugs.

I don't know if hub-centric spacers really help, either. Even with hub-centric spacers, I believe that most of the car's weight still rests on the lugs. It's an ongoing debate, but most authoritative sources I've read, say that most of a car's weight rests on the lugs, not on the hubs. One way think about it: How tight are the hubs, and how tight are the lugs nuts when fully tightened? The lug nuts are much tighter than the hubs, therefore I think that most of the car's weight rests on the lug nuts, and therefore on the lugs.

I'm running 15x8 rims, with 275/50/15 Nitto drag radials. The big tires wouldn't fit with the quad shocks, so I removed the quad shocks. I also used a hammer to pound in the lower lip of my inner fender wells, just for a little extra room.

Just driving around town, I don't notice any major problems, with the missing quad shocks. I'm going to get aftermarket control arms and bushings, to minimize the possibility of wheel hop, and to tighten up the suspension.

Anyway, my 15x8 rims have 5.5 inch backspacing. Backspacing is the distance between the axle-wheel interface and the back of the wheel (the part of the wheel closest to the car). The larger the backspacing, the further inward the wheel will be.

However, there's a big difference between 15 inch rims with big fat tires, and 17 inch rims. The 17 inch rims have more clearance toward the center, because of the larger radius.

And, of course, it depends on how wide the tires are. And the brand of tires. Nittos run narrow, and BFG run wide, or so I've heard. It also may even depend on the rim brand, or maybe not. I'm not sure about that.

If you have too much backspacing, the wheels will hit your inner fender wells, and of course the quad shocks, if you keep your quad shocks. If you have too little backspacing, the wheels may rub on the upper outer lip of the fenders, when your wheels hit a bump, or when you turn onto a steep driveway (in other words, whenever the wheel is deflected upward for any reason).

Spacers are a "crutch" for improper backspacing, in my opinion.

You should do lots of searches.

I'm not really sure what the best backspacing is, for 17x9 rims, but I'm sure there are lots of posts on that subject.

My guesstimate would be the 5.95 inch backspacing, so that maybe you won't have to remove your quad shocks, but that's only a wild guess.

Again, I would avoid spacers at all costs.
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jul 22, 2006
#8
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #8
More info: Do a keyword search on these 2 words: 17x9 backspacing

Be sure to only search the "5.0 Mustang" forum.

Here's one thread I found:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=493567&highlight=17x9+backspacing

They recommended the 5.95 inch backspacing.
 

4G-KDMP

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2005
935
19
39
CA
Jul 22, 2006
#9
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #9
Mustang5L5 said:
But it's the spacer that puts the extra forces on the lugs causing them to break.


MM does make quality spacers. They are hubcentric so all the load is placed on the hubs and not the lugs. Downside is this style is expensive.

The really bad spacers are the cheap ones you see at pep boys or autozone. It's scary that people put these things on their car.

I don't like spacers at all, but if you are going to run them, get the MM spacers AND upgrade to hardened lugs
Click to expand...

so what you are saying is you get what you pay for.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Jul 22, 2006
#10
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #10
Look up underpressuregt and wheelspacers and youll get your answer on spacers..
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Jul 22, 2006
#11
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #11
The difference between a 5.95 and 6.11 is about 1/8" not enough to make any difference either way. Wheel spacers are a band aid fix, period. And since no ine as explaind offset vs. backspacing, I will. As mentioned earlier, backspacing is the distance from the mounting pad to the back of the wheel. Offset is the distance from the center of the wheel to the mounting surface. So wheel #1 is 26mm from the center of the wheel to the mounting surface. Since it is a positive offset, the mounting surface is in front of the center. A negative offset wheel the mounting surface is behind the center, these are usually found on trucks, and older rear drive cars. So my advice is this, forget the spacers and the skateboard wheel sticking out look, and buy whichever wheel you like better.
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jul 22, 2006
#12
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #12
RsStanG1987 said:
Look up underpressuregt and wheelspacers and youll get your answer on spacers..
Click to expand...

Here's that thread:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=585637

By the way, if I remember correctly, wheel spacers are usually not allowed at drag strips.
 

89Notch

Founding Member
Oct 21, 1999
1,669
0
0
MSU
Jul 22, 2006
#13
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #13
the wheels on the bus go round and round
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
Jul 22, 2006
#14
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #14
Wheel spacers are bad. A 4 lug fox came into my dads old shop one time with a horrendous vibration and it turned out 3 lugs had fallen off the wheel, and the last one was loose. That was about to be ugly. Wheel spacers on a race car are different, they probably have their wheels taken off all the time so their constantly retightened. Spacers will make lugs come loose, period.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jul 22, 2006
#15
  • Jul 22, 2006
  • #15
Wheel spacers are the devil!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
R
Is rear axle offset common with these cars?
  • Rembrant
  • Feb 17, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2024
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
M
9" wheel front strut
  • mcowing
  • May 16, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
666
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 16, 2021
mcowing
M
Fox Need advise on front suspension setup
  • mob
  • Feb 5, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 12, 2022
HotFox
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?