• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Shelby Drop Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter downpiped
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2007

downpiped

New Member
Dec 4, 2006
36
0
0
Albany, Ga
Jan 15, 2007
#1
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #1
Currently Im still working on my Granada disc swap and all new front suspension swap on my 67 fastback...Ive researched a lot and most of the shelby drops that Ive read about are on 65-66's, even Bav's website said shelby stopped the practice in 66
There are suspension differences between 65-66's and 67-68's, so would it still be worth is to drill two more holes in my shock towers on my 67 or is it mainly practiced for 65-66's?

Thanks,
Jamie
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 15, 2007
#2
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #2
there is actually quite a bit of debate on whether or not it actually helps but pretty much everyone i've ever talked to that has done it said it was worth it.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 15, 2007
#3
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #3
shelby stopped doing the mod in 66 as a cost saving measure. the mod is still effective on the later cars, even though ford revised the suspension geometry on the 67 and later cars.
 

red302

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1998
881
0
17
Peru, IL
Jan 15, 2007
#4
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #4
Just finished the complete suspension, Granada disc brake swap, and shelby drop on my '68 fastback yesterday. The car is back on its wheels, but I still have to plumb in the master cylinder and prop. valve. I asked the same question on here when I started the project, and after listening to the replies, decided to do the shelby drop also. The car sits exactly as I wanted it to after all the work, and I figured doing the shelby drop can only help the handling. Also, since it adds negative camber when the suspension compresses, it gives me more tire clearance when turning too.
 

Attachments

  • Front susp done side.webp
    43.5 KB · Views: 161

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Jan 15, 2007
#5
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #5
Sorry to go off-topic. But, red302, what size and brand of wheels and tires are those? They look good.
 

1965stangcoupe

New Member
Sep 7, 2006
82
0
0
Mount Vernon Washington
Jan 16, 2007
#6
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #6
I am sorry too but do you have more pictures of your car!!? I like it!
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 16, 2007
#7
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #7
There were improvements made for '67, but still leaves room for more. The suspension did not change much through 1970. The Boss 302 chassis handbook recomends lowering the UCA 1" in stage 2 and 1.25" in stage 3. I don't know , but I think that rules then required use of stock control arms which limited how much the UCA could be moved. I re-angled the upper ball joint on my UCAs to allow a lower drop, but I have not decided how much. Most people throw around generic numbers about what is best, but I find it hard to believe that 66 back and 67 up need the same change to the UCA position. I also find it hard to believe that cars with different ride heights need the UCA in the same place. Short of running the numbers through an analyzer, I don't think anyone will know the answer to where the UCA mount needs to be.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Jan 16, 2007
#8
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #8
There are templates that have been posted here before just remember to use the right one. The 65 66 template is patterned with holes 1" down (maybe 1" 1/2 down) and 1/8 rearward. This doesnt actually shift the new holes rearward but allows them to be drilled stait down because the holes are on a slant. But I think the 67 68 template does not shift rearward because of the suspension differences.
 

red302

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1998
881
0
17
Peru, IL
Jan 16, 2007
#9
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #9
CarFreakGT said:
Sorry to go off-topic. But, red302, what size and brand of wheels and tires are those? They look good.
Click to expand...

Thanks guys!
They're Billet Specialties Fastlane wheels. Fronts are 17" x 7" whith 225-45-17 tires, and the rears are 17" x 8" with 255-45-17's.
1965stangcoupe.....I'll post a couple more pics when I get home later this evening.
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Jan 16, 2007
#10
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #10
tos said:
There are templates that have been posted here before just remember to use the right one. The 65 66 template is patterned with holes 1" down (maybe 1" 1/2 down) and 1/8 rearward. This doesnt actually shift the new holes rearward but allows them to be drilled stait down because the holes are on a slant. But I think the 67 68 template does not shift rearward because of the suspension differences.
Click to expand...


Here's a link to said template--it's on 2bav8's homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/2bav8/granada.html#shelby

EDIT: Scroll ~1/2 way down the page to the hyperlink to the template. There is a separate template for 65-66 and 67-70, but they are on the same page.

EDIT AGAIN: Thanks for the wheel/tire info, red302!
 

red302

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1998
881
0
17
Peru, IL
Jan 16, 2007
#11
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #11
1965stangcoupe said:
I am sorry too but do you have more pictures of your car!!? I like it!
Click to expand...

Thanks man, here's a couple.
 

Attachments

  • '68 new wheels.webp
    64.7 KB · Views: 160
  • '68 new wheels2.webp
    62.2 KB · Views: 150
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Looking for others who swapped in a 4.6L engine
  • PeteFL
  • Jan 15, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
531
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2025
LILCBRA
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
615
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
J
The Money Pit
  • jessie Clark
  • Sep 14, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
251
The Welcome Wagon Sep 14, 2024
89ripper
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Moving toward paint
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2026
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?