• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Shopping for cylinder heads... questions...

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 10, 2008
#21
  • Feb 10, 2008
  • #21
Milling the heads brings the valves even closer to the pistons. As to how much it changes the ratio, that depends on how much is removed and how large the chambers are to start with. On a 351W, I'd think .040 off would be short of a half point in the ratio, just off the top of my head.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Feb 10, 2008
#22
  • Feb 10, 2008
  • #22
D.Hearne said:
Milling the heads brings the valves even closer to the pistons. As to how much it changes the ratio, that depends on how much is removed and how large the chambers are to start with. On a 351W, I'd think .040 off would be short of a half point in the ratio, just off the top of my head.
Click to expand...

Hmm. Just doing the angles in my head I highly doubt I'd be able to run the cam I want with stock pistons with the TW heads milled down. I'll look into it more I guess while I get this suspension done.

In the meantime... can anyone recommend a set of 9.5-10:1 compression, notched (for the AFRs... if I get new pistons, i'm going all out with the heads) for a 351w? Something fairly durable but not ridiculously expensive woudl be nice.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Feb 10, 2008
#23
  • Feb 10, 2008
  • #23
Check these out: http://dssracing.com/propistons.htm
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Feb 11, 2008
#24
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #24
SadbutTrue said:
HOw much does that usually run? Whats a 'cometic'? Does shaving the heads down still allow you to run 2.02s? How much does that bump up the compression? I like the idea in concept...
Click to expand...

Cometics are in the $60-80 a piece range depending on the thickness.

The only issues are the cost and you have to make sure the block face is completely clean.

Other than that . . . they will never blow out and you can re-use them.

The "How-to rebuild SBFs" book states the 69-72s are 9.5:1 while the 73-76s are 8.7:1

On a 69-72, you probably could get away with just taking .030" off which would drop the chamber down to ~56cc and roughly make 10:1 from the previous 9.5:1

Over the giant dish piston, a 56cc chamber and the .029" thick cometics would come out to 9.45:1 from the anemic 8.7:1.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 11, 2008
#25
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #25
57fairlane said:
Cometics are in the $60-80 a piece range depending on the thickness.

The only issues are the cost and you have to make sure the block face is completely clean.

Other than that . . . they will never blow out and you can re-use them.

The "How-to rebuild SBFs" book states the 69-72s are 9.5:1 while the 73-76s are 8.7:1

On a 69-72, you probably could get away with just taking .030" off which would drop the chamber down to ~56cc and roughly make 10:1 from the previous 9.5:1

Over the giant dish piston, a 56cc chamber and the .029" thick cometics would come out to 9.45:1 from the anemic 8.7:1.
Click to expand...


it really depends on the block casting. a C9 or D0 block will have the 9.5:1 if it's a D1 block it will have the lower 8.8:1 compression. my 73 windsor has the D1 block.....
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2008
#26
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #26
No matter what the books say, there was a definate piston change from 71 to 72. I have proof of this. One piston from each. Both have dished tops, but the 72 piston is deeper. Only the 69 4 bbl Windsors had the flat topped 10 to 1 pistons.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 11, 2008
#27
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #27
the D1 blocks are also taller by .020 than the early blocks but the pistons have the same deck height, lowering compression even more.

actually D the 69 flat top is a 10.75:1 compression piston (with 60cc chambers)
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2008
#28
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #28
bnickel said:
the D1 blocks are also taller by .020 than the early blocks but the pistons have the same deck height, lowering compression even more.

actually D the 69 flat top is a 10.75:1 compression piston (with 60cc chambers)
Click to expand...

Yea, I kinda figured as much on the 69's compression ratio, but wasn't sure off hand. I think the deck difference is only about .020 like the 302's were. Nothing a milling can't fix.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
816
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Heads and how to buy
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
919
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?