• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Shorty headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter divad82
  • Start date Start date Mar 15, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

divad82

New Member
Oct 25, 2006
53
0
0
Mar 15, 2011
#1
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #1
Will shorty headers give a different exhaust tone hooked up to stock mid pipe and jba axle backs. I know shorties don't give much HP or performance but was hoping it would give a more aggressive tone. Long tubes are not in the budget so scratch that. Let me know. Thanks
 

jpplaw

Member
Jan 14, 2009
185
3
18
Mar 15, 2011
#2
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #2
I had BBK ceramic shorties before. Only way I can describe the sound is it sounds like the pushrod 5.0.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 15, 2011
#3
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #3
So wait until long tubes are in the budget, spending the money on shorties and paying labor to install or busting your own knuckles to install just for sound and 3HP is not worth it IMEO.
 

Zora

Member
May 13, 2007
113
1
19
Mar 19, 2011
#4
  • Mar 19, 2011
  • #4
Shorts are a waste of $$$$$
 
L

Low86GT

Active Member
Apr 9, 1999
1,724
0
36
San Jose, CA
Mar 20, 2011
#5
  • Mar 20, 2011
  • #5
Is there any performance difference between tuned length like the BBK or JBA over the Ford Racing or Pypes? Those two don't look much better than stock manifolds. I would think that the others would help a bit more. I know that nothing is going to perform like LT's but they aren't an option for everyone. California emissions testing sucks.

Since you have to run a tune with headers it's almost impossible to get an honest dyno test out of any company that makes them. I think the closest I have seen is the JBA. They say what was on the car for the baseline. If you can believe the tests they seem to be alright.
 

Zora

Member
May 13, 2007
113
1
19
Mar 20, 2011
#6
  • Mar 20, 2011
  • #6
If LTs are not an option...I would look elsewhere for performance mod. Shorts are no better than the stock manifolds. Atleast thats what dyno runs have told me.
Peace
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 20, 2011
#7
  • Mar 20, 2011
  • #7
I agree, spend the money on different mods that can make a difference.
 
M

MyGG

New Member
May 14, 2010
60
0
0
Indiana
Mar 22, 2011
#8
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #8
Ok, I'll go out a limb and disagree here. No, the short tubes don't add peak hp. What they do, from all the articles I've read about them in S197s, is move the power curve into the lower rpm range. Basically you'll gain mid-range hp from shorties and top end hp from LTs on the S197. Which is why everyone says they're worthless, because you don't see a peak hp increase which is what everyone quotes from dyno sessions. (The cars tested already had a CAI and tune, as well as pulleys I believe, so not sure if yours is stock). I'll look at a set of these eventually because I want to increase actual performance on the street and am not worried about winning a numbers game on the dyno or getting the best peak hp for high rpm situations at the track.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 22, 2011
#9
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #9
MyGG said:
Ok, I'll go out a limb and disagree here. No, the short tubes don't add peak hp. What they do, from all the articles I've read about them in S197s, is move the power curve into the lower rpm range. Basically you'll gain mid-range hp from shorties and top end hp from LTs on the S197. Which is why everyone says they're worthless, because you don't see a peak hp increase which is what everyone quotes from dyno sessions. (The cars tested already had a CAI and tune, as well as pulleys I believe, so not sure if yours is stock). I'll look at a set of these eventually because I want to increase actual performance on the street and am not worried about winning a numbers game on the dyno or getting the best peak hp for high rpm situations at the track.
Click to expand...

I disagree because of how exhaust functions. The whole reason why you get more HP, by changing headers is scavenging. LT's scavenge FAAAAAAAARRR more then shorties. As for "articles" in magazines remember those performance parts manufacturers pay thousands of dollars a year to advertise in those rags, articles are written "creatively".
 

Zora

Member
May 13, 2007
113
1
19
Mar 23, 2011
#10
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #10
SpartaPerformance said:
I disagree because of how exhaust functions. The whole reason why you get more HP, by changing headers is scavenging. LT's scavenge FAAAAAAAARRR more then shorties. As for "articles" in magazines remember those performance parts manufacturers pay thousands of dollars a year to advertise in those rags, articles are written "creatively".
Click to expand...

Ditto

Shorties
 
S

stang06girl

Member
Nov 8, 2008
30
0
6
Southern California
Mar 24, 2011
#11
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #11
Agreed that shorties don't add much (if anything) for top end power.

How much hp / torque (HP/torque curves vs. RPM) do the long tubes typically add (NA and SC) on a 3Valve application?
Which sets have the D shaped port that match the 3V heads?
Do they require special cats?
Do they require special O2 harnesses?
Which brands are the best for long tubes?
 
M

MyGG

New Member
May 14, 2010
60
0
0
Indiana
Mar 24, 2011
#12
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #12
I didn't say they flowed better, or added more top end hp. But, since I've read in magazines as well that the LTs actually lose a little hp and torque @ low rpms due to lack of back pressure, it's probably not accurate either. I'm sure the magazines were paid to provide that info too. Hence why allowing some more flow via shorties would help midrange. LTs provide the most hp at high rpms, especially with forced induction, because that's where the additinal scavenging they provide gives the most benefit. Why does everyone throw fits if someone says something good about shorties, that doesn't mean they think they're better than LTs. I know for a DD application in the low to mid rpm range the LTs are a significantly larger waste of $ than shorties.

Sparta: Sincerely, I will thank you for not selling shorties since you so adamently disagree with them, otherwise you destroy your whole business. Only sell products you believe in!
 
S

stang06girl

Member
Nov 8, 2008
30
0
6
Southern California
Mar 26, 2011
#13
  • Mar 26, 2011
  • #13
stang06girl said:
Agreed that shorties don't add much (if anything) for top end power.

How much hp / torque (HP/torque curves vs. RPM) do the long tubes typically add (NA and SC) on a 3Valve application?
Which sets have the D shaped port that match the 3V heads?
Do they require special cats?
Do they require special O2 harnesses?
Which brands are the best for long tubes?
Click to expand...

Long Tube guys ... Where are the numbers? ... all this talk and no graphs?
I'm serously thinking about a set of long tubes, but would like to see some numbers before I go to the expense and effort of the switch.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 26, 2011
#14
  • Mar 26, 2011
  • #14
stang06girl said:
Long Tube guys ... Where are the numbers? ... all this talk and no graphs?
I'm serously thinking about a set of long tubes, but would like to see some numbers before I go to the expense and effort of the switch.
Click to expand...

The only graph I have is my smile the 1st time I floored the gas and the car pulled hard like a whipped mule from 3k to 6.5K RPM <-- Kinda like that one.
 
L

Low86GT

Active Member
Apr 9, 1999
1,724
0
36
San Jose, CA
Mar 26, 2011
#15
  • Mar 26, 2011
  • #15
SpartaPerformance said:
The only graph I have is my smile the 1st time I floored the gas and the car pulled hard like a whipped mule from 3k to 6.5K RPM <-- Kinda like that one.
Click to expand...

I will agree that long tubes are great in the correct application. For DD NA street car that isn't going to be run up to 6k plus for every shift they would be a waste of time and money.

Adding a little more in the low to mid rpm's is what I would prefer for a DD. If tuned shorties will do that then I am good with it.
Due to difficulty of install or paying someone to install them they would be low on the list but they would be on the list.
 
S

stang06girl

Member
Nov 8, 2008
30
0
6
Southern California
Mar 27, 2011
#16
  • Mar 27, 2011
  • #16
SpartaPerformance said:
The only graph I have is my smile the 1st time I floored the gas and the car pulled hard like a whipped mule from 3k to 6.5K RPM <-- Kinda like that one.
Click to expand...

Long Tubes will make it pull like a whipped mule? Long tubes will add like what 20-30 hp N/A, 30-50 hp SC'd? That's a pretty lame mule. A Whipple, Kenne Bell, TVS, centri, turbo, or NOS, or 3:73 or 4:10 gears will make it pull hard like a whipped mule, not LT's.

I figured that no one would come back with dyno graphs ... just hot air.

I know JBA's have the D-shaped ports, that there are some LT's that come with high flow cats, some that don't. I know there is lot of variation in the lengths of the LT's, and that there is alot of dyno data out there on LT's.

If you really want to sell headers ... then put some real data (or links to it) in the posts instead of hot air. You also may want to consider why someone would even consider shorties over long tubes .... like smog issues? You might make a few bucks on shorties in those cases.

As a performance parts business owner you should think more about promoting your' parts instead of slamming a potential customer that doesn't share your views. If you do, then at least have the data to back it up.
 

chgovfk

15 Year Member
Apr 17, 2007
531
28
59
AZ
Apr 6, 2011
#17
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #17
I have a quickie question - I have "shorties" / pypes on my 07 Gt - I just blew the pass side exhaust gasket or it just 'let-go' - a guy I work with said to double them up - will this help? or is it useless - and should I change both sides - the pass is easier than the drivers (the drivers side sucks on my garage floor) - ......sorry to go slightly off topic.....had to use shorties ....emissions here in AZ - I'll have to put the stock H pipe back on once I get called in....
 
S

stang06girl

Member
Nov 8, 2008
30
0
6
Southern California
Apr 7, 2011
#18
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #18
If your gaskets are the asbestos fiber gaskets that might have come with the headers, get rid of them and go with the stock Ford metal gasket. I blew the fiber gasket out on my headers, stock gaskets worked fine afterwards.
 

chgovfk

15 Year Member
Apr 17, 2007
531
28
59
AZ
Apr 7, 2011
#19
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #19
Yes they were the silver (dotted) fiber ones that came with the 'shorties'....I still have the original ones ...I wonder if I can re-use them?....or I guess buy new...any idea how much they are at ford dealership?......thx for the advice ...
 
B

Bmr4life

Founding Member
Nov 18, 2000
161
0
16
ATL
Apr 14, 2011
#20
  • Apr 14, 2011
  • #20
Low86GT said:
Is there any performance difference between tuned length like the BBK or JBA over the Ford Racing or Pypes? Those two don't look much better than stock manifolds. I would think that the others would help a bit more. I know that nothing is going to perform like LT's but they aren't an option for everyone. California emissions testing sucks.

Since you have to run a tune with headers it's almost impossible to get an honest dyno test out of any company that makes them. I think the closest I have seen is the JBA. They say what was on the car for the baseline. If you can believe the tests they seem to be alright.
Click to expand...

Longtube headers do not require a tune. I trust Brenspeed and that's what they told me.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
95
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
316
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
216
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
221
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
333
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?