• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Should I be able to hit 13's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Great68
  • Start date Start date Dec 19, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 19, 2004
#1
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #1
With my current combo, well tuned, once I get the 9" in with the 3.50 gears (and trak-loc)?

All i'm shooting for this summer is to be able to walk on my buddy's 91 5.0. He talks a lot of smack, and it pisses me off. When someone is giving me compliments about my car, he'll make a comment "Too bad it's slow".

There's nothing special about his car, and he doesn't know how to drive worth a damn. He has 4.10 gears, exhaust, chip, and all he managed to get at the dragstrip was a 14.6.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Dec 19, 2004
#2
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #2
Your not stomping a mudhole in him and walking it dry now ?!?!
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Dec 19, 2004
#3
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #3
Not enough cam and too much carb.... In general, just not enough engine. I seriously doubt you'll be in the 13's, unless you're spraying... Sorry.
 

87gn2

New Member
Apr 17, 2004
101
0
0
Dec 19, 2004
#4
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #4
tires? stall convertor?

I don't think 13s are out of the question...Beating your friend is not going to be a problem, IMO.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 20, 2004
#5
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #5
10secgoal said:
Your not stomping a mudhole in him and walking it dry now ?!?!
Click to expand...

Haven't raced him since I did up my motor
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 20, 2004
#6
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #6
87gn2 said:
tires? stall convertor?

I don't think 13s are out of the question...Beating your friend is not going to be a problem, IMO.
Click to expand...

225/50R16, stock convertor (I will swap it for a 2500 stall soon enough).
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Dec 20, 2004
#7
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #7
GaPonyFarm said:
Not enough cam and too much carb.... In general, just not enough engine. I seriously doubt you'll be in the 13's, unless you're spraying... Sorry.
Click to expand...

What's up... Haven't seen you in a while ? Think the carb is too much ? Maybe.. that cam doesn't have much dur at .050 does it ? I think 13's are possible. Doesn't take a gobs of HP.

A bigger cam will benefit you and really take advantage of those heads.
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
Dec 20, 2004
#8
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #8
ditto with above, get a bigger cam to support those afrs. I dont see why you havent rocked this kid, get to the strip and show him who his daddy is.

Mike
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 20, 2004
#9
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #9
A bigger cam will come when I do up a new rollerized 331 bottom end.

For now I just want to smoke his 5.0 butt with my little 289.
 

87gn2

New Member
Apr 17, 2004
101
0
0
Dec 20, 2004
#10
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #10
Great68 said:
225/50R16, stock convertor (I will swap it for a 2500 stall soon enough).
Click to expand...

What kind of tire? As for your combo, IMO there is nothing wrong with it. Yeah, the cam is a little small. But it's a good combo and I'd bet you've got in the neighborhood of 350-360hp. Plenty of torque too.

When you pull the motor apart, have those AFRs ported on the exhaust side.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 20, 2004
#11
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #11
87gn2 said:
What kind of tire? QUOTE]

Oh sorry, they're BFGoodrich Comp T/A VR4's.
Click to expand...
 

Jonstantine

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
487
0
0
Oklahoma
Dec 20, 2004
#12
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #12
with any kind of traction you should be well into the 13's

you have a good cam for low end torque which will work fine with a high gear and low stall converter - you'll dust him no doubt
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Dec 20, 2004
#13
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #13
I like your combo, just go ahead and change convertors and you'll be set, no problems. You should be able to wax the 5.0 easily, be sure to rub it in his face.
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Dec 20, 2004
#14
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #14
I have a pretty mild and streetable combo like yours with Twisted Wedge heads, 1 size larger cam (XE268H), standard RPM intake, 2 1/2" exhaust, C4 with shift kit, and 3.55 gears and I ran a 13.91 this summer in my '66.
I think you should be close, if not in the 13's, once you get the gears.
And you should certainly beat a 14.6 if you can drive at all.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 20, 2004
#15
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #15
I like the combo too...
The carb is just right IMO.
I can't see anything to keep you from the 13s with the trac-lok and 3.50s.
A converter might help some, but you don't want to knock out some of your bottom end with that small cam, so if you do use a verter, keep it real mild.
Your biggest problem might be traction, but the trac-lok will help some.
Good luck.
Dave
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 20, 2004
#16
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #16
After your prove to be faster, beat him to tears in front of his family!
 

TheEvII

New Member
Sep 8, 2004
162
0
0
Lakemoor Il.
Dec 20, 2004
#17
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #17
A little more gear wouldn't hurt but you definately need a stall. Don't know if more cam will make that much difference with 289 cubes. It'll probably just idle rougher. The bigger you go with the cam, the more torque you're giving up.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 20, 2004
#18
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #18
I think his combo is perfect for a 289 also. I wouldn't change a thing. I've seen lots of dyno # where that cam and heads made right around 375-400 hp with a 302 shortblock. Only question is the comp ratio? What is it with those heads on a 289 and how did you go about getting that ratio, whatever it may be.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 20, 2004
#19
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #19
TheEvII said:
A little more gear wouldn't hurt but you definately need a stall.
Click to expand...
That cam and intake would not respond well to more gear IMO.
It will rev out of it's optimum rpm range too quickly and compound traction issues.
If a larger cam or single plane intake were introduced, then more gear would be in order.
The same thing hold true for a stall converter. You are supposed to use a stall 500 to 1000 rpm below the start of useable torque... So if his cam and intake start at 1500 rpm, which is probably about right, then you don't need much if any converter. That would just remove useable rpm from the pavement and shorten the power curve... same effect as steep gears.
Dave
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 20, 2004
#20
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #20
ratio411 said:
That cam and intake would not respond well to more gear IMO.
It will rev out of it's optimum rpm range too quickly and compound traction issues.
If a larger cam or single plane intake were introduced, then more gear would be in order.
The same thing hold true for a stall converter. You are supposed to use a stall 500 to 1000 rpm below the start of useable torque... So if his cam and intake start at 1500 rpm, which is probably about right, then you don't need much if any converter. That would just remove useable rpm from the pavement and shorten the power curve... same effect as steep gears.
Dave
Click to expand...
I agree 100%. Ther's too many out there that don't fully understand just what a stall converter does. I've heard quite a few on street cars that sounded like they were doing full-on strip runs, but were moving slow as molasses. If I was him, I'd leave the converter as is. The stock converter on my 68 Merc does just fine behind the warmed slightly 390.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
M
Progress Thread Monkeybutt2000's 89 vert build thread- 408w build in progress
  • Monkeybutt2000
  • Apr 4, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
437
Views
68K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2026
2Blue2
Progress Thread Project 2nd Chance Pony - Status Update
  • JKWilson61
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2020
JKWilson61
The Towering Inferno (the 1970 Mach 1 Version)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2016
smokin joe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?