• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Should I get this 68?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZeroGravity
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#1
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #1
HELP ME!! Should I get this 68?

I am considering buying this car if you guys think its a good deal.

View attachment 524283

Its a 68, Arizona car in Minnesota with no rust, the body & interior is in great condition, Am-Racing wheels, newer 302 V8, auto, completely redone interior, LOTS of new parts/mods... $4000 obo... should I get it ?

Thanks for any help.

Mark
 

J-Scratch

Member
Apr 23, 2004
74
0
6
Jul 7, 2004
#2
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #2
sounds like a good price (no pic)
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#3
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #3
The pic should come in... tell me if its not working.

M.C.
 

RajunCajun

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
180
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#4
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #4
looks like your trying to link it form your email, try clearing your cookies and history and viewing the picture on this link again youll see what we see red x
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#5
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #5
There, tell me if that works.

M.C.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jul 7, 2004
#6
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #6
Looks nice, but from the pics either the rear rims are the wrong offset or the rearend is too wide. Jacked up cars look tacky today so I think you would want to get that rear down so this could become an area where new rims or rearend is need adding $$$ to the project so make sure you investigage. For $4K it looks nice though.
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#7
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #7
Oh, come on... I LOVE the wide and "jacked up" look of the back, looks AWESOME.

But thats just me, so...
 

TireSmoknWindsr

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2002
1,630
0
0
Half past whup'n some import's ass
Jul 7, 2004
#8
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #8
for the info/pic provided...seems like a very good deal to me.
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#9
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #9
Was the 302 auto a very good combo? And what do you guys think about the 68's?

Thanks for the help, Im looking for a first car, and love the classic american muscle cars.

M.C.

(p.s.) It also has glass packs...
 
B

Bonestock2k

Member
Jun 18, 2004
51
0
6
Jul 7, 2004
#10
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #10
If it runs and drives as good as it looks - I think its a good deal. Make sure you go on a test drive for at least 5 miles at hwy speed after the engine is warmed up.
 
M

Mporth8r

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
25
0
0
Victorville, CA
Jul 8, 2004
#11
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #11
Looks like a pretty good deal to me, also. I would keep the high rear end look. We call that the 'stink bug' look and I personally think it looks good on the coupes. Plus, if you drop it you might run into clearance issues if you decide to use full length headers...or so I'm told.
 
B

Bdharn

New Member
Dec 8, 2003
72
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#12
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #12
only one issue with high rear end look if it's done the traditional way. (Air shocks,longer shackles) both can reek havoc on the car. if you like the jacked up rear go with standard eye 5 leaf springs with lower front suspension then your car will have a nice rake and be sound suspesion wise. I replaced my whole suspension on my 67 for under a grand and from the looks of the car it would be worth it. Nice Find
 
7

71vert-pga

New Member
Dec 18, 2003
145
0
0
Bell Chasse, LA
Jul 8, 2004
#13
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #13
Looks like a pretty good deal to me. I would lose the deep-dish wheels though.
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Jul 8, 2004
#14
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #14
ZeroGravity said:
Was the 302 auto a very good combo? And what do you guys think about the 68's?

Thanks for the help, Im looking for a first car, and love the classic american muscle cars.

M.C.

(p.s.) It also has glass packs...
Click to expand...

Sounds like a pretty good deal. The engine and tranny are a great combo. Heck, the 302 survived in Mustangs until 1995. That should tell ya something.

p.s. having glass packs might not be that great. They were cool for what they were in the 70's, but there are much better options out there now as far as exhaust and mufflers go.
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#15
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #15
The car is in AWESOME condition, it looks as if its just been completely redone with ALOT of new parts on it.

66 BLAKE 96 said:
p.s. having glass packs might not be that great. They were cool for what they were in the 70's, but there are much better options out there now as far as exhaust and mufflers go.
Click to expand...

Thats what Ive heard, since Ill probably put a new system in, whats the best way to go? I want somthing that really sounds nice, I dont care if its loud...

Thanks for all the replies.

M.C.
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#16
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #16
Is the 302 a 5.0?
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Jul 8, 2004
#17
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #17
ZeroGravity said:
Thats what Ive heard, since Ill probably put a new system in, whats the best way to go? I want somthing that really sounds nice, I dont care if its loud...

Thanks for all the replies.

M.C.
Click to expand...

I've heard Magnaflow exhaust, and it is pretty great. Good quality sound, not the loudest out there, but the performance is is pretty much as good as any muffler.

The 5.0 engine is a 302. There are some differences over the years (most notably the mid 1980's when it became a roller motor), but it's basically the same design.
 
Z

ZeroGravity

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
12
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#18
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #18
Thanks!
 

J-Scratch

Member
Apr 23, 2004
74
0
6
Jul 8, 2004
#19
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #19
Don't like the rims. Great car/great price. My 67 sits the same as that. Personally I like the 67's better, but I am biased because I own one, and have no need for the reflector on the rear quarters.....
 

Rent-A-Racer

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
187
0
0
Jul 8, 2004
#20
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #20
Looks like you may have a cowl problem. The windows have condensation on the inside. (or it looks that way in the photo.) That's usually a tell tell sign . I would at least check it, especially if your gonna keep it outside!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Trying to decide if I should sell my 70 vert
  • Sixt9
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
149
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Sixt9
S
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
280
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
223
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
389
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?