• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Sick and tired of pinging!! Water injection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangt562
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Aug 10, 2004
#1
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #1
I am sick and tired of pinging so I have decided to get water injection from snow performance. The boost cooler for na cars. Does anyone have this unit and if so can you post a pic of your engine bay so I can see where to mount this thing and if you have it on an NA car was there any performance gains and how do you like it? thanks brothers
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 10, 2004
#2
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #2
You should be able to fix pinging by adjusting the timing. Water injection on a NA motor seems like overkill to me.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 10, 2004
#3
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #3
You are going to lose performance, no doubt about it.

If you are serious about solving your pinging problems, why don't you have your car dyno tuned or get a WB O2? That would tell you if you are lean due to lack of fuel.

If your a/f is good, then you probably have hot spots on the combustion chambers and need the top end cleaned.

Solve the problem, don't "bypass" it.
Scott
 
L

law

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
290
0
0
Aug 10, 2004
#4
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #4
Forgive my ignorance but what is a WB 02?
 

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Aug 10, 2004
#5
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #5
mo_dingo said:
You are going to lose performance, no doubt about it.

Scott
Click to expand...

Do you know Ill loose performance or are you just guessing? Please tell me why ill loose performance cause the web page says Ill gain like 10-15 ponies.

HERE IS THE AD

Naturally aspirated/stock compression:
With naturally aspirated engines with less than 10:1 compression, water/methanol is used typically in warm climates to get the intake temps back to 60°f. Benefits include: 10-15 HP increases from air density increases and full timing, Increased gas mileage, and carbon free combustion chambers. Activation is by a throttle switch adjusted for onset engine load. With this application, the nozzle is sized so that no more than 10% of total fuel consumption at peak flywheel HP is injected.

http://www.snowperformance.net/proddetail.asp?prod=auto025
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Aug 10, 2004
#6
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #6
I just bought one with the extra tank and I will be installing mine possibly next week. I gotta move the battery to the trunk to accomodate the kit.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 10, 2004
#7
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #7
i doubt you will actually gain any power....the deal is this...it works like water injection or and intercooler on a boosted car...they dont actually give you anypower...they just cool the charge temps to make things safer...in reality an intercooler will usually LOSE power at the same boost levels because the cooling will cause a pressure drop across the intercooler. i bet you gain 0hp from that mod, if you dont lose any....

you need to FIX the problem and not try and find away around it....
 

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Aug 11, 2004
#8
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #8
I have tried everything already!!!

Every Da** suggestion that has EVER been suggested on how to fix pinging I have done. New ect/act DONE, new o2 sensors DONE, colder plugs DONE, bigger injectrors, DONE, seafoam the engine DONE, cleaning the maf DONE, etc etc. Now this is the final resort. The water injection WILL clean the carbon, and cool the chamber to prevent detonation. SO ANYONE who knows what there talking about please chime in im am tired of all these cliche/cookie cutter answers. and if you feel tempted again to say "you need to fix the problem and not find away around it" please save you post !!!!


Frustrated!
 

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Aug 11, 2004
#9
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #9
ohh yea

I have also lowered the timing to 8, and got a afpr. SO dont suggest that either
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Aug 11, 2004
#10
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #10
You never mentioned trying this.

If you pull out the spout and lock your timing @ 24 degrees I am sure it will stop all together. Period.
If this does not work for you I will eat my words and never suggest it to another Stanger as long as I live.
BTW:This has worked for 5 people here that have pm'd me about pinging. Oh and they were all as frustrated as you were.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 11, 2004
#11
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #11
In the gt pcm the spark tables are really agressive at some points. At mid level loads I've seen the spark climb to as high as 46 degrees in datalogs where the gt's pcm spark tables are still stock.

You can draw your own conclusions but IMHO the pcm with the stock gt cal file is just prone to the ping thing cause I think that even when everything is normal with parts, sensors, and such the tune as delivered from Ford is right on the verge of pinging so there is not much room for anything to go wrong without having to deal with pinging.

I would suspect Ford did it that way for emissions or gas milage or both.

Later
Grady
 

RydeOn

Licensed to Chill
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2000
6,273
1
77
orange county, CA
Aug 11, 2004
#12
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #12
VIPERn94Five-0 said:
i doubt you will actually gain any power....the deal is this...it works like water injection or and intercooler on a boosted car...they dont actually give you anypower...they just cool the charge temps to make things safer...in reality an intercooler will usually LOSE power at the same boost levels because the cooling will cause a pressure drop across the intercooler. i bet you gain 0hp from that mod, if you dont lose any....

you need to FIX the problem and not try and find away around it....
Click to expand...
Actaully with an intercooler (not aftercooler, waterinjection,etc.) you will get more power due to a denser air charge. But your right about what you said for the most part. With water injection I think you lose a little power.
 

94TURBO5 O

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
2,509
0
0
VA
Aug 11, 2004
#13
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #13
law said:
Forgive my ignorance but what is a WB 02?
Click to expand...
Wide band A/F O2 sensors
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 11, 2004
#14
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #14
mustangt562 said:
Every Da** suggestion that has EVER been suggested on how to fix pinging I have done. New ect/act DONE, new o2 sensors DONE, colder plugs DONE, bigger injectrors, DONE, seafoam the engine DONE, cleaning the maf DONE, etc etc. Now this is the final resort. The water injection WILL clean the carbon, and cool the chamber to prevent detonation. SO ANYONE who knows what there talking about please chime in im am tired of all these cliche/cookie cutter answers. and if you feel tempted again to say "you need to fix the problem and not find away around it" please save you post !!!! Frustrated!
Click to expand...

Look, ass, you asked us for answers to a question that we hear about every day. Trust what you read here, or take the car to a damn mechanic & have them fix it.

Don't be mad at us. Think of it like a positive coefficient exponential function. As your anger towards us increased, our willingness to even read your posts will decrease exponentially.

With that said, you have not done EVERYTHING we have suggested. I suggested 3 things to your, but you completely ignored them.

I would ask you to re-read my post, but I fear you will not have the tranquillity to do so.

I asked you if you have.....

#1 Put the car on a dyno to check a/f ratio & get a custom chip.
#2 Purchased a Wideband Oxygen sensor & checked a/f ratio
#3 Actually cleaned the topend of the motor (i.e. remove heads and grind cc's and piston tops to bare metal)

#1 & #3 together, or #2 & #3 together will cure your pinging problem.

1/2 will tell you if you have enough fuel coming in. 3 will remove any trace of carbon left on the motor. Seafoam will not even come close to what a grinder will do.

Is this "non-cookie cutter" enough for you.

Shall I speak of the stock spark/fuel tables & how they suck ass on our cars?
Scott
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 12, 2004
#15
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #15
RydeOn said:
Actaully with an intercooler (not aftercooler, waterinjection,etc.) you will get more power due to a denser air charge. But your right about what you said for the most part. With water injection I think you lose a little power.
Click to expand...

negative, an intercooler will cause a pressure drop, meaning a lower psi, and more than likley less horsepower....intercoolers themselves add no power...its the ability to cool the air/run more boost safely that are the advanteges of an intercooler....


Anthony
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 12, 2004
#16
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #16
WHile we're on the subject of going to the ectreme to get rid of the pinging, I pretty much but my TwEECer for that. Expensive, but very effective, lol!
 

RydeOn

Licensed to Chill
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2000
6,273
1
77
orange county, CA
Aug 12, 2004
#17
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #17
Nope. Played around with this stuff before and you are not comparing correctly. Possibly with a blower you would lose boost through a pressure drop due to the blower not being able to spin fast enough for a given pulley size. But on a turbo, as long as its in its effeciency range, you will boost what you want to boost no ifs ands or buts. And for a given boost level, your going to make more power with cooler, denser air than without. If an intercooler worked on an NA application (it doesnt due to not being able to cool under ambient temp) then you would get more power too. The only reason water injection doesnt gain any power is because the water displaces the space where the hotter air was, but it works great for getting rid of detontation.
 

Last5.0

Active Member
Nov 9, 2003
404
1
26
Aug 12, 2004
#18
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #18
As far as the Snow kit fitting in the engine compartment and having to relocate the battery.....

My kit came with a bulkhead fitting (like what's on their bottle that comes with the kit) that you install into your washer fluid reservoir and use that.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 12, 2004
#19
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #19
RydeOn said:
Nope. Played around with this stuff before and you are not comparing correctly. Possibly with a blower you would lose boost through a pressure drop due to the blower not being able to spin fast enough for a given pulley size. But on a turbo, as long as its in its effeciency range, you will boost what you want to boost no ifs ands or buts. And for a given boost level, your going to make more power with cooler, denser air than without. If an intercooler worked on an NA application (it doesnt due to not being able to cool under ambient temp) then you would get more power too. The only reason water injection doesnt gain any power is because the water displaces the space where the hotter air was, but it works great for getting rid of detontation.
Click to expand...
there is goingto be a pressure drop as the compressed air passes through the intercooler, maybe im generalizing all intercoolers and should say im talking about a good sized FMIC....


Anthony
 

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Aug 12, 2004
#20
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #20
hey last5.0

where did you mount the pump? any pics?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
956
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Sunday at 5:40 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
50
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 5:40 PM
AeroCoupe
S
Engine Belt routing with supercharger and smog/ac/ps delete
  • Steve6482
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
57
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 15, 2026
Steve6482
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
210
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
494
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?