Sick of all the mufflers out there

deadlast

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
495
0
0
Belmont, MA
im tired of hearing magnaflows, flowmaster and all the other stuff. i currently have dynomax and want to change. i want something that sounds really different, so i have been eyeing the hooker aerochamber mufflers. I have never heard them before and would be interested to see what they sound like. Of course, i could always buy spintech mufflers. What should i do guys?
 
If you want to change the sound of your car, just mufflers isn't going to do the job. All mufflers do is muffle the sound, they might make it deeper, higher, louder, quieter, to a point, but the reality is the exaust is making the same sound. So what you need to do to get a different sound is a different mid-pipe, and headers make a big difference, and a cam would really change it. I had regular delta-flow 2 chamber flows and when I swapped to longtubes and an off road H pipe, really made a difference. Just changing mufflers I don't think you will be satisfied. Maby a little, but in no-time you'll be bored with it again, promise. It will still sound like a typical five-oh with a catback. I have heard dynomaxes on cars with full exaust and cams, and I think they sound really wicked. Dynomaxes are really good at bringing out the true sound of the engine. It's your engine that needs the change.
 
I had the Hooker Aero Chambers on my 95 with an off road H and it really sounded good. Different than the Flowmaster for sure. The in-car sound was really awesome!! Just sounded clean, and didnt drone like the flo's do.
 
90mustangGT said:
If you want to change the sound of your car, just mufflers isn't going to do the job. All mufflers do is muffle the sound, they might make it deeper, higher, louder, quieter, to a point, but the reality is the exaust is making the same sound. So what you need to do to get a different sound is a different mid-pipe, and headers make a big difference, and a cam would really change it. I had regular delta-flow 2 chamber flows and when I swapped to longtubes and an off road H pipe, really made a difference. Just changing mufflers I don't think you will be satisfied. Maby a little, but in no-time you'll be bored with it again, promise. It will still sound like a typical five-oh with a catback. I have heard dynomaxes on cars with full exaust and cams, and I think they sound really wicked. Dynomaxes are really good at bringing out the true sound of the engine. It's your engine that needs the change.

I agree and disagree on this one. The engine does have a HUGE deciding factor on exhaust note, since obviously it is what's making the sound...BUT to say that mufflers have little effect is a bit false....that's like saying all woodwind musical instruments make the same sound because of the human that blows into it....make sense?

I believe each of the 3 main parts of a Mustang's exhaust contributes it's own touch to the exhaust note....because i've tried and had just about every concievable variation possible. Every style of header, every style of mid pipe, and more catbacks than i can remember. If you wanna sound different, you're gonna have to experiment. H pipes usually tend to provide a more rumbling and deeper tone than an X, which usually gives a raspy rippy kind of sound. The muffler then plays off of this. Take for example, Flowmaster 3 chambers vs. Dynomax Race Bullets....there's NO way you can say they sound anything like the same muffler, or even engine/car for that matter.

Like i said though, i do agree that engine configuration does have a big effect. I've got a friend who had the exact same exhaust as i did, from header back, but his engine is a 347 where mine is a mostly stock 302. His was both much louder and much raspier/rippy than mine sounded. I actually know another guy who had the same setup on a blown 408...THAT was a whole different beast.

Right now i'm running MAC full lengths, a Dr. Gas X pipe, and 1 chamber Flowmasters....my car doesnt sound like your typical Flowmaster exhaust because of the X pipe (which sounds different than other X's that i've run, like MAC and BBK). The mufflers are typical 2 chamber Flows with the back chamber removed. That's how you get a different sound...you get creative.
 
well yes i obviously know the sound of the car doesnt depend on the muffler, but the combination of engine parts, and other exhaust pieces. There are dif tones for mufflers tho, like straight thru and chambered. I have the race bullets now, and i like them but i want a change. Besides, since i need to replace one (big dent) i might as well change all together. At the same time im going to be getting some type of o/r midpipe, h or x isnt decided but thats beside the point. I have heard SLP on a few cars and it has sounded wicked... i might end up going that route.
 
wht93gtEd said:
- Factory headers
- MAC Pro-Chamber (catless)
- SLP Loudmouth cat-back (lm 1)

idle & rev:
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-idle

drive by acceleration:
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-drive-by

in-car burnout & acceleration (windows down):
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-in-car

listen up to help your decision...also, I can take any additional videos upon request. It sounds completely different than a lot of other Mustangs I hear driving around here.

Geez, 8mb internet connection and that still won't load :mad:
 
wht93gtEd said:
- Factory headers
- MAC Pro-Chamber (catless)
- SLP Loudmouth cat-back (lm 1)

idle & rev:
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-idle

drive by acceleration:
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-drive-by

in-car burnout & acceleration (windows down):
http://media.putfile.com/1993-Mustang-in-car

listen up to help your decision...also, I can take any additional videos upon request. It sounds completely different than a lot of other Mustangs I hear driving around here.

I have the same setup but with BBK shorty headers and i love the way it sounds.

It doesnt have that generic mustang with flowmasters sound.