• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Side window louver pics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpentico
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 3, 2005
#1
  • May 3, 2005
  • #1
Hey all,

I just installed a set of 3D Carbon side window louvers.

My paint guy said prep was easy, and the paint adhered fine.

Installation was a bit tricky.... since using 3M tape, you only get one shot at getting them centered properly. Good luck!!!

The louvers DO NOT have slots to let you see through.
However, the blackout stickers look pretty darn good.

I had the opportunity to see a 2005 Roush Stage 1 upclose this weekend.
Roush louvers are functional, but are larger, boxy, and still do not provide a good view through the side window. (Not that you really need one)

I've gotten lots of complements on the new look.

If the photos do not post.... someone please let me know how to do it.
(I'm an internet moron)
 

Attachments

  • sidelouvers.webp
    33.7 KB · Views: 472
  • sidelouvers2.webp
    56 KB · Views: 464

GTJade

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
18
0
0
May 3, 2005
#2
  • May 3, 2005
  • #2
Looks good! Thanks for sharing the info/pic's.
 
M

Mike06_10pm

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
98
0
0
May 3, 2005
#3
  • May 3, 2005
  • #3
looks good i like it! i know im being really stubborn but can u define what 'functional' louver's are, rather than yours? i still dont get it, besides the fact that the functional ones replace the window?
 
G

GT300

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
16
0
0
May 3, 2005
#4
  • May 3, 2005
  • #4
Nice, where did you get them and how much did you pay?
 

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 3, 2005
#5
  • May 3, 2005
  • #5
Mike06_10pm said:
looks good i like it! i know im being really stubborn but can u define what 'functional' louver's are, rather than yours? i still dont get it, besides the fact that the functional ones replace the window?
Click to expand...


You can "see" out of what I call functional louvers.

The ones I purchased from 3D Carbon, and many others are basically plastic covers that mount to the side window glass and completly block it out. The slots are really just black stickers to make it appear like there are slots. Functional louvers like the ones that come on the Roush version do not replace the side window, they mount to the body. They have actual slots that allow viewing out of the side window... but it is a VERY limited view.

Clear as mud.... right?
 

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 3, 2005
#6
  • May 3, 2005
  • #6
GT300 said:
Nice, where did you get them and how much did you pay?
Click to expand...

www.3Dcarbon.com

I got mine pre-production..... but the current price is $149.

At this time you have to get them painted yourself.
Installation is tricky.
 
H

hurdlinmasta

New Member
Dec 25, 2004
85
0
0
May 3, 2005
#7
  • May 3, 2005
  • #7
just seeing out isnt funtional. Real funtional louvers directed wind from the side to the spoiler. I.E. Eleanor GT500 from the olden days.
 
A

allie

New Member
Dec 30, 2004
34
0
0
May 3, 2005
#8
  • May 3, 2005
  • #8
i dont think they look right at all

mpentico said:
Hey all,

I just installed a set of 3D Carbon side window louvers.

My paint guy said prep was easy, and the paint adhered fine.

Installation was a bit tricky.... since using 3M tape, you only get one shot at getting them centered properly. Good luck!!!

The louvers DO NOT have slots to let you see through.
However, the blackout stickers look pretty darn good.

I had the opportunity to see a 2005 Roush Stage 1 upclose this weekend.
Roush louvers are functional, but are larger, boxy, and still do not provide a good view through the side window. (Not that you really need one)

I've gotten lots of complements on the new look.

If the photos do not post.... someone please let me know how to do it.
(I'm an internet moron)
Click to expand...
i think they look all wrong,,, the best ones were on the mid 60's mustang coupe,, they were more inset and looked right not like these that puff out.
 
A

allie

New Member
Dec 30, 2004
34
0
0
May 3, 2005
#9
  • May 3, 2005
  • #9
i meant the mustang fastback like in this pic

mpentico said:
Hey all,

I just installed a set of 3D Carbon side window louvers.

My paint guy said prep was easy, and the paint adhered fine.

Installation was a bit tricky.... since using 3M tape, you only get one shot at getting them centered properly. Good luck!!!

The louvers DO NOT have slots to let you see through.
However, the blackout stickers look pretty darn good.

I had the opportunity to see a 2005 Roush Stage 1 upclose this weekend.
Roush louvers are functional, but are larger, boxy, and still do not provide a good view through the side window. (Not that you really need one)

I've gotten lots of complements on the new look.

If the photos do not post.... someone please let me know how to do it.
(I'm an internet moron)
Click to expand...
like in this pic, thats how it should look
 

Attachments

  • 65_Mustang_Fastback_storefront.webp
    23.8 KB · Views: 310

jlisle01

New Member
Dec 29, 2004
250
1
0
McAlester,OK
May 3, 2005
#10
  • May 3, 2005
  • #10
I likeee!!!! I know they don't look like the ones on, say, a '68 GT, but I don't know of anyone who's making a set that replaces the window glass. That's the only way it will look right, I think. I'm still waiting for CDC to release the smooth sided ones they have on their site but I may give up and get these instead. Only one question, why 3D's and not the ones from SSE. I think the ones from SSE are "functional", at least, in the visibility area anyway. Not questioning your taste, just wondering if you know something about SSE products that I should.
 
I

ILikeBond

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
16
0
0
May 3, 2005
#11
  • May 3, 2005
  • #11
The MRTs are flat and look the best, IMHO - plus, they install on hinges so you can swing them out and clean the window. Unfortunately, it looks as though their delivery continues to be held up and its unsure when they'll actually come out and we can see some pictures.

http://www.mrt-direct.com/2005/Pages/louvers.php
 
B

BMSTANG

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
23
0
0
May 4, 2005
#12
  • May 4, 2005
  • #12
I'm not saying they look bad. But something about using tape and stickers just doesn't seem right. Its a Mustang, not a Honda.
 

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 4, 2005
#13
  • May 4, 2005
  • #13
Well to answer some of these posts:

Yes functional louvers would be used to re-direct airflow.... but I figure window louvers are more for blocking sunlight or just plain looks. Side window louvers for the 05 are just for looks. It would be nice to have the quarter panel appear like a 60's model stang.... but I'm not ready to start cutting body panels and designing my own car body. I'll stick to simple add ons parts for now.

Street Scenes louvers are very similar to 3D Carbon. However, I did not like the rounded/cupped trailing ends of the louver.
Availability was also a factor.

MRT louvers are OK. But IMO they look too "sharp edged" or technically modern... where I am attempting to blend my 05 towards the retro-60's. look. The MRT louver edge completly covers the window. I'm guessing the seal between the body panel and louver is therefor difficult to maintain. I did not want a louver that slapped against my paint.

It is sad that for some add-on we must use 3M tape..... a necessary evil.
I can not imagine any parts other than my louvers, now or in the future that will be "taped on" to my car.
No need to get ugly and call it "Honda".
I am trying very hard not to "ricify" my car.
 
T

toolsmack

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
2
0
0
May 4, 2005
#14
  • May 4, 2005
  • #14
I like it

I debated between the SSE and the 3d Carbon Louvers before I decided to go with scoops instead.....I'll post pics of them when I get them added.

One question.....how much did you have to pay to get them painted? Were they painted black inside and then color matched outside?

Thanks
 

mpentico

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
181
0
0
May 4, 2005
#15
  • May 4, 2005
  • #15
toolsmack said:
I debated between the SSE and the 3d Carbon Louvers before I decided to go with scoops instead.....I'll post pics of them when I get them added.

One question.....how much did you have to pay to get them painted? Were they painted black inside and then color matched outside?

Thanks
Click to expand...

The louvers came from 3D Carbon black un-painted plastic.

I painted the interior side black myself.

I had a local guy paint the exterior side Satin Silver.
He only charged me $75 for prep and paint for both louvers and my radiator cover.
 

JHO2theIZZO

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
12
1
0
May 4, 2005
#16
  • May 4, 2005
  • #16
looks good
 

jlisle01

New Member
Dec 29, 2004
250
1
0
McAlester,OK
May 4, 2005
#17
  • May 4, 2005
  • #17
Thanks, now that I look at the pics closer, I see what you mean. I think I'm going to give up on CDC and go with 3D carbon. Thanks for the useful post.
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
May 4, 2005
#18
  • May 4, 2005
  • #18
hurdlinmasta said:
just seeing out isnt funtional. Real funtional louvers directed wind from the side to the spoiler. I.E. Eleanor GT500 from the olden days.
Click to expand...

First of all, there's nothing "olden days" about Eleanor. The Eleanor scoops were designed in the 90's and are different than vintage '67 scoops, neither of which are functional.

Eleanor


68 Shelby GT500


Second, no classic Mustang/Shelby was fitted with 1/4 louver-over-glass "louvers" (I'm not talking about back glass here). 65-68 fastbacks had louvered vents. Their funtion was a "flow-thru" ventalation system, venting interior air outside the car.

Just a little classic education from the resident old schooler.
 
R

royb

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
273
0
0
May 4, 2005
#19
  • May 4, 2005
  • #19
Looks great.
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
May 4, 2005
#20
  • May 4, 2005
  • #20
66 BLAKE 96 said:
First of all, there's nothing "olden days" about Eleanor. The Eleanor scoops were designed in the 90's and are different than vintage '67 scoops, neither of which are functional...



Just a little classic education from the resident old schooler.
Click to expand...


Actually on the 67-98 Shelby fastbacks the quarter window scoops were "air extractors" that use a venturi effect to suck air out of the interior. So they were functional. How well they functioned is another story.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
594
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SOLD [Minnesota] 2014 Ford Mustang GT | Grabber Blue | 6MT Coupe
  • Mycelus
  • Mar 20, 2023
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
1
Views
6K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 27, 2023
Mycelus
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
T
×Engine knock that sounds like it's underneath car behind drivers side tire
  • Timothyeg
  • Sep 18, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 20, 2020
Timothyeg
T
J
Worth letting my 88 LX go for a 88 T-top GT?
  • jrp27540
  • Oct 6, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2018
billison
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?