SLP LM II vs. regular magnaflows

[corgan]

Can anybody compare the 2 as in which one would be louder and deeper?

I'm going with a O/R X and I was set on the magnaflows at first but I believe I want something a LITTLE louder. So no LM I's or packs for me.

 

[helty]

the II's are louder than the regular magnaflows by far. i have a vid, standby.....

nevermind the links in my sig. here you go anyway

http://media.putfile.com/SLP1_0001

they are actually deeper than some chambered muffs but still loud (not obnoxious) when you get on it. i love the II's a lot better than my I's. you wont regret them with an o/r x.

 

[03ghoststang]

go with the LM II's just like helty said

 

[corgan]

Thanks for the sound clip helty. How would you rate the sound quality of the lmII to packs or stingers? At first I considered the packs but they sound a little to blatty for me with an O/R X. Do you think the sound quality is better than that with the LMII?

 

[helty]

Thanks for the sound clip helty. How would you rate the sound quality of the lmII to packs or stingers? At first I considered the packs but they sound a little to blatty for me with an O/R X. Do you think the sound quality is better than that with the LMII?

yes, the II's are in the same league with the stingers and packs but have their own distinct tone. i agree with you, the packs are too "blatty" for my taste. for me the stingers have too much "bass" if thats what you wanna call it, although i would recommend them if you dont want the LMII's.

the II's arent as sloppy as the packs (with O/R X) IMO. i think the packs sound better with a catted X. they (LMII's) have a nice deep rumble at lower rpm and sound mean as hell after 3250rpm. they are just as loud as the packs but not as raspy. a bit deeper. they take a week or two to break in, so at first they sound pretty quiet. but once they break in they sound great. Loud but not obnoxious.

my biased opinion:
1. Loudmouth IIs
2. Stingers
3. Mac Flowpaths