• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Sn-95 vs. Fox axles. Pic comparsion.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangOwner
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2007
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Aug 18, 2007
#1
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #1
Well before i tore my car all apart i was running a 18x9 with a 24mm offset and sn-95 axles. I was getting a little rubbing on the rear fender lip. Not much but enough to piss me off. My orignal plan was to buy some Moser 5 lug stock length axles and some North cobra caliper mounting brace and be done. That would suck my wheels in 3/4 of an inch and fix the problem. Well i was scared that they would give my rear end the "sucked in" look. So before i forked out over $400.00 bucks for the axles and braces i thought i'd steel my neighbors stock length axles and see what it looks like. Well i was right, it sucks my rear rims in WAY to far. It looks completely ghey. You might not be able to tell to much from the pictures but trust me in person it looks really bad. And it was raining so i couldn't get the best of all pictures. So instead of doing the axle swap i think i'm just gonna roll the rear fender lips and call it good. That should fix my problem and not cost $400 bucks. And yes i could put in the shorter fox axles and then space them out so they sit perfect but i dont want to run a spacer. And right now with the sn-95 axles the rear sits out further then the front and i like that. And i'm also getting front and rear Maximum Motorsports coil over setup so i can also adjust the ride height if it still rubs. Either way it will be fixed. So i thought before i drop the rear end i'd take some pictures of what i'm talking about. I've never seen any side by side comparsion pics before so here yah go.

The passenger side has the sn-95 axles and the drivers side has the fox axles.

View attachment 369436
View attachment 369438
View attachment 369440
View attachment 369442
View attachment 369444
View attachment 369446

Fox on the right, sn-95 on the left. The fox axles have longer studs but the height is the same so you can see the difference between the two axles as far as length goes.
View attachment 369448

Edit: The best pics are #1 and #2
 

KAILUAZ

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
333
0
0
St Pete, FL via Kailua, HI
Aug 18, 2007
#2
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #2
I'm going to run a LSC rear and just roll the fenders also.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,248
17,929
224
Massachusetts
Aug 18, 2007
#3
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #3
Damn, everyone has those Kumho 712's these days
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Aug 18, 2007
#4
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #4
Mustang5L5 said:
Damn, everyone has those Kumho 712's these days
Click to expand...

Ha well that was the best performance tire for the buck i could get at the time. I think they are a great tire but now i'm going to Good Year Eagles F1 gs-d3. The kumhos are like brand new with maybe 800 miles on them ha, can we say burn out? But the eagles are $244.00 whole sale cost. And i think i paid like 112? wholesale for the kumhos ha. So thats why i bought them. But it was a waste afterall ha. Gotta love family owned dealerships ha.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,248
17,929
224
Massachusetts
Aug 18, 2007
#5
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #5
I have a set of Kumho's on my 5.0. Can't wait to burn them off. I put some Bridgestone Potenza S-03's on my GT and OMG it's an incredible tire!! It's like glue in the dry or wet. Just last week i was driving on the hgihway in the pouring rain and the car felt solid and stuck to the road. Never had that feeling with the Kumhos
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Aug 18, 2007
#6
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #6
try cooper zeon 2xs i bought mine last year for $85 each that, is a 245-45-17. 18 im sure are a little more.. something to look into. there a sweet ass tire imo
 

DEFWISH

Member
Feb 25, 2006
87
0
8
Wichita, Ks
Aug 18, 2007
#7
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #7
personally i put some shorter ones back in, cuz the sn95s kinda pushed my 9inch wides out barely a little more than i wanted. an i jus used the sn95 studs cuz the reear disks
 
S

sal

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
79
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Aug 18, 2007
#8
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #8
View attachment 369358

View attachment 369360



View attachment 369364

 

Attachments

  • IMG_2496.webp
    49.7 KB · Views: 117
  • img377.webp
    27.2 KB · Views: 103
N

niklid05

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
140
0
0
Kutztown PA 19530
Aug 18, 2007
#9
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #9
nice notch....
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Aug 18, 2007
#10
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #10
I'm confused on why you just posted a bunch of pictures of your notch
And that article only shows the difference between the two axles sitting on the ground. I said i've never seen a comparison of fox vs sn-95 axles on a car. So i took pictures to show you, you can't get a better side by side comparison then i just gave you.
 
S

sal

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
79
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Aug 18, 2007
#11
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #11
niklid05 said:
nice notch....
Click to expand...


Thank you. I was just showing the fitment of various wheels with the sn-95 axleshafts.

91FoxSaleenGTLX

Thank you for your side by side comparison, I also did a 5-lug conversion on my 1990 Fox Saleen replica. However that conversion was front disc and rear drum, using the stock axleshafts. Here's a pic of my car with Saleen wheels...



Here are those same wheels on one of my SVOs...
 

Attachments

  • img128-1.webp
    31.2 KB · Views: 135
  • img110.webp
    47.1 KB · Views: 145
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Aug 18, 2007
#12
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #12
yeah the sn-95 axles with 24mm offset is the best look.
 

1993SSP

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2001
1,194
0
37
Ky
Aug 19, 2007
#13
  • Aug 19, 2007
  • #13
91FoxSaleenGTLX said:
yeah the sn-95 axles with 24mm offset is the best look.
Click to expand...

I didnt think 24mm offset wheels with SN95 axles on the rear was possible?
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Aug 19, 2007
#14
  • Aug 19, 2007
  • #14
1993SSP said:
I didnt think 24mm offset wheels with SN95 axles on the rear was possible?
Click to expand...

Sure it is.... i Just need my fender lips rolled and it'll be mint
View attachment 369216
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
T
Fox Convertible top issues
  • TDM389
  • Feb 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
291
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2026
General karthief
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
A
SN95 Hydroboost in a Fox | Brake lines
  • arc_jpiv
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?