• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

SN65, Bob Kurgan, Speed Inc. Dyno results

  • Thread starter Thread starter SN65
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2006

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Jun 24, 2006
#1
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #1
We took the SN65 to Speed Inc (Schaumburg, IL) to tune the beast up after the Whipple install. The install itself went pretty well. We did struggle a bit with the EGR valve plumbing and the correct torque for the manifold bolts, but we did have everything ready for the Tuesday evening session at Speed. The people at Speed really went out of their way to fit the car in to their incredibly busy schedule. Without their help, we never would have been able to complete the project in time for Good Guys Columbus.

Anyway… I digress.

We showed up at Speed at about 6:00 and Larry got us into the shop and onto the dyno in short order. Bob Kurgan showed up at about 6:30 and we were ready to rock.

I was impressed by the way they went about their task. Larry took the drivers seat and Bob positioned himself at shotgun. This way, Bob could monitor the stats as Larry ran the dyno and applied the power. Also, they didn’t just climb in the car and nail the accelerator to the floor. They brought the car up slowly; all the while Bob was locked in on the computer curves watching for any danger signs. I felt very comfortable with them running the show.

When they did get to the point where they made their first real pull, I was confident that everything was going to be AOK. Even though there were a few guys hanging around the shop telling me dyno horror stories. They were just trying to rattle my cage a bit. You know what I mean. Exploding engines. Trashed blowers. Burnt pistons and valves.

The first pull generated about 520 RWHP. Larry and Bob examined the curves and went about the fine tuning process. These guys are very professional in the way they go about their job. When they are going through the process, they do not put up with any interruptions. I started to ask Bob a few questions about what he was doing and he politely told be “Leave me the ((@*# alone, I am working here”. Well, he did not actually say that, but I did get the drift.

After that the evening was pretty much uneventful. Exciting, yes, but uneventful, which is a good thing when dyno tuning any engine. They kept tweaking this and that in an attempt to get a conservative 550 RWHP. Which, by the end of the evening, they did. The last pull of the evening netted us 540 RWHP on a heat soaked blower. I am sure that if we let the whole setup sit overnight we would have bested the 550 point. But our goal was not to see how large a number we could generate on the dyno. Our goal was to have everything dialed in properly. We do not want this setup to go off like some faulty WWII surplus hand grenade. And after Larry and Bob installed a conservative tune, we are sure the car is safe at any speed.

Speaking of speed, the car is a totally different animal. I though it was quick at 400 RWHP. This upgrade (running the 17 PSI pulley) has upped the HP by about 37%. And the torque is just ridiculous. The feeling you get when you peg the accelerator is hard to describe. Your peripheral vision fades away as you concentrate on the road ahead. Everything in your line of sight is magnified as all the objects off to the side merge together and become a blur. The objects directly in front of you start getting closer at an alarming rate of speed. The feeling is kind of like a Star Trek special effect. You know the one. Where the Enterprise goes into warp speed and the stars become a blur as the ship rockets past them…

As you can tell, I am totally thrilled with the way this project has turned out. I need to get the SN65 onto a road course and see what she can really do.

One side note. There seams to be a ghost in the machine. For one reason or another, the computer has the incoming and manifold temp sensors confused. The computer thinks that the incoming air is the manifold and the manifold is the incoming air. We are going to take the car to Ford next week to see if they can shed some light on this little abnormality.

With that said, the push is on for GGC. Be there or be square. Also, look for details and footage of the blower upgrade on an upcoming episode of V8TV.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jun 24, 2006
#2
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #2
congrats!
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Jun 24, 2006
#3
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #3
"One side note. There seams to be a ghost in the machine. For one reason or another, the computer has the incoming and manifold temp sensors confused. The computer thinks that the incoming air is the manifold and the manifold is the incoming air. We are going to take the car to Ford next week to see if they can shed some light on this little abnormality."

This is your chance to really confuse the guys at ford, unless they know what you are bringing them
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Jun 24, 2006
#4
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #4
Sounds great! KB twin screws are wonderful devices...instant torque at any rpm. My 2+2 will eventually be wearing one [on top of a 331 stroker].
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jun 24, 2006
#5
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #5
sounds good.........................but i dont care who you are or how much ***** you know, anybody working on my car and gives a smart a$$ answer would see my tail lights real quick.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jun 25, 2006
#6
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #6
iskwezm said:
sounds good.........................but i dont care who you are or how much ***** you know, anybody working on my car and gives a smart a$$ answer would see my tail lights real quick.
Click to expand...


There is a big problem with what you say............































I didnt know you ever let anyone else work on your car.....LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
350
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
E
Nightmare after tune install!
  • EnemyofTyranny
  • Mar 29, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
441
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
89ripper
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
347
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
P
High idle issue and leaking after running.
  • PHoffman
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
482
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2024
General karthief
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
734
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?