• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Some 5.0 Advice: 3k to build

  • Thread starter Thread starter CazSN95
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2011
C

CazSN95

New Member
Jun 8, 2011
7
0
1
Jun 14, 2011
#1
  • Jun 14, 2011
  • #1
Alright, so I have a 95 GT, 5.0. It has roughly 215k miles on it (thats my estimation, true miles are unknown.) I have three thousand to put into the engine.

My question is, what would be the most worthwhile to do? For performance, I am wanting to do a 331 stroker kit and heads (possibly GT40). I want to get my moneys worth though and am curious to see what people here think. I want to avoid making rookie mistakes.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 14, 2011
#2
  • Jun 14, 2011
  • #2
Lower mileage explorer motor and a supercharger.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jun 15, 2011
#3
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #3
CazSN95 said:
Alright, so I have a 95 GT, 5.0. It has roughly 215k miles on it (thats my estimation, true miles are unknown.) I have three thousand to put into the engine.

My question is, what would be the most worthwhile to do? For performance, I am wanting to do a 331 stroker kit and heads (possibly GT40). I want to get my moneys worth though and am curious to see what people here think. I want to avoid making rookie mistakes.
Click to expand...

There is no point of adding cubes if you dont add a nice set of heads... gt40's wont cut it...

Your going to put 3k in to a bottom end to make well under 300hp...



Either rebuild the bottom end. Hone/0.030 Overbore and get a nice set of aluminum heads.

Or like already stated used explorer motor and a blower is probably the best way to go.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 15, 2011
#4
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #4
i'm with Adam. you're going to spend most of that money just in the bottom end and then have nothing left for a good top end. if the bottom end is a concern, then get either a explorer motor or have your's refreshed. Then get a nice top end kit for the remainder.

the old saying there is no replacement for displacement is still true, but only to an extent that you can utilize those added cubes. You can reach 350 on a properly built 302. besides, you might as well jump up to a 347 if your keeping it n/a. it's the same price.
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 15, 2011
#5
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #5
CazSN95 said:
Alright, so I have a 95 GT, 5.0. It has roughly 215k miles on it (thats my estimation, true miles are unknown.) I have three thousand to put into the engine.

My question is, what would be the most worthwhile to do? For performance, I am wanting to do a 331 stroker kit and heads (possibly GT40). I want to get my moneys worth though and am curious to see what people here think. I want to avoid making rookie mistakes.
Click to expand...


Are you who I think you are?
 
C

CazSN95

New Member
Jun 8, 2011
7
0
1
Jun 15, 2011
#6
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #6
rio95 said:
Are you who I think you are?
Click to expand...

Highly doubt it. Never been a member here before and this is my first mustang.
 
C

CazSN95

New Member
Jun 8, 2011
7
0
1
Jun 15, 2011
#7
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #7
So, if I dont want to get the explorer motor, your suggestion is to refresh the motor, hone/0.030 overbore and get a nice set of heads?

Another question, opinion on buying a crate engine for $3.5k?
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 15, 2011
#8
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #8
crate engines are decent i guess but i would never do it myself. for that price you can build a lot better. if you want a turn key install then its good enough.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 15, 2011
#9
  • Jun 15, 2011
  • #9
I vote 306 with nice heads.
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 16, 2011
#10
  • Jun 16, 2011
  • #10
CazSN95 said:
Highly doubt it. Never been a member here before and this is my first mustang.
Click to expand...

OK the description sounded jsut like a buddy of mine that is just starting to mod. Weird.

Here is the best advice you will ever get when it comes to your car. Decide how much power to want first and then start planning around it. Not having a plan at the beginning makes the overall cost get out of control and in the end you still may not end up with either a mechanically sound car or exaclty what you want. I see you never said how much power you are looking for.

Without knowing your future goals, I'll take a stab and say that a good route might be to find a lower mileage shortblock that is ready to go. I got one for $250 out of a fox. Then get some OK heads, cam intake. Whatever you can get for a good price. Then buy a used blower in the next stage. Don't forget driveline stuff that needs to be done in there too.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Jun 16, 2011
#11
  • Jun 16, 2011
  • #11
blower or turbo.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Jun 17, 2011
#12
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #12
rio95 said:
OK the description sounded jsut like a buddy of mine that is just starting to mod. Weird.

Here is the best advice you will ever get when it comes to your car. Decide how much power to want first and then start planning around it. Not having a plan at the beginning makes the overall cost get out of control and in the end you still may not end up with either a mechanically sound car or exaclty what you want. I see you never said how much power you are looking for.

Without knowing your future goals, I'll take a stab and say that a good route might be to find a lower mileage shortblock that is ready to go. I got one for $250 out of a fox. Then get some OK heads, cam intake. Whatever you can get for a good price. Then buy a used blower in the next stage. Don't forget driveline stuff that needs to be done in there too.
Click to expand...

What he said.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 17, 2011
#13
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #13
A rule of thumb when talking a foundation of NA 302 OEM
or
Same applies to an over bore 302 to 306

You can get about 1 SAE RWHP per Cubic Inch with aftermarket
parts and if tuned ... it will have stock like driveability

We are talking about all necessary supporting parts like meter,
injs, yadda - yadda - yadda

I would look into what to expect with a blown combo

This method really gives a good bang for the buck spent

You can go with cheap OEM parts with a blower and make more
power than going NA with aftermarket parts

B U T ..................

A blower ain't for everybody

Again ... you wanna get the straight facts about a blown combo :Word:

Grady
 
C

CazSN95

New Member
Jun 8, 2011
7
0
1
Jun 17, 2011
#14
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #14
rio95 said:
OK the description sounded jsut like a buddy of mine that is just starting to mod. Weird.

Here is the best advice you will ever get when it comes to your car. Decide how much power to want first and then start planning around it. Not having a plan at the beginning makes the overall cost get out of control and in the end you still may not end up with either a mechanically sound car or exaclty what you want. I see you never said how much power you are looking for.

Without knowing your future goals, I'll take a stab and say that a good route might be to find a lower mileage shortblock that is ready to go. I got one for $250 out of a fox. Then get some OK heads, cam intake. Whatever you can get for a good price. Then buy a used blower in the next stage. Don't forget driveline stuff that needs to be done in there too.
Click to expand...

I'm looking for around 400-450 horsepower, thats my ultimate goal. And I am definitely planning before I do anything, I planned on beginning the build end of July. But, I've since begun to think that It might be best to get a lower mileage motor and build it as I get the money, so I am able to buy the best parts and not end up with something cheap because I have to get the motor running and then end up blowing something.

This way, I can take my time and end up with as a good a motor as I want. I found a 5.0 out of a 98 explorer with 91k on it, their asking $750. Havent looked at it yet. (He said it was a good motor, but I certainly don't trust him on his word).
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 17, 2011
#15
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #15
i doubt you'll be able to build 400hp with a budget of 3k. if your motor was good right now then okay.

Turbo is going to be the better option. more cost than a blower but will get you closer to your goal in the end with less money. stock 5.0 motor with a bunch of boost will get you there for a while. probably not for too long but still get you there for a bit.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Jun 17, 2011
#16
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #16
I"m assuming you're already considering all the other parts that are necessary to run 400-450 hp, such as transmission, brakes, some suspension work, etc.

I think your idea of picking up a stock exploder motor and building slowly, while still driving what you have is a good approach. Sort out your whole plan for the car, maybe you want to spend some of that 3k on helping get power to the ground, etc.
 
C

CazSN95

New Member
Jun 8, 2011
7
0
1
Jun 17, 2011
#17
  • Jun 17, 2011
  • #17
Budget isn't necessarily 3k, that was if I decided to redo my current motor and had to get it up and running fast. I'm strongly leaning towards rebuilding an explorer motor and doing it the right way; it'll be a slow build definitely, worth it in the end I think.

And yes husky, I'll be doing that stuff before the motor ever goes in. Last thing I want is to change motors and see $1500 worth of parts that need to be replaced.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Jun 18, 2011
#18
  • Jun 18, 2011
  • #18
If you are going slow and building the motor out of the car and your budget is flexible, you may also want to consider a shortblock from chp, dss, or a similar company and then build off of that. That will gaurantee a solid foundation for your build.
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Jun 22, 2011
#19
  • Jun 22, 2011
  • #19
Personally, I say buy either the explorer motor or a short block. Like you mentioned the guy selling the explorer motor, you would have to take his word on it's a good engine . Shop around I'm sure there is junkyard in your state somewhere that guarantees their engine and has compression tests/ maybe a warranty.

Though buying a short block from late model restoration is a great foundation for the money. The economy short block for around 669.99 is fine for N/A and low boost applications (good tune), but I would up for the forged pistons if you wanted to run over 10psi. 1979-95 Mustang 5.0L 302 Economy Short Block, Accepts Roller Cam at LRS - Same Day Shipping!

I won't get into the top end debate of head/cam combos . Just ask a lot of questions and the guys on here are very helpful. Good luck!

Side note: which coast are you on?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Dilemma! 1988 LX 5.0
  • TTSaleen
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
331
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
638
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
763
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?