• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Sometimes I want an S197

  • Thread starter Thread starter scupking
  • Start date Start date Mar 31, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Mar 31, 2008
#21
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #21
I've been looking at a few 05s lately as i'd love to get a newer car.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Mar 31, 2008
#22
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #22
d98gt said:
I've been looking at a few 05s lately as i'd love to get a newer car.
Click to expand...

and get rid of the npi...???
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Mar 31, 2008
#23
  • Mar 31, 2008
  • #23
Never. This car is worth more to me than the small amount they'd give me on a trade in

The S197s look good with the hoodscoop and such and I actually love the interior and seats.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 1, 2008
#24
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #24
My Favorite interior is the 01 bullitt and 03-04 mach 1. Second would be the stock 01-04. The only issue is the head restraints on our seats. How are they supposed to stop you from getting neck injuries if you get into a crash?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Apr 1, 2008
#25
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #25
scupking said:
My Favorite interior is the 01 bullitt and 03-04 mach 1. Second would be the stock 01-04. The only issue is the head restraints on our seats. How are they supposed to stop you from getting neck injuries if you get into a crash?
Click to expand...

part of why i got my volvo. has the safest seats on the road, plus they hug better than any mustang seat except the 00R. they have WHIPs protection, i freak out whenever im in a car without them.
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Apr 1, 2008
#26
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #26
I love the look of the 05 and up GT's. I've also toyed around with getting one. The used ones are reasonably priced. They are nice cars and they do perform well. A few of the guys in the local KC Stang club have them. I also looked at few Mach 1's. I like my car to much to get rid of it right now. It may not be as fast as a Mach or new Stang but it ALWAYS put a smile on my face when I drive it. I'm working to "build" the car to what I want. Pearl02
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Apr 1, 2008
#27
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #27
thats a hell of a time for that car.

How do you think I feel over here?

I might have trouble running a 12.5 with the blower on haha
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Apr 1, 2008
#28
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #28
scupking said:
My Favorite interior is the 01 bullitt and 03-04 mach 1. Second would be the stock 01-04. The only issue is the head restraints on our seats. How are they supposed to stop you from getting neck injuries if you get into a crash?
Click to expand...

My head restraint is tilted forward, a nice improvement that my 93 could use. I see no future neck problems with the head piece tilted forward.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Apr 1, 2008
#29
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #29
I want one, well when they come out with something other then a 4.6 for the average Joe, if there ever is say a 5.0L 350+ to 400 HP GT with some coke-bottle hips, I'll be all over that, well esp cause my wife wants a Stang too. So I'm guessin maybe 2010 if government doesn't spoil all the fun for us by then.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Apr 1, 2008
#30
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #30
I don't car (personally) that they are faster. Thats a good job on ford. I understand that there is always gonna be someone better or faster out there. I just stay focused on making my car last as long as possible and building it to be my ultimate daily driven street/strip car. I plan on keeping this thing until the day i die. It was my first one and its the only care i have ever wanted. Of course i want other cars like the terminator, a 64 1/4 would be nice but im just happy owning a piece of americana and rocking it out. Plus after my final rebuild i plan on running a completely built 4.6 no stroke, no bore, just forged, with some patriot stage2 maybe 3 heads with some nice turbo cams and a twin turbo setup. Now obviously thats down the way a bit. Anyways thats how i get over them being faster. Keep your head up you cars not a pile or anything, ya know.
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Apr 1, 2008
#31
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #31
Ya guys i feel your pain, I had a great 03 with 75 shot of Nitrous, stage 2 heads and mild cams, full pipes (thanks chris) and way too many suspension mods to list and I barley ran 13.0 with stickies... Now i have the 08 and im running 12.9 as my personal best with small mods.. Its just sad... but the price wasnt ! ;(
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 1, 2008
#32
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #32
I have to keep telling myself that most of the classic muscle cars could only make it into the mid to low 14s.
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Apr 1, 2008
#33
  • Apr 1, 2008
  • #33
I drove an 06 gt with a 5 sp i will say it hands down is a more refined, smoother running/riding car. Made my car feel like a damn school bus in terms of ride quality, when i got back into it, however, it didn't seem like it had the same pull as my car which may be contributed to the car riding smoother, who knows but nice cars none the less
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Apr 2, 2008
#34
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #34
old_blue said:
as stated above why pay more for car with less horse power. I would take a mach one over a 05+. mach would react just as well to the same bolt ons and it is lighter.

more refined- how is this. The 09's maybe more refined but the 05+ still have their quirks. no different than when the sn95's first came out. and it isnt a true coil over system. sorry ill take a new edge any day. to each his own i guess.
Click to expand...

You need to do some research...

The 03 - 04 Mach 1 is heavier than the 05+ GT's are, granted not by much but they are. The 03 - 04 4.6 N/A 4V that is in the Mach 1 does not respond as well to mods as the 05+ 4.6 3V. The Mach 1 requires a minimum of 91 Octane fuel, the S197 requires a minimum of 87 Octane. You can see a pretty good power gain just by tuning the 3V to use 91 Octane, Ford didn't leave much to gain with a tune for the Mach 1's.

With a good driver, that time is pretty close to being bang on for the mods on that car.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Apr 2, 2008
#35
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #35
If we do the Mach 1 vs 3V **** again i think i'm leaving this site
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 2, 2008
#36
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #36
haha, but I missed that dicussion.

I do think the 3 valve engine makes the point, 'why would you want a 4th valve?'. I never thought the NA 4 valve lived up to it's potential, but I could never figure out the problem.

Bottom line, buy the chassis/body you want because the engines are basically dead even.

CobraRed_96_GT said:
If we do the Mach 1 vs 3V **** again i think i'm leaving this site
Click to expand...
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Apr 2, 2008
#37
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #37
bhuff30 said:
haha, but I missed that dicussion.

I do think the 3 valve engine makes the point, 'why would you want a 4th valve?'. I never thought the NA 4 valve lived up to it's potential, but I could never figure out the problem.

Bottom line, buy the chassis/body you want because the engines are basically dead even.
Click to expand...
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=739100&highlight=Mach+1
 
S

Silver2003Cobra

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
21
0
0
Apr 3, 2008
#38
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #38
bhuff30 said:
Threaded or not, it is a huge advantage to have the springs integrated with the struts as opposed to inboard springs as the 79-04 mustangs.
Click to expand...

not always.. look what Chevrolet has done with the leaf springs on the Corvette..

and that's definitely not as "advanced" as a coil spring..
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 4, 2008
#39
  • Apr 4, 2008
  • #39
The leaf spring in the corvette is COMPLETELY different. The springs are made from a composite and setup transversly. While it is a leaf, it in no way resembles the traditional leaf springs you'd see on a pickup or older muscle car. It IS much more advanced and as a lot of engineering in it.

None the less, I have to give regularly remind the guy with a new Z06 at work that it has push rods and leaf springs.

Silver2003Cobra said:
not always.. look what Chevrolet has done with the leaf springs on the Corvette..

and that's definitely not as "advanced" as a coil spring..
Click to expand...
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 4, 2008
#40
  • Apr 4, 2008
  • #40
TGJ said:
You need to do some research...

The 03 - 04 Mach 1 is heavier than the 05+ GT's are, granted not by much but they are. The 03 - 04 4.6 N/A 4V that is in the Mach 1 does not respond as well to mods as the 05+ 4.6 3V. The Mach 1 requires a minimum of 91 Octane fuel, the S197 requires a minimum of 87 Octane. You can see a pretty good power gain just by tuning the 3V to use 91 Octane, Ford didn't leave much to gain with a tune for the Mach 1's.

With a good driver, that time is pretty close to being bang on for the mods on that car.
Click to expand...

Yeah I remember seeing that the machs where like 30lbs or something heavier then the S197s. All the machs around hear are going for 18-22k, same as the used 05+. I would take ether car but would probably go with the S197. The thing is are generation engines sound so much better then the s197s.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Is it normal for all of this to go wrong or did I get played when I bought this ONLY A MONTH AGO.
  • ponygal02
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
270
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 14, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
346
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
907
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
505
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
P
Fox Opinions Wanted- at a crossroad with my '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
pindude80
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?