Here are a couple of observations that are general in nature but I have seen them over and over through the years on these Stang sites.
Lots of peeps go with C&L
Why
Cause they are less than PMAS (ProM)
I certainly do understand about saving $$$
If you investigate before you buy an aftermarket maf
You'll have no prob discovering this critical fact
An aftermarket maf works differently with our cars compared to the fox cars due to how the pcm processes the output from the maf.
Our cars pcm is based upon load factors which the maf determines
Fox cars don't use that method
They use rpm
When they go to an aftermarket maf
They usually don't have as many issues as we can
Now at this point in our discussion ..................
Lets talk about the decision of tune ... or ... no tune
If you tune with a method that can deal with the maf transfer curve
You can make any maf work, most of the time. As Greg pointed out above, some are more easier than others to dial in such as ProM or different oem maf that can deal with more airflow.
If you try to get by without a tune
You kinda take your chances
because
no two combos are exactly the same
The same aftermarket maf on two similar combos can cause different issues.
Here is where the no tune choice is at a disadvantage simply due to having less options to deal with drivability issues such as this one we have talked about here.
The above reasons and more are why you see peeps advise those who have a mild combo to keep the stock maf until airflow/fuel needs are more than the oem maf can deal with.
Summing up here
Moving to an aftermarket maf caled for 19's is very close to a total waste of money, time, and effort. If a gain is found, its gonna be very small, most of the time.
You will need more fuel on a growing combo way before you need a larger maf due to that growing combo pegging the oem stocker maf.
Grady