• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Spindles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black Sun 5.0
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2009

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
Feb 6, 2009
#1
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #1
I ordered and installed Baer's front and rear disk brake upgrade for my '90 which came with Fox front spindles which are modified for 5-lug. As a result, we needed to use spacers on the fronts so that my Bullet wheels would fit. Since I'm not appy with this spacer situation, I want to upgrade to 94/95 spindles. To complete this upgrade, what other accessories or parts will I need? Thanks.
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
Feb 6, 2009
#2
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #2
No takers? I figured this wan an easy one, 5-lug Fox spindles to 5-lug 94/spindles and associated parts.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,371
18,119
224
Massachusetts
Feb 6, 2009
#3
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #3
The problem is the rotors. They are the 13" kit correct?

You'd need SN95 spindles and 13" Cobra rotors. The baer calipers are the same as the Cobra calipers so they should bolt right on assuming Baer didn't do something crazy and add a custom bracket.

Then sell the Fox-based spindles off and recoop some of your money
 
D

DonMaximo

Member
Sep 25, 2003
217
5
19
Lewisville, Texas
Mar 7, 2009
#4
  • Mar 7, 2009
  • #4
I have a 1992 with 94 spindles. I am however, using Stainless Steel brake system and needed a spacer for my Bullet wheels to clear the larger calipers.

The problem I now have is that the wheel is pushed out beyond the fender. Rolling the inside lip will not solve the problem. I bought used fenders to modify and see if I can't expand them, but the more time I test... and consider this option... the less reasonable it seems to be a solution.

I'm next going to see if the 95/96 spindles have a slightly different profile that will allow the wheel to fall under/within the fender. For some reason, I seem to recall someone saying that are more shallow than the 94's. Not Certain though.

I will be keeping an eye on your thread.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Mar 7, 2009
#5
  • Mar 7, 2009
  • #5
The 96+ spindles will exacerbate the problem, since they have a wider track width than the 94-95 spindles.
 

Nova

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
128
0
0
Mar 8, 2009
#6
  • Mar 8, 2009
  • #6
here are the ford instructions for the m-1300-k kit

http://www.fordracingparts.com/download/instructionsheets/FordInstShtM-2300-K.pdf

heres another write up:
79-93 5 Lug Ford Fox Body Mustang Conversions
 
D

DonMaximo

Member
Sep 25, 2003
217
5
19
Lewisville, Texas
Mar 11, 2009
#7
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #7
StangGT1995 said:
The 96+ spindles will exacerbate the problem, since they have a wider track width than the 94-95 spindles.
Click to expand...


Yup !! I figured that out about 1-2 hours after my post.

So I spent the day on Saturday pounding metal with hammers and dollys to push out a flare and it came out tremendously well...will require very thin film of filler at best.

Thanks for the follow up
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 11, 2009
#8
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #8
If your are running 17X8 Bullit wheels up front you can run 94-95 spindles or 96-04 spindles. The 96-04 spindles push the wheels out 13mm over stock fox. The 94-95 spindles push the wheels out 5mm over stock fox. 96-04 increase the track width 8mm over 94-95 spindles.

Either way, the front wheels will not stick out. But if you go 17X9 up front with 96-04 spindles, they will stick out.

You also need 94-04 ball joints in the lower control arms, of just buy spacers and place them on top of the ball joint after you set the spindle on it. These spacers place the crown nut upward so it is aligned with the cotter pin hole.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,361
211
114
Ohio
Mar 12, 2009
#9
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #9
StangGT1995 said:
The 96+ spindles will exacerbate the problem, since they have a wider track width than the 94-95 spindles.
Click to expand...

Another problem with 96-04 Spindles used with the Stock K Member is increased Bumpsteer!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Front ATS brakes with Taurus rear brakes. Full parts needed?
  • Wagonized
  • Sep 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
287
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2026
General karthief
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
85
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2026
jaygee15
J
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
318
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
S
Fox Another try for the European guy to get his first Fox
  • Schargedfox
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
386
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 4, 2026
DadLife0724
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?