• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Spindles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uhoh5.0
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 12, 2010
#1
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #1
I am going to start on a disc brake conversion for my 66' 6 cylinder car, and I want to upgrade to V8 spindles. My question is on the early cars (pre 67) what other vehicles had the same spindles? Can I use V8 Falcon or Fairlane spindles? Are they the same as the mustang spindles of 65 to 66? Seems like the prices on mustang spindles are pretty high, whereas falcon and fairlane spindles are much more reasonable. I want to stay away from the Granada spindles because I want to run 14" wheels.
 
C

chockostang

New Member
Jun 16, 2009
106
0
0
Jun 12, 2010
#2
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #2
uhoh5.0 said:
I am going to start on a disc brake conversion for my 66' 6 cylinder car, and I want to upgrade to V8 spindles. My question is on the early cars (pre 67) what other vehicles had the same spindles? Can I use V8 Falcon or Fairlane spindles? Are they the same as the mustang spindles of 65 to 66? Seems like the prices on mustang spindles are pretty high, whereas falcon and fairlane spindles are much more reasonable. I want to stay away from the Granada spindles because I want to run 14" wheels.
Click to expand...

Wise choice on the Granada!

Yes, the 64 65 Falcon V8 Spindles are the same as 64 65 66 Mustang. As a matter of fact, the spindles will be C5DA--The D is Falcon. Some might be C4ZA, but few.

Now the Fairlane??, Yes it can be used to place 4 Piston K/H Disc brakes on your Mustang, but the problem is in the steering arm length (1/2" Longer), and in the tie rod taper. Both being incorrect.

Kinda gets into the Granada thing about putting non fitting parts on, making them fit by doing Etc, Etc, Etc.

To do it right, put C5DA Spindle on be correct, not "Rig it up", to many out there now having problems with the homemade brakes.

Dan @ Chockostang
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 12, 2010
#3
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #3
That's good info, so basically if I go by casting numbers, for my 66' as long as I get either a C5DA or C4ZA that will be the correct V8 spindle for my conversion?
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 12, 2010
#4
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #4
I wonder what these are? THis is the casting number from a set I was looking at???

C3DA3108J.
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 12, 2010
#5
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #5
Does this look correct?
 

Attachments

  • spindle1.webp
    22.3 KB · Views: 3,687
C

chockostang

New Member
Jun 16, 2009
106
0
0
Jun 13, 2010
#6
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #6
uhoh5.0 said:
I wonder what these are? THis is the casting number from a set I was looking at???

C3DA3108J.
Click to expand...

That Drivers sides spindle C3DA 3108 is a 6 cylinder spindle. View the nut on the spindle, will be same size as trhe nut on your Mustang now.

The C5DA are larger, taking the A 2, and A 6 Bearings.

Dan @ Chockostang
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 13, 2010
#7
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #7
Well, that makes sense. I need to look at the diameter at the end of the shaft. Here is another pic, definately looks like this spindle has a larger nut on the end, so must be a v8 spindle. No casting number though. DO you have any suggestions on the best places to find V8 spindles? I don't think anyone recasts them?
 

Attachments

  • v8.webp
    14.6 KB · Views: 2,071

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 13, 2010
#8
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #8
The one in the picture above is C5DA-3107B, so it is a V8 spindle.
I know you can beadblast the majority of the spindle to clean it up before painting, but what about the actual polished area that the bearing goes on? Steel wool?
 
C

chockostang

New Member
Jun 16, 2009
106
0
0
Jun 14, 2010
#9
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #9
uhoh5.0 said:
Well, that makes sense. I need to look at the diameter at the end of the shaft. Here is another pic, definately looks like this spindle has a larger nut on the end, so must be a v8 spindle. No casting number though. DO you have any suggestions on the best places to find V8 spindles? I don't think anyone recasts them?
Click to expand...

That is a C5DA Spindle. Polish with steel wool, a wire bush, whatever, check for and imperfections on bearing surfaces, if any use emory cloth, polish out till bearing slides on freely.

We have a few of these available.

Dan @ Chockostang
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 14, 2010
#10
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #10
I bought that C5DA spindle pictured above off ebay yesterday. I think I ended up paying $36 bucks plus shipping. It ended up being less than $50 bucks and it looks to be in pretty good shape. I need a driver's side spindle to match now. If you happen to have one, let me know what you would take for it. You can PM me if you would like.
THanks,
Sean
 
O

other_shoe

Member
May 4, 2007
313
3
19
Jun 14, 2010
#11
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #11
Slight threadjack alert

What are the issues with the Granada spindles other than the hub not fitting a 14 inch wheel?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2010
#12
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #12
other_shoe said:
What are the issues with the Granada spindles other than the hub not fitting a 14 inch wheel?
Click to expand...

The hubs on Granada rotors are huge, and stock 60's Ford 14" wheels won't fit on them. So you either need to have the hubs machined, or buy a set of wheels.

Plus there are other considerations, such as outer tie rod ends. They have big pins, bigger than 70-73 Mustangs, so you have to get Granada outer tie rod ends. On 64-66 PS cars, the LH tie rod ends need to be offset, and a special outer "Granada" end is available, but it's not exactly $9.95 at Pep Boys. Plus the steering arm geometry is wrong for a 64-66, not a fatal problem, but not as good as stock, either.

Suddenly that cheap Granada conversion isn't so cheap. Figure you can get stock 64-73 disc conversions with entirely new parts for under $600, and the Granada conversion starts to look kinda dumb.
 
O

other_shoe

Member
May 4, 2007
313
3
19
Jun 14, 2010
#13
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #13
Thanks for the reply, 2+2 Gt.

OK, to confirm: Is it correct to say that other than the problems with wheel fitment, most of the problems involve the 64-66 cars?

As I read your response, the chief problem for a 67 is that you have to use Granada tie rod ends and you must either run non-stock wheels or have the snout of the hub turned down. Is that correct?

The reason I'm asking is that I already have the Granada conversion (and have since before there was anything like this forum), and I'm curious about the consequences.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2010
#14
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #14
other_shoe said:
Thanks for the reply, 2+2 Gt.

OK, to confirm: Is it correct to say that other than the problems with wheel fitment, most of the problems involve the 64-66 cars?

As I read your response, the chief problem for a 67 is that you have to use Granada tie rod ends and you must either run non-stock wheels or have the snout of the hub turned down. Is that correct?

The reason I'm asking is that I already have the Granada conversion (and have since before there was anything like this forum), and I'm curious about the consequences.
Click to expand...

The Granada is much closer to right on the 67-73. You are already past the wheel problem, obviously. Granada outer tie rod ends will work perfectly on a 67-73 Mustang.
 

degins

Member
Sep 18, 2004
361
0
17
Texas
Jun 14, 2010
#15
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #15
2+2GT said:
The hubs on Granada rotors are huge, and stock 60's Ford 14" wheels won't fit on them. So you either need to have the hubs machined, or buy a set of wheels.

Plus there are other considerations, such as outer tie rod ends. They have big pins, bigger than 70-73 Mustangs, so you have to get Granada outer tie rod ends. On 64-66 PS cars, the LH tie rod ends need to be offset, and a special outer "Granada" end is available, but it's not exactly $9.95 at Pep Boys. Plus the steering arm geometry is wrong for a 64-66, not a fatal problem, but not as good as stock, either.

Suddenly that cheap Granada conversion isn't so cheap. Figure you can get stock 64-73 disc conversions with entirely new parts for under $600, and the Granada conversion starts to look kinda dumb.
Click to expand...

The situation with manual steer pre 1966 6 cylinder Falcons and 6 cylinder 65-66 Mustang is not that simple. You can not simply slap 65-66 V8 spindles on (even if you can find them) and then upgrade the brakes. The steering geometry of the 6 cylinder linkage is not correct for V8 spindles. The steering gear, including center link, pitman arm, idler arm and bracket, inner and outer tie rod arms, and tie rod adjuster sleeves will need to be upgraded to 65-66 V8 type (65 Falcon type with 63-65 Falcon). This will cost about $300.

The point about wheel fit does not make sense either. Upgrading a 6 cylinder to Ford type 5 lug disc brakes requires substituting in fitting aftermarket wheels regardless of if the brakes are stock 65-66 or Granada type. So the large hubs on the Granada rotor is not an issue. It is also a well know fact that Granada spindles are available with 65-66 V8 correct steering geometry. In fact, a complete kit, with all new parts, is available for $525 ($595 for 4 lug version), including correct V8 spindles and outer tie rods. The $600 stock conversion you mention above does not include the cost of spindles.

The Granada kit is by far the most economical choice for a Ford type disc brake conversion on a 65-73 Mustang that is missing its spindles, or a 65-66 6 cylinder Mustang.
 

uhoh5.0

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
354
0
17
Montgomery, AL
Jun 14, 2010
#16
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #16
For me, I plan on doing a complete V8 conversion to my 66. In terms of the steering/brake setup that would include larger spindles, center link, pitman arm, idler arm, idler arm bracket, inner and outer tie rods and adjusting sleeves. The best I have been able to price all this stuff excluding the spindles, as mentioned above is right around $300 bucks. To me though, on a 6 cylinder car you need to do this regardless of which braking system you go with so that you have the heavier duty components to account for the extra weight on the front end and to have the ability to stop the larger motor faster. Also, I personally like the look of the smaller wheels on the earlier cars. I am going to stay with a 14" wheel for now, and I don't want to have any fitment issues with the granada kit. I also think that the issues with the original granada conversion kits have since been corrected with the "recasted" granada spindles that are sold in today's kits. I think it comes down to personal preference really, but I also think that the granada calipers are a single piston caliper v/s a 4 piston caliper that is available in many of the other kits.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2010
#17
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #17
The situation with manual steer pre 1966 6 cylinder Falcons and 6 cylinder 65-66 Mustang is not that simple. You can not simply slap 65-66 V8 spindles on (even if you can find them) and then upgrade the brakes. The steering geometry of the 6 cylinder linkage is not correct for V8 spindles. The steering gear, including center link, pitman arm, idler arm and bracket, inner and outer tie rod arms, and tie rod adjuster sleeves will need to be upgraded to 65-66 V8 type (65 Falcon type with 63-65 Falcon). This will cost about $300.
Exactly right. I was not aware, however, that we were discussing the steering linkage. I was addressing the spindles.

The point about wheel fit does not make sense either. Upgrading a 6 cylinder to Ford type 5 lug disc brakes requires substituting in fitting aftermarket wheels regardless of if the brakes are stock 65-66 or Granada type. So the large hubs on the Granada rotor is not an issue.
Not necessarily. Plain steel or styled steel wheels might be desired. Often as not, people are changing a V8 car from drum to disc, and their stock or repro wheels would not fit the Granada hubs.

It is also a well know fact that Granada spindles are available with 65-66 V8 correct steering geometry.
Not so well known, actually. Of course, you'd have a different perspective, being a provider. Typically, the "Granada conversion" involves greasy parts fron U-Pick-It. These would NOT be what you are referring to.

In fact, a complete kit, with all new parts, is available for $525 ($595 for 4 lug version), including correct V8 spindles and outer tie rods. The $600 stock conversion you mention above does not include the cost of spindles.
Actually, I was referring to your 65-66 disc conversion, based in existing V8 spindles.

The Granada kit is by far the most economical choice for a Ford type disc brake conversion on a 65-73 Mustang that is missing its spindles, or a 65-66 6 cylinder Mustang.
If we are discussing both disc and V8 conversion simultaneously, yes. The days of cheap 64-66 used V8 spindles are just about over. Unless you plan to start making them. IIRC, Cobra Automotive sells drum-style spindles, but frankly I don't know if they are new parts or reconditioned originals.
 

chris66dad

Member
Dec 19, 2008
167
0
17
Benicia California
Jun 14, 2010
#18
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #18
I have the Granada kit from CSRP and it stops very well. It is powerful enough to stop consistently with no fade. I do not see how it would make much difference except if you are auto crossing or pushing it really hard for long periods and getting to the point of having your disks fade. Mine is a daily driver though....
Just wanted to add my 2 cents that the kit is a great value and offers very good performance.
I also have no bumpsteer with the re engineered CSRP spindles
 
G

grainboy

Member
Feb 2, 2006
140
0
17
Goodyear, AZ
Jun 17, 2010
#19
  • Jun 17, 2010
  • #19
Chris, What specs did you use for an alignment? 0, 0, 1/8 " in?
That is what i asked for, but not what I got. Steering feels loose on freeway, and has a tad of bumpsteer. I have 0 camber and 2.5 deg negative caster.

BTW, I have granada spindles with Mustang Steve bushings with 6 cyl everything else.
 

chris66dad

Member
Dec 19, 2008
167
0
17
Benicia California
Jun 17, 2010
#20
  • Jun 17, 2010
  • #20
-.25 camber
+3.0 caster
1/16 tow in

Very stable and responsive
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
163
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?