North East SSoM Members!!!

#6,961
Badstang00 said:
Could be off, who knows? It is a Dynojet though.
Click to expand...

All, I'am trying to say is with all these different dyno's out there, which one can you trust. I know that F1 is about 10% off on thier TQ #'s , but thier HP is right on. They have notified Land and Sea about the problem. Thier pretty pissed about it. They are trying to correct the problem.

There was a STI in there that did like 475HP and over 500TQ. Friggen sick. I still love the mustang, no matter what. I just can't wait to see these cars at 80k-100k on them. I'll bet they won't run like they do now. Hell I've got over 100k on mine... :D
 
#6,962
whitehorseupnorth said:
All, I'am trying to say is with all these different dyno's out there, which one can you trust. I know that F1 is about 10% off on thier TQ #'s , but thier HP is right on. They have notified Land and Sea about the problem. Thier pretty pissed about it. They are trying to correct the problem.
Click to expand...

I dont think Ive had enough coffee yet because I dont understand this. If all dynos can be off by at least 10% and wondering which dyno to trust that is accurate, what are you comparing their dyno to to say that their HP is right on but their TQ is 10% off :shrug:

Are you saying Land and Sea are more accurate than Dynojets or Mustang dynos? If so what are you basing that on? Just curious..this isnt to start an argument
 
#6,963
FEARNO1 said:
I dont think Ive had enough coffee yet because I dont understand this. If all dynos can be off by at least 10% and wondering which dyno to trust that is accurate, what are you comparing their dyno to to say that their HP is right on but their TQ is 10% off :shrug:

Are you saying Land and Sea are more accurate than Dynojets or Mustang dynos? If so what are you basing that on? Just curious..this isnt to start an argument
Click to expand...

Ok, for starters, I never said anything about which dyno is more accurate. I'am basing it off my numbers and all the cars they have dynoed. So, inreality it's more that 3 dynos involved to verify the discrepancy. You really haven't had your coffee yet..
 
#6,969
Dyno

Its not like there is a state agency(weights and measures) that goes around and tests the accuracy of these places.
There can be major discrepencies between these places.

HA HA Dan is hungover!!! He thought he saw a bunch of Mustangs but they were probably Civics.
 
#6,971
gaslight said:
Its not like there is a state agency(weights and measures) that goes around and tests the accuracy of these places.
There can be major discrepencies between these places.

HA HA Dan is hungover!!! He thought he saw a bunch of Mustangs but they were probably Civics.
Click to expand...
no way. I saw them way before the drinking comensed.
 
#6,974
HAHA :lol: Dan is a drunk bastard, or at least was :rolleyes:


Brian its good to see that you got your car up and running must be nice after all winter.

2 more days and Im on vacation, or maybe just 1 if I decide to be sick tomorrow.
 
#6,976
whitehorseupnorth said:
There was a STI in there that did like 475HP and over 500TQ. Friggen sick. I still love the mustang, no matter what. I just can't wait to see these cars at 80k-100k on them. I'll bet they won't run like they do now. Hell I've got over 100k on mine... :D
Click to expand...


Thats true, the test of time is a huge factor. Needless to say that even though many of us have not been under boost for that long I still belive our motors would hold up alot longer to boost compared to some of the subie motors w/ the power there putting out ( comparing stock VS Stock block )
 
#6,977
Striped5.0 said:
Thats true, the test of time is a huge factor. Needless to say that even though many of us have not been under boost for that long I still belive our motors would hold up alot longer to boost compared to some of the subie motors w/ the power there putting out ( comparing stock VS Stock block )
Click to expand...

well the big difference is compression. our motors will only last with low boost unless (as you all know) we lower compression, or if you own a 03-04 cobra then your loving life!! but i have seen talons with 175k running 25lbs of boost and loving it. japs use forged parts i wish Ford did on my car!
 
#6,978
gaslight said:
Its not like there is a state agency(weights and measures) that goes around and tests the accuracy of these places.
There can be major discrepencies between these places.
.
Click to expand...
Supposedly, Mustang dyno's show about 5% less than a dynojet would. So I'd be @ 458rwhp on a dyno-jet. I don't believe my #'s are that high, doesn't say SAE corrected on my sheet. Dyno's are just a tool, so unless you're using the same dyno on the same conditions, you really can't compare. I'm more concerned about the AFR than the hp/tq#'s, although I may have to get on a dyno-jet just to see.
 
#6,979
cold96snake said:
Supposedly, Mustang dyno's show about 5% less than a dynojet would. So I'd be @ 458rwhp on a dyno-jet. I don't believe my #'s are that high, doesn't say SAE corrected on my sheet. Dyno's are just a tool, so unless you're using the same dyno on the same conditions, you really can't compare. I'm more concerned about the AFR than the hp/tq#'s, although I may have to get on a dyno-jet just to see.[/QUOTE

oh you are so rite. why else would anyone want to put a car on a dyno other than to get the actual tuning correct(AF/ EGT) :cheers:
Click to expand...
 
#6,980
rustang04 said:
well the big difference is compression. our motors will only last with low boost unless (as you all know) we lower compression, or if you own a 03-04 cobra then your loving life!! but i have seen talons with 175k running 25lbs of boost and loving it. japs use forged parts i wish Ford did on my car!
Click to expand...
That pisses me off to no end. I have a block manufactured in italy by the same company that makes ferrari blocks, holds up to 1000hp, and Ford puts cheap ass pistons and even cheaper rods in it. :fuss:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
Replies
8
Views
373
The Welcome Wagon
Noobz347
Noobz347
J
Exhaust manifold to Y-pipe nut & stud dimensions?
Replies
2
Views
142
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
joeybuddy96
J
Zero_chance
WTB 89 Hatchback interior trim - any color
Replies
2
Views
141
Want to Buy
Noobz347
Noobz347
P
rear Impact absorbers.
Replies
2
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Praetorious
P
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
Replies
3
Views
448
Other Auto Tech
Noobz347
Noobz347
Top Bottom
Back
Forums
Menu