• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

stangnet sucks

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhuff30
  • Start date Start date Nov 4, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Nov 9, 2004
#81
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #81
mr_woodster said:
Basicly, a stock 2.3T with little to no "bolt ons", just the diy stuff can hit 250-300rwhp. With the same milage.

Everything is mod-able, im looking at the plus side of a 2.3t

Simple to work on(i can pull the head in 30 mins or less!)
Forged internals(stock)
Very strong block(stock)
300hp capable on stock computer,injectors,vam,engine managment,intake manifold,head.

Not saying a 5.0 is hard to work on, but in reality IT IS twice as much work as my 2.3. I've love v8's, worked on a few of them (changing h/g is no fun thats for sure!). But my little 4 banger makes the power, gets the milage and is cheap to drive. I really dont see how that could work out any better for me?


PS:my dad can beat up your dad!
Click to expand...
yeah this is getting a little carried away.To each his own,I respect 4 cylinders(even though they need a power adder to hang with the big boys) me,I love the rumble of a V-8!! especially a ford !! A small block Ford has the best sounding exhaust note from the factory,IMO,,But variety is the spice of life.Peace
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Nov 9, 2004
#82
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #82
willys1 said:
yeah this is getting a little carried away.To each his own,I respect 4 cylinders(even though they need a power adder to hang with the big boys) me,I love the rumble of a V-8!! especially a ford !! A small block Ford has the best sounding exhaust note from the factory,IMO,,But variety is the spice of life.Peace
Click to expand...

thats ashame you had an intelligent thought out message going there for about a second.

I never said heads etc would NOT run 12's I'm saying if you think its that easy then get to it. Do everything you can with those simple mods and I'll race you with my "stock parts" 351w. Please do not preach to me about V8 stuff. I live in a 2.3 forum because it was a challenge to build a 4cyl. I had no idea where to buy aftermarket parts so I learned to deal with it. Now you should see MY V8 car"S". The 87 coupe should be really quick using the knowledge I gained from the 2.3s

"If you can make it go with 140, then you can make it go harder with 393"
Here's my parts list:
Everything stock or junk yard parts except for:
393 Crank--$450
302 pistons-$300
intake adaptors- $50 (homemade)
headers originally made for a 351c to a fox swap. $250
$200 will finish any other lose ends I may have.

I own more V8 cars than you will ever own. My sig. Won't let me add any more.

Finally about the power adder thing. The last car in my sig is probably going to be your worst nightmare if you think I need a power adder. Hell I don't even need a 2.3. 2.0 will do just fine.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Nov 9, 2004
#83
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #83
willys take a deep breathe before you post and do it calmly. We can keep this gong a while as long as everything stays pretty calm.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Nov 9, 2004
#84
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #84
I'm impressed that we havn't resorted to name calling yet. lol
1. The truth is that a stock 2.3 block will hold just as much power as a stock 5.0 block. Neither will hold up reliably at 500+hp. The 2.3 tends to break lose rods and the 5.0 tends to crack right down the middle.
2. The fact is that intial parts to build up a 2.3 are cheaper. We can put on a $5 boost valve, bump the boost up to 20psi and gain an instant 30-40hp, guarenteed at the wheels with no strings attached. That isn't a trick test like advertisers claim when they replace the stock airbox on a tricked out NA 5.0 making 400hp and they magically gain 20hp from a K&N over the stock airbox.
3. If you want to make more than 400hp without juice, you are better off getting a 5.0 and boosting it.
4. Nothing sounds as nice as a turbo spooling... except 2 turbos spooling .
If I had the money, I would love to build a twin turbo 302/306 with a pair of T3's hanging off the side. The power would be insane, and with a set of Al heads, it wouldn't weigh much more than a regular 5.0.
For me, I like the 2.3 because it is initially cheap to make power, has a awsome sleeper aspect, and it is lighter than the 5.0 which allows me to kick some ass while autocrossing.
 

T3AL

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
215
0
0
Nov 9, 2004
#85
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #85
reasions to own a 2.3

light motor
faster revs
makes power faster
less rotational mass
and can make just/ifnot more power and TQ than a v8


the only v8 I will ever own is a 289 cause there light, they rev faster and can make just/ifnot more power and TQ than your everyday 302/306 and so on and so on....

just cause the motor is bigger means jack IMHO
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Nov 9, 2004
#86
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #86
T3AL said:
reasions to own a 2.3

light motor
faster revs
makes power faster
less rotational mass
and can make just/ifnot more power and TQ than a v8


the only v8 I will ever own is a 289 cause there light, they rev faster and can make just/ifnot more power and TQ than your everyday 302/306 and so on and so on....

just cause the motor is bigger means jack IMHO
Click to expand...
People like you make just us look bad.
First of all, the 289 and the 302 are both small block fords. The biggest difference is a slight change of stroke. A 289 would only be slightly lighter than the 302 becuase of accessories like the smog pump. Also, the rating methods for the current 302 are different from that of the 289. When the 289 was rated, it was gross, meaning no accessories. Now, they are rated with all accessories, which makes it look like they have less power.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Nov 9, 2004
#87
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #87
This thread is homo.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 9, 2004
#88
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #88
Crovax said:
This thread is homo.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the update
 

T3AL

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
215
0
0
Nov 9, 2004
#89
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #89
Hay it was just my oppinion no need to get all assjamed about it
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Nov 9, 2004
#90
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #90
P.S.--Man those rims and tires are UGLY
Click to expand...

**** YOU....and all of the unintelligent comments you have made in the past week. RIMS ARE FOR BICYCLES...WHEELS ARE FOR CARS.... I wont rag on anyones car, because thats not cool. However, if the only thing that you can find wrong with my car is the wheels then ...I dont see you posting pics of your 14 sec ride with drag radials on here. I'll say it one more time as well....Go back to somewhere where people like you!!

-Josh

P.S-Dont think your special becasue you've made 1500 posts. Only 1 out of every 10 posts you make, makes any sense, or even pertains to the subject of the thread... IE your comment about my wheels, how is that important? I would expect more out of a "super stallion"
 

Cougar

Founding Member
Sep 29, 2001
913
0
0
Manhattan Kansas, KSU
Nov 9, 2004
#91
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #91
T3AL said:
Hay it was just my oppinion no need to get all assjamed about it
Click to expand...
Actually you were sharing what you thought to be facts, which were definately not.
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Nov 10, 2004
#92
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #92
T3AL said:
Hay it was just my oppinion no need to get all assjamed about it
Click to expand...
Wow, you got Brian mad I dont think I ever seen that before.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Nov 10, 2004
#93
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #93
93 teal terror said:
You got me....you caught the tator.....now im going to search the classifieds for a 85 t bird that runs a 12.64...then I will be teh win
Click to expand...

Boy, you ARE an intelligent one...did I say EVERY BONE STOCK TC WILL RUN 12's? NO. I said Marty Buth's NHRA stock class TC with nearly all stock parts runs 12's...learn to read and quit putting words in my mouth...
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Nov 10, 2004
#94
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #94
Edit. Not going to get into a pissing contest about nothing. Yup your right I can't read.
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Nov 10, 2004
#95
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #95
.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Nov 10, 2004
#96
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #96
351wcoupe said:
thats ashame you had an intelligent thought out message going there for about a second.

I never said heads etc would NOT run 12's I'm saying if you think its that easy then get to it. Do everything you can with those simple mods and I'll race you with my "stock parts" 351w. Please do not preach to me about V8 stuff. I live in a 2.3 forum because it was a challenge to build a 4cyl. I had no idea where to buy aftermarket parts so I learned to deal with it. Now you should see MY V8 car"S". The 87 coupe should be really quick using the knowledge I gained from the 2.3s

"If you can make it go with 140, then you can make it go harder with 393"
Here's my parts list:
Everything stock or junk yard parts except for:
393 Crank--$450
302 pistons-$300
intake adaptors- $50 (homemade)
headers originally made for a 351c to a fox swap. $250
$200 will finish any other lose ends I may have.

I own more V8 cars than you will ever own. My sig. Won't let me add any more.

Finally about the power adder thing. The last car in my sig is probably going to be your worst nightmare if you think I need a power adder. Hell I don't even need a 2.3. 2.0 will do just fine.
Click to expand...
LOL,,this is rediculous,,,I must be hitting a nerve because of all these long threads,,OK,now your saying a stock 2.0 litre will beat my 5.0 huh,,yeah ok!! Sounds like your 351 kicks @ss must be a V-8 Hey Josh,dont take it so seriously,,youve got a hot vert. I just dont like the "WHEELS".No punn intended
 

T3AL

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
215
0
0
Nov 10, 2004
#97
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #97
meh it happens
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Nov 10, 2004
#98
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #98
willys1 said:
LOL,,this is rediculous,,,I must be hitting a nerve because of all these long threads,,OK,now your saying a stock 2.0 litre will beat my 5.0 huh,,yeah ok!! Sounds like your 351 kicks @ss must be a V-8
Click to expand...

Who said my 2.0 was stock? I just said it wasn't turbo and the car weighs about 1700 with me. How much power do you think It will take to outrun you? The 2.0 won't make much power but the car's light so it doesn't have to.

I love my 351 cars and trucks. But as of this weekend the 2.3 is faster...I almost cried because I never thought it would be possible. Now I'm on a mission to get the next windsor going cheap and still leave enough time to build/tune a 2.3 pinto for WFC8.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Nov 10, 2004
#99
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #99
I can make all of you gasp and study your feet just by glaring at you. To bad we're not all together in person or I'd do it.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Nov 10, 2004
#100
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #100
hey 140 you did that when you posted the pics of the "R"
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
321
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
876
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
  • Poll Poll
Fox Foxtoberfest 2025: Registration open!
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
116
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
TripleYellow
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?