• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

steath stock combo opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtlionsfan
  • Start date Start date Dec 31, 2007
D

dtlionsfan

Member
Nov 12, 2005
83
0
16
Dec 31, 2007
#1
  • Dec 31, 2007
  • #1
I bought an 89 5.0 5 speed hatch a few moths ago in pristine condition.Got it from the original owner,a lady and was garaged since new.I want to have a fun project and do hard to or can't detect mods to make a fun street car with excellent torque.I have a TMOSS lower,ported upper,65mm FRPP t-body and spacer,pulleys.I plan on 1.7 RR,pulling the heads and doing a port job,TFS spring kit and a 3 angle valve job.I had a hatch before with ported E7's[by me]explorer intake 1.7RR,stock cam,T5,4.10's and ran 13.3 on street tires.My questions are
1.what gears 3.55 or 3.73?
2.how much can I cut the heads for a little extra squeeze without intake sealing problems? .020?
3.stock MAF OK for my intentions?
Any input or opinions welcome,this should be fun.
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Dec 31, 2007
#2
  • Dec 31, 2007
  • #2
Send thumper a set of gt40p's cut them .030. Run 12s all day. Get a mass air meter from a t-bird in the junkyard. It's the same 70mm they used in the cobras.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Dec 31, 2007
#3
  • Dec 31, 2007
  • #3
Thumper and tmoss combos ROCK!!! Cool??
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jan 1, 2008
#4
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #4
I wouldn't bother with ford heads unless you were running a class . . .

get some windsor sr heads, all it takes is a die grinder and they look like a production head.



stock 92 shortblock
stock cam
1.7s
ported RPM-II
65mm throttle body
Roush 200 (windsor sr) heads ported by chris howe
1 5/8 shorties
2 1/2" flowmaster to 2 1/4" tailpipes
t5, 3.73s

sounded and idled like stock
 

Attachments

  • sc001a047cwx0.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 110
S

svtpower

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
257
0
0
Wisconsin
Jan 1, 2008
#5
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #5
gears

3.73s
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Jan 1, 2008
#6
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #6
Replace the 55mm Fox MAF with a 94/95 Stang GT 70MM MAF. It'll give you a _few_ (~3->7hp) more HP above ~3K for a *stock* engine. More of a HP gain for an engine with mods. Plus, I'll look close to stock.
 
D

dtlionsfan

Member
Nov 12, 2005
83
0
16
Jan 1, 2008
#7
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #7
what about the t-bird 70mm maf,it looks stock and will bolt to the stock bracket? I had a 700mm 94/94 maf on my last 2 cars,worked great after milling off flange but couldn't use bracket.
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 1, 2008
#8
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #8
t-bird and 93 cobra have the same 70mm mass air meter. Its a great stock upgrade.
 
D

dtlionsfan

Member
Nov 12, 2005
83
0
16
Jan 1, 2008
#9
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #9
what about the electronics? What number to look for?
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 1, 2008
#10
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #10
Use the sensor off the factory meter in your car.
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Jan 1, 2008
#11
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #11
ttop88 said:
t-bird and 93 cobra have the same 70mm mass air meter. Its a great stock upgrade.
Click to expand...
Some T-birds have the same 70mm MAF as the 93 Cobra. That MAF is not useful at all for a stock system!

ttop88 said:
Use the sensor off the factory meter in your car.
Click to expand...
Please. NEVER EVER swap electronics on MAFs - NEVER! C&L is a joke company and their products are a huge joke. Every MAF electronic assembly must be custom tuned to a specific and unique MAF body. It's a PURE CR*P SHOOT swapping electronics to same exact style and model MAFs.

Plus, it makes no sense at all to swap the electronics between 2 different model MAFs. The air flow characteristics are all different. And the percentage of the air flow through the sensors are all different.


If someone could design it so that the required accuracy could be obtained without custom tunning the electronics, then DO IT and make a zillion-trillion dollars!

FWIW: I'm now doing my third first in a particular industry design that allows for the electronics to be custom tuned (without the $$ way that it used to be done, or the $$$ Auto OEMs do it). Custom tuning electronics have been done for many years. Actually, since the industry started. It's now becoming more common in more industries. Still, there is a *long* way to go (good for me I guess ).

A simple cheap 10-bit ADC (analog to digital converter) gives 1024 values over the voltage range. That's a means an accuracy of better than 0.1% is needed in the analog and other electronics if you don't want to just measure real-life tolerances (and noise). In reality, over temperature and voltage, that's very hard to do. That's why for when accuracy is needed in a more than a few units and they don't want to spend the $$ doing custom tuning the "old ways", they hire consultants ($$$$$ - but cheaper when spread out over _many_ units) like me.

FWIW: I can get a self contained "system on a chip" that has a 14-bit ADC (~16K values over the voltage range), CPU that executes ~5 million instructions per second, EEPROM (Flash), RAM, timers, and a ton of other good things for less than $5 - yes less than five dollars! But, getting overall analog accuracy (over temp, voltage, many units, etc) better than 1% (without high component costs) is still not common.
http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=CY8C29466-24SXIT-ND
CY8C29466-24SXIT ; Program Memory Size 32K x 8 ; RAM Size 2K x 8 ;
Number of I /O 24 ; Speed 24MHz ; Controller Series CY8C29 PSOC™ ;
Data Converters A/D 4x14b; D/A 4x9b
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 1, 2008
#12
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #12
stang&2Birds said:
Some T-birds have the same 70mm MAF as the 93 Cobra. That MAF is not useful at all for a stock system!


Please. NEVER EVER swap electronics on MAFs - NEVER! C&L is a joke company and their products are a huge joke. Every MAF electronic assembly must be custom tuned to a specific and unique MAF body. It's a PURE CR*P SHOOT swapping electronics to same exact style and model MAFs.

For what it's worth, what I said to do WORKS! I have done it on many cars and I have seen it done by many people on this board without problams. C&L may be a industry joke but the product they sell shows power on the dyno. I am not debateing that spending $500 for a flip chip and dyno tune will net more power. What I suggested is to get what is basically a junkyard C&L for $20 and get the most out of his combo on the cheap and still be useing factory parts,which is what the OP said they wanted. "stealth"
As for the rest of what you posted im sure it is all true and makes since to 3 other people on this board. As of this moment I aint one of the 3
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
840
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
C
Opinions on my combo please
  • claypoolxx
  • Jan 21, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 29, 2022
7991LXnSHO
D
Stock block or?
  • Deleted member 215073
  • Nov 18, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 22, 2019
revhead347
9
Engine Current And Future Build Questions
  • 91gte303
  • Mar 3, 2015
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 5, 2015
A5literMan
Updated: 1st Run In 86 Gt, Low Mph (in My Opinion) Any Ideas?
  • v8stang289
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2015
A5literMan
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?