• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Steeda LCA's

  • Thread starter Thread starter fobra559
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 13, 2007
#1
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #1
I was deciding on Steeda LCA's and came across on a decision of steel or aluminum. What's the difference besides the material and the price? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 13, 2007
#2
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #2
Weight savings for the hardcore racer. I just don't like it that they paint their aluminum ones.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 13, 2007
#3
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #3
gsjohnson said:
Weight savings for the hardcore racer. I just don't like it that they paint their aluminum ones.
Click to expand...

Pretty much I'm not a hardcore racer, so the steel ones should be fine then and plus they are about a $120 cheaper than the aluminum ones. Any one have the Steeda steel one? If you do how are they?
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Dec 13, 2007
#4
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #4
fobra559 said:
I was deciding on Steeda LCA's and came across on a decision of steel or aluminum. What's the difference besides the material and the price? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...

Aluminum is lighter but more prone to breaking. I went to a shop to have them installed and the shop wouldn't install them. They showed me a set where the weld had broken (which can cause a serious accident on the street or track).

If you hit a big pothole aluminum will be more prone to crack whereas steel will bend before cracking. Thus I ended up with some tubular steel Maximum Motorsports LCA's with spherical bearings on both ends.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 13, 2007
#5
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #5
wms004 said:
Aluminum is lighter but more prone to breaking. I went to a shop to have them installed and the shop wouldn't install them. They showed me a set where the weld had broken (which can cause a serious accident on the street or track).

If you hit a big pothole aluminum will be more prone to crack whereas steel will bend before cracking. Thus I ended up with some tubular steel Maximum Motorsports LCA's with spherical bearings on both ends.
Click to expand...

I most likely will goes with the steel anyways because it's cheaper for me. I don't drive crazy in my car, just cruise basically and I try and avoid any bumps or potholes as much as I possibly can. Thanks for the info.
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 13, 2007
#6
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #6
I went with the tubular steel set from Maximum Motorsports.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Dec 13, 2007
#7
  • Dec 13, 2007
  • #7
What is your reason for replacing the LCA's? Straight line grip? Better handling in the twisties?
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 14, 2007
#8
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #8
I have a P1SC Charger on my car and when I hit the gas hard, I can feel the rearend windup from the control arms flexing. Not good. I selected the MM CA-5 lower arms with the heim joint at the axle and the urethane 3 piece bushing at the chassis. I could get the fully heim jointed setup, but I was trying to retain some sort of comfort level with the car. A fully heim jointed setup would be noisey and rough. These arms also incorporate the stock sway bar mounting. To answer your question, it is more a road racing application than drag racing, but MM states it can be used for both. I went with the CHE adjustable uppers so I could adjust the pinion angle because of the Eibach Sportlines I installed.
On another note, I have never heard of the aluminum lower control arms breaking unless the car suffered a hard impact. Afterall, Steeda sells them and there would be a huge liability if these things were failing. Additionally, aluminum lower control arms are standard equipment on the new Roush's.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 14, 2007
#9
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #9
san~man said:
What is your reason for replacing the LCA's? Straight line grip? Better handling in the twisties?
Click to expand...

Mostly straight line grip. I'm not a hardcore racer or anything but it would be nice to put some power to the pavement I plan on doing 1/4 miles pretty much.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 14, 2007
#10
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #10
gsjohnson said:
I went with the tubular steel set from Maximum Motorsports.
Click to expand...

Aren't those pricey though?
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 14, 2007
#11
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #11
They list for $259. I paid $246 to my door. MM stuff is hard to get a deal on. But I felt they were the best buy for the money. There are cheaper arms out there, but MM does a good job of R&D. And they're cheaper than the aluminum ones. Plus we know that all things being equal, the tubular style are stronger than the cheaper rectangular ones.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 14, 2007
#12
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #12
Are the J&M's any good?
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#13
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #13
I'm not familiar with them, unless you're referring to J&M Performance which sells on Ebay.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#14
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #14
gsjohnson said:
I'm not familiar with them, unless you're referring to J&M Performance which sells on Ebay.
Click to expand...

These are the ones I might possibly get

http://www.americanmuscle.com/relocoarstpe.html
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#15
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #15
Interesting...I bought my MM lower arms from American Muscle as well. It was cheapest price I could find on the MMs. The J&Ms look very similar in nature to the MMs. What really gets me is your J&Ms are more money than the MMs. The main difference I see is the J&M uses a urethane bushing at both ends. The MM unit utilizes a heim joint at the axle housing and a 3 piece urethane type bushing at the other end. All things being equal???, the J&M would problably be a little more street friendly without the heim joint. Certainly the heim joint would be more effective in the performance area.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#16
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #16
gsjohnson said:
Interesting...I bought my MM lower arms from American Muscle as well. It was cheapest price I could find on the MMs. The J&Ms look very similar in nature to the MMs. What really gets me is your J&Ms are more money than the MMs. The main difference I see is the J&M uses a urethane bushing at both ends. The MM unit utilizes a heim joint at the axle housing and a 3 piece urethane type bushing at the other end. All things being equal???, the J&M would problably be a little more street friendly without the heim joint. Certainly the heim joint would be more effective in the performance area.
Click to expand...

I heard a lot of people on here use J&M LCA's. It's advertised on this site a lot. How much performance difference would it be between the MM's and the J&M's? Is it that significant?
 
G

gsjohnson

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
81
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#17
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #17
Small diff. You'll be fine with either.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 15, 2007
#18
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #18
gsjohnson said:
Small diff. You'll be fine with either.
Click to expand...

Hey thanks for the input man. I really appreciate it I'll be doing these next after I get my o/r X put on
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 15, 2007
#19
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #19
Id just go for the upr setup. Decent control arms, and the uppers and lowers can be had for 199 in a complete set on ebay.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Dec 15, 2007
#20
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #20
I'm done with urethane bushings on my LCAs...after the first of the year, I'll be replacing em with Maximum Motorsport's MMRLCA-31, with spherical bearings at both ends, spring perches and sway bar mounts.
I tore up my Steeda bushings...yeah, those tough 3 piece bushings ripped into pieces (actually, only the outer pieces tore, but it then allowed tons of flex and felt like th erear axle was moving into the next lane...) This was with zero drag style launches, maybe a handful of burnouts and less than 250 RWHP.
I since swapped to Hotchkis (it was what the local speed shop had in stock on a Saturday afternoon when the Steeda bushings died...so I took what I could get). They also feel sloppy and can be noisy. I figure since I already have a rather harsh ride and little creaks and crap here and there, I really won't mind spherical bearings at both ends.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
335
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
M
Please help me identify this.
  • MattyB77
  • Jul 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
125
The Welcome Wagon Jul 4, 2026
gkomo
C
96-984.6 COBRA MOTOR
  • COWBOY2.3
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
181
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2026
COWBOY2.3
C
C
Electrical Under dash wiring
  • ChicagoMustang
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
137
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?