• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Steeda sport springs, should I get CC's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98V6 K.I.T.T.
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2008
Status
Not open for further replies.

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Jun 28, 2008
#1
  • Jun 28, 2008
  • #1
Simple, do Steeda Sport Springs need Caster/Camber plates? If they don't, I might go with them over H&R SS's because I'm on a tight budget right now and would rather save 200 bucks for C/C plates. Yeah, the drop is better with the SS's but I'm also worried alittle with rubbing issues that low, especially with 275's up front and 315's out back. The stock height is bothering me alot so I got to make a decision.
 

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jun 28, 2008
#2
  • Jun 28, 2008
  • #2
18 inch or 17 inch? With 17's I wouldn't think you should need CC plates.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Jun 28, 2008
#3
  • Jun 28, 2008
  • #3
LOL, yea if you get 22"s then you'll need like 3 CC plates.

To OP, no, you don't need CC plates for those springs.
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Jun 28, 2008
#4
  • Jun 28, 2008
  • #4
Nope, spend your money on the taller lower ball joint and the bump steer kit instead.
 

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Jun 29, 2008
#5
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #5
cool....yeah I'm running 17's. Didn't think I needed them.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 29, 2008
#6
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #6
I have an 81 notchback with a 2001 4.6L motor and transmission in it. I also have the Steeda Sport Springs. My car took an alignment perfectly with the stock struts, and mounting plates. He said the numbers were great. No caster/camber plates needed. My alignment shop is a hot-rod only shop too. Don't take your car to Belle Tire or Sears. They will just sell you stuff you don't need.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 29, 2008
#7
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #7
lowering without MM camber plates is just wrong. yes, it may be able to be put back to Ford specs but Ford specs are crap!! expect tire wear and when you wear the inside edges of both your front tires that $200 you saved by not getting the plates will be going towards a new pair of tires
 

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Jun 29, 2008
#8
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #8
Honestly, if they are able to align it properly then i don't see there being a big problem. The stock suspension held my stock goodyears fine for along time. I'll probably get some down the road if I see problems. But thanks for your advice.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 29, 2008
#9
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #9
98V6 K.I.T.T. said:
Honestly, if they are able to align it properly then i don't see there being a big problem. The stock suspension held my stock goodyears fine for along time. I'll probably get some down the road if I see problems. But thanks for your advice.
Click to expand...

post up the specs when you get it done and i'll let you know if it was done properly. my guess is you will have -1.3* camber. it will be in "spec" but will also eat your tires off!
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Jun 29, 2008
#10
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #10
thats boo hicky
Camber plates arent neccessary, heck even with sportlines if i have a say in it. Go ahead, get ripped off.
If the alignment specs are close nuff' then your good. Who cares if its a little off. I have noticed no abnormal tireware and a little negative camber is a good thing
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jun 29, 2008
#11
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #11
SaleenGT2001 said:
post up the specs when you get it done and i'll let you know if it was done properly. my guess is you will have -1.3* camber. it will be in "spec" but will also eat your tires off!
Click to expand...
he's pretty much right about the degree. I have c-srpings with no plates and am at -.9 degrees on driver and just over a degree on passenger after alignment. Within stock tolerances and i haven't had any unusual tire wear since - but it's not perfect.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 29, 2008
#12
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • #12
Jbauer said:
thats boo hicky
Camber plates arent neccessary, heck even with sportlines if i have a say in it. Go ahead, get ripped off.
If the alignment specs are close nuff' then your good. Who cares if its a little off. I have noticed no abnormal tireware and a little negative camber is a good thing
Click to expand...

i guess you're the ASE tech here, right?? sorry, you're WRONG!! if you dont give a crap about your tires wearing out then dont install the plates. but dont go handing out advice that you dont have any clue about.

and no camber plates with Sportlines?!?! i had those on my car and there is NO WAY IN HELL you can say that your alignment was even close to being in spec. your whole post is simply rediculous.

and i LITTLE negative camber is ok. -1.5* is NOT ok. it WILL cause tire wear issues and is not needed at all on a street car.

if you want any REAL advice from someone who actually works on suspensions 5 days a week let me know! i have a LOT of good info.
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Jun 30, 2008
#13
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #13
OK, you really, really will need these. I don't completely agree with SaleenGT2001 on the need for CC plates, because there are a lot of things going on here that you will need to address that are (for right now) much more important than CC plates. For one thing, your bump steer (what happens under hard breaking or going over bumps) needs to be addressed because the tie rods are no longer in the same relationship as they were stock. Secondly, the roll center of the vehicle is now approximately 6 inches under ground which leads to tire wear, but more importantly very unpredictable handling on the edge of control.
SO, do these first, and you will see adramatic change in the handling of the vehicle, and you will make better use of the lowered vehicle's dynamics, then, if you want go out and buy CC plates but IMO, after these mods, you may not need them.
http://www.steeda.com/products/x2_balljoints.php

http://www.steeda.com/products/bumpsteer_kit.php

If you really like Maxim, they probably make the same thing along with Griggs.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Jun 30, 2008
#14
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #14
SaleenGT2001 said:
i guess you're the ASE tech here, right?? sorry, you're WRONG!! if you dont give a crap about your tires wearing out then dont install the plates. but dont go handing out advice that you dont have any clue about.

and no camber plates with Sportlines?!?! i had those on my car and there is NO WAY IN HELL you can say that your alignment was even close to being in spec. your whole post is simply rediculous.

and i LITTLE negative camber is ok. -1.5* is NOT ok. it WILL cause tire wear issues and is not needed at all on a street car.

if you want any REAL advice from someone who actually works on suspensions 5 days a week let me know! i have a LOT of good info.
Click to expand...


No, haha I don't need any damn advice.
"OO look, I'm a forum nerd, make sure you use you caster plates young man!

Boo hickee i say! boo hickee!
I'm running sportlines with no isolators, and my tires wear just fine!
 
S

swl987

Member
May 6, 2004
200
0
16
Cleveland,Oh
Jun 30, 2008
#15
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #15
I have steeda springs and I did not need c&c plates. After I got 18's one side was maxed out.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 30, 2008
#16
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #16
Jbauer said:
No, haha I don't need any damn advice.
"OO look, I'm a forum nerd, make sure you use you caster plates young man!

Boo hickee i say! boo hickee!
I'm running sportlines with no isolators, and my tires wear just fine!
Click to expand...

i had sportlines with NO isolators also. guess what my camber was at -1.9* that will eat a tire on the inside edge.

anyways like i said, IF ANYONE NEEDS ANY REAL ADVICE, PM ME.

i'm done putting up with idiots who have no idea what they are talking about!!!!:Zip2:

Jbauer on ignore............
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Jun 30, 2008
#17
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #17
Theres no need to resort to these sort of remarks bud.
I consider myself a pretty knowledgable person... Well, enough to the point of reason anyway. Sportline + no iso = good tireware for me.
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Jun 30, 2008
#18
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #18
Thread closed. Please keep it civil, everyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
9
Suspension Tires rubbing. Looking for spring recommendation
  • 93blkcoupe
  • Aug 13, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 15, 2020
93blkcoupe
9
B
SOLD 1993 Mustang LX Notchback- 347 Stroker
  • Bzammitt
  • Jun 19, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
7
Views
6K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 10, 2021
Bzammitt
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?