• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

stock 351w and performer rpm intake?! (from germany :) )

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanka
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2004
S

sanka

New Member
May 31, 2002
17
0
0
germany
Mar 26, 2004
#1
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #1
Hey.. my name is Jan... 2 years ago I shipped a 67' Mustang to Germany (where i life) and now it is time to restore it...

The stang has a 351 windsor (seems to be stock, except the cam)
I want to put a edelbrock performer rpm intake on it... will it work with the stock heads? what do I have to modifiy if not ?
What can I excpect from the engine with the new intake ??
Can there be conflicts with the intake and the cam (of wich i do not know anything...)...


THX VERY MUCH FOR YOUR HELP....greetz from germany.. BY JAN....
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Mar 26, 2004
#2
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #2
the intake should bolt up with no problems.

as for performance, you should have a crisper throttle response compared to stock.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Mar 26, 2004
#3
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #3
351W did not come out until 1969 so it is not stock, but there's nothing wrong with that. What intake does it have now? If you have a healthy cam, you need to change intakes to take advantage of it. I'd suggest the Performer R.P.M. Air Gap.
 
S

sanka

New Member
May 31, 2002
17
0
0
germany
Mar 26, 2004
#4
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #4
...Hmm well ... first of all... I know that the engine is not stock in a '67 what i ment is that the engine itself is stock.....


right know it has a 2barrel intake... dunno what brand...


thx for your answers...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 26, 2004
#5
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #5
The RPM will work fine on it, no matter what's inside the motor. Ford used to offer a high rise dual plane for the Windsor ( along with one for the 289-302) that was similar to the RPM. As far as an Air-Gap ? The difference there in performance probably wouldn't register on the seat-of-the-pants meter over a reg. RPM . Either one will do fine, just choose the one you like the best.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Mar 26, 2004
#6
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #6
I have a Performer RPM intake on my 69 windsor, with stock heads and cam, and it runs great. The throttle response is great, I even get comments from other people how they are surprised at the crispness of the throttle.
I can't compare it to a stock intake, as I've never had a stock intake on this motor.

It will bolt right up with no problems.
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Mar 27, 2004
#7
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #7
I have same kind of setup: -69 351w, with Crower cam, stock heads, hedman headers. I chose performer (not RPM), cause I got it cheap... I don´t think there is so big difference with stock heads? If you are going to update your heads in near future, then deffinetly go with Performer RPM or Weiand Stealth. This regular performer also has a little lower profile than RPM, so check your hood clearence before buying RPM... Nice to see there is Stangs also in Germany.
 
S

sanka

New Member
May 31, 2002
17
0
0
germany
Mar 27, 2004
#8
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #8
Hey... THX a lot for your help guys.....


The US CAR scene is actually really big in Germany...

If you wann visit the webpage of the garage where i work at...
THERE U GO -> www.stevies-garage.de

if u do not understang German than go for the first three links and u will see some pictures of US UK and German classics....

CYA JAN
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 27, 2004
#9
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #9
sanka said:
Hey... THX a lot for your help guys.....


The US CAR scene is actually really big in Germany...

If you wann visit the webpage of the garage where i work at...
THERE U GO -> www.stevies-garage.de

if u do not understang German
Click to expand...
It's OK, there's lots of us that still enjoy just lookin at the pictures
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
538
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
212
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
321
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
951
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?