• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

stock h pipe low end or upr high end?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Modular2v
  • Start date Start date Sep 8, 2004

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 8, 2004
#1
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #1
Ok guys considering my mods what should i stay with? I just recently put my factory h pipe back on so i could take my car into ford for the t3650 fix. (afraid they might void my warranty) but this was the 1st time i had the factory h pipe on with my 4.10s AND WOW!!! the thing feel likes it has alot of low end torque...but top end went to hell! With the upr it felt the exact opposite...low end was crap but high end was good. Is the upr worth keeping on? i would like to see a dyno graph comparing the two.
 
J

jbrown

New Member
Aug 5, 2003
393
0
0
Tallahassee, FL
Sep 9, 2004
#2
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #2
the upr should give you more horsepower and about the same or a little less torque.
 

Premium Speed

New Member
Apr 22, 2003
1,006
0
0
Houston, Texas
Sep 9, 2004
#3
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #3
Modular2v said:
Ok guys considering my mods what should i stay with? I just recently put my factory h pipe back on so i could take my car into ford for the t3650 fix. (afraid they might void my warranty) but this was the 1st time i had the factory h pipe on with my 4.10s AND WOW!!! the thing feel likes it has alot of low end torque...but top end went to hell! With the upr it felt the exact opposite...low end was crap but high end was good. Is the upr worth keeping on? i would like to see a dyno graph comparing the two.
Click to expand...

i don't have any dyno's but i felt the same difference when my friend and i swapped his o/r x for the stock h to pass emissions...i have heard that you can lose a little torque on a stock engine with an o/r pipe...i could be wrong
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
795
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
348
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?