• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

stock intake question

  • Thread starter Thread starter NYSTANG
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2004
N

NYSTANG

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
289
0
0
Rochester, NY
Feb 6, 2004
#1
  • Feb 6, 2004
  • #1
will a one intake intake spacer eliminate the "choking" effect of a stock intake above 4500 rpm? if so what other modifications are needed, egr etc....
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Feb 6, 2004
#2
  • Feb 6, 2004
  • #2
no...the stock intake is just made restrictive thats all there is to it. In order to fix that you either have to have it ported out or do what I did and throw out that POS and get an aftermarket intake.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Feb 6, 2004
#3
  • Feb 6, 2004
  • #3
By adding a spacer you are lengthening the runners which will make it even worse. Just remember, a general rule of thumb is that the shorter the runner length, the higher up in the rpm range the intake will make power. The only way to fix it is to shorten the runner length (you may be able to mill a little of the upper and lower intake were they meet) or swap it for somehting better like an edelbrock.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Feb 6, 2004
#4
  • Feb 6, 2004
  • #4
Killercanary said:
By adding a spacer you are lengthening the runners which will make it even worse. Just remember, a general rule of thumb is that the shorter the runner length, the higher up in the rpm range the intake will make power. The only way to fix it is to shorten the runner length (you may be able to mill a little of the upper and lower intake were they meet) or swap it for somehting better like an edelbrock.
Click to expand...
Paul is right....best bet if you wanna keep the stock intake is send it to TMOSS....he has gotten solid results with ported stockers....im gonna agree with Paul and reccomend the edelbrock but its up to you really



Anthony
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
269
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
P
Vacuum
  • ProTechAutoServices
  • Aug 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 2, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
420
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
J
SN95 Hello new to this app
  • James S
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
164
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?