• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Stock MAF with upgraded Throttle body?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NickMadore
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2020
  • Tags Tags
    cold air intake maf throttle body

NickMadore

Member
Apr 5, 2020
3
1
11
Quebec
Apr 5, 2020
#1
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #1
Hi everyone,

This is my first ever post. I have a 1991 Mustang 5.0 LX. I'm looking to increase the air flow to the engine. First of all, I would like to change the original intake for a cold air intake. I will also change the original throttle body for a 70mm. That said, should I upgrade the original 55mm MAF? I think that keeping the original would create a restriction... Am I right?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3543.webp
    560.1 KB · Views: 443

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,100
21,283
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 5, 2020
#2
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #2
NickMadore said:
I would like to change the original intake for a cold air intake
Click to expand...


The original [is] a cold air intake.

NickMadore said:
I will also change the original throttle body for a 70mm
Click to expand...

Generally, doing this mod on an otherwise stock motor will result fewer drive-ability manners and little or no increase in power.

NickMadore said:
That said, should I upgrade the original 55mm MAF?
Click to expand...

It would be pointless to consider without upgrading this and either porting or replacing the upper/lower manifolds.

NickMadore said:
I think that keeping the original would create a restriction
Click to expand...

You would shift the bottle neck to this point. The current bottle necks are the intake and heads.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,100
21,283
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 5, 2020
#3
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #3
Oh and.... Great looking ride! I wouldn't change a thing
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 5, 2020
#4
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #4
A cold air intake is a waste, you will gain virtually nothing on a stock engine. If you haven't done headers and exhaust, that is where I would start. If you have, then look at a better intake manifold, mass air meter and throttle body.

Chris
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,100
21,283
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 5, 2020
#5
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #5
Mstng93SSP said:
A cold air intake is a waste, you will gain virtually nothing on a stock engine. If you haven't done headers and exhaust, that is where I would start. If you have, then look at a better intake manifold, mass air meter and throttle body.

Chris
Click to expand...


I would hazard to guess that [something] has already been done to the exhaust

 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 5, 2020
#6
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #6
Sure, rub it in that you can see minute details with your youthful vision......
 
Reactions: revhead347

NickMadore

Member
Apr 5, 2020
3
1
11
Quebec
Apr 5, 2020
#7
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #7
The exhaust has been changed from headers to back. I do have in mind to change the Intake manifold..
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,100
21,283
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 5, 2020
#8
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #8
Mstng93SSP said:
Sure, rub it in that you can see minute details with your youthful vision......
Click to expand...


I have two different set of readers next to the computer
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Apr 5, 2020
#9
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #9
Stock intake manifold? I’d start there
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 5, 2020
#10
  • Apr 5, 2020
  • #10
There is no advantage to either. If you are looking to get some cheap fun out of the car, don't start with the engine. Swap the rearend gear to a 3.73:1. That will give you 10 times more fun than a MAF or throttle body swap.

Kurt
 
Reactions: dnodge, Mstng93SSP, 90sickfox and 1 other person

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,620
194
NJ
Apr 6, 2020
#11
  • Apr 6, 2020
  • #11
I can say with certainty, swapping the stock maf for a 75mm pro M with 19's works.
.2 every time.
I was told back in the day by credible sources, then I and a few friends track tested it at atco.
Swapping the meter between cars netted .2 nearly every time.
Not bad for a $100 used meter.
Is .2 setting the world on fire? No, but for 5 minutes worth of work and a 100 bucks (used), why not?
 

NickMadore

Member
Apr 5, 2020
3
1
11
Quebec
Apr 6, 2020
#12
  • Apr 6, 2020
  • #12
revhead347 said:
There is no advantage to either. If you are looking to get some cheap fun out of the car, don't start with the engine. Swap the rearend gear to a 3.73:1. That will give you 10 times more fun than a MAF or throttle body swap.

Kurt
Click to expand...

I actually have a 3.55 gear. The 3.73 was removed a couple weeks after it was installed. Althought it was fun on take offs, I didn't like it as much at 80 mph on the highway. (I do highway a lot)
 
Reactions: revhead347
D

Deleted member 215073

Apr 6, 2020
#13
  • Apr 6, 2020
  • #13
I got a 70mm MAF housing from a 1994-1995 T-Bird, and a sensor from a 1994-1995 Mustang. Put the two together and it looks factory and runs fine. I'm pretty sure I gained some power on an otherwise stock engine. You could also install a 5.0L Explorer throttle body. Those are 65mm.

If it hasn't already been done, remove the intake silencer from airbox.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Apr 6, 2020
#14
  • Apr 6, 2020
  • #14
Intake, heads, long tube headers, and a cam are where the power is. If these are done I would start thinking about a tb and Bigger maf.
 
Reactions: revhead347

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,620
194
NJ
Apr 7, 2020
#15
  • Apr 7, 2020
  • #15
96pushrod said:
Intake, heads, long tube headers, and a cam are where the power is. If these are done I would start thinking about a tb and Bigger maf.
Click to expand...
I'm on the fence with that statement.
It's like saying do everything or do nothing.
My theory is do whatever you like, just do not waste your time pulling the heads and the cam unless you are going to use quality parts. It's just too much work for say gt40 iron heads.

I don't take issue with intakes, meters, Tb's, exhaust etc. People have to start somewhere. And yes some of those things could need to be replaced when you get to heads/cam, but if you purchase wisely most intake parts can be bought and sold at the same price (used of course).

Keep in mind, people should however understand that if you skip the heads/cam you aren't going to get much more than 240rwhp (which isn't terrible since the car only has about 200rwhp to begin with)

As for long tubes, I personally don't like them. Clearance issues, pain to install, mid pipe problems.
I don't see the value on anything other than a stroker and even them I wouldn't use them.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Apr 7, 2020
#16
  • Apr 7, 2020
  • #16
2000xp8 said:
I'm on the fence with that statement.
It's like saying do everything or do nothing.
My theory is do whatever you like, just do not waste your time pulling the heads and the cam unless you are going to use quality parts. It's just too much work for say gt40 iron heads.

I don't take issue with intakes, meters, Tb's, exhaust etc. People have to start somewhere. And yes some of those things could need to be replaced when you get to heads/cam, but if you purchase wisely most intake parts can be bought and sold at the same price (used of course).

Keep in mind, people should however understand that if you skip the heads/cam you aren't going to get much more than 240rwhp (which isn't terrible since the car only has about 200rwhp to begin with)

As for long tubes, I personally don't like them. Clearance issues, pain to install, mid pipe problems.
I don't see the value on anything other than a stroker and even them I wouldn't use them.
Click to expand...
I wasn’t so much saying you have to do them all at once, more that those items are what will bring more power. Not that I’m against new throttle bodies or mafs, it’s just that those alone won’t make much more power. A set of heads will though

I’m probably one of the few people on here who wouldn’t ever buy anything under an 80mm Tb for a stock engine. I don’t see the point of upgrading just to go 10 or 15mm bigger when the larger bore won’t cause any issue.

Any kind of headers except a long tube are a waste of money on almost any engine. Long tube will make more power throughout the entire rpm range, even more at lower engine speeds. This has been proven time and time again I’ve installed a ton of long tube headers, and I’ll agree they are a bitch, but worth it in the end.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 7, 2020
#17
  • Apr 7, 2020
  • #17
96pushrod said:
Intake, heads, long tube headers, and a cam are where the power is. If these are done I would start thinking about a tb and Bigger maf.
Click to expand...

I agree. Doing the MAF and TB is inconsequential. It's only going to flow as much air as the smallest hole can muster.

Kurt
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 7, 2020
#18
  • Apr 7, 2020
  • #18
NickMadore said:
I actually have a 3.55 gear. The 3.73 was removed a couple weeks after it was installed. Althought it was fun on take offs, I didn't like it as much at 80 mph on the highway. (I do highway a lot)
Click to expand...

I actually prefer the 3.55s myself. I agree on the highway drone with the 3.73:1 gears.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
589
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
265
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
571
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
194
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
Keeps dying with new cold air intake
  • Creomod
  • Oct 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2024
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?