• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Stock rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangzroastrice
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2007

stangzroastrice

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
278
0
16
Belmar, NJ (Jersey Shore)
May 28, 2007
#1
  • May 28, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys, I've been debating, I'm going to be running the comp cams xe270hr-14 with my gt40p motor and see many posts saying that roller rockers are a minimal gain in power especially for the price. This cam is for use with 1.6 rockers and because the stock oem rockers are 1.6 ratio, should I just stick with these rather than investing in a set of pedestal rockers? I have a stock set laying around, so saving the hundred bucks on rockers would be nice, but would like opinions on how this will affect my setup using the stock rockers. Let me know, thanks!
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
May 29, 2007
#2
  • May 29, 2007
  • #2
I ran stock rockers with my GT40 Y303s for over a year with no problems other than my pushrods were too short and made the infamous ticking noise.
Once I installed my Crane Cobra 1.7:1 roller rockers the ticking went away.
With a new cam checking for pushrod length is a good idea.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 29, 2007
#3
  • May 29, 2007
  • #3
The oem stamped steel peds should work ok
and
They will not make as much noise as ped rr's

I agree you to want ensure the valve train geometry is good
to go as the new parts could cause you need new pr's as
was said above.

Grady
 

stangzroastrice

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
278
0
16
Belmar, NJ (Jersey Shore)
May 29, 2007
#4
  • May 29, 2007
  • #4
Hmm... I'm still debating considering I may be running these GT40P's for awhile, so stud mount rockers may not be in consideration for another year or two, maybe I will buy some roller rockers who knows... For that XE270HR-14 camshaft I had a previous thread about, should I go with 1.6 or 1.7 roller rockers, I figured 1.6, but see some setups running 1.7's??? Oh and get this, I found that cam used last night for 80 bucks, rather than the 255.95 it is from Summit, score!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 29, 2007
#5
  • May 29, 2007
  • #5
stangzroastrice said:
Hmm... I'm still debating considering I may be running these GT40P's for awhile, so stud mount rockers may not be in consideration for another year or two, maybe I will buy some roller rockers who knows... For that XE270HR-14 camshaft I had a previous thread about, should I go with 1.6 or 1.7 roller rockers, I figured 1.6, but see some setups running 1.7's??? Oh and get this, I found that cam used last night for 80 bucks, rather than the 255.95 it is from Summit, score!
Click to expand...

If you want the very best bang for the buck .........

Just wait until you can score a set of used ped rr's for a nice price

Then if you wanna move up to an after market Aluminum head later
on and go with studs ... you can let the used peds go with the oem
iron heads which will only make it easier to sell them.

One last thing you might not know ........
TFS heads only accept stud rockers

Grady
 

stangzroastrice

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
278
0
16
Belmar, NJ (Jersey Shore)
May 29, 2007
#6
  • May 29, 2007
  • #6
oh most definitely I was going to go with a used set, yeah its only another 120-150 bucks, so might as well do it....
thanks for the info...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
779
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
352
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
392
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?