• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

street tire traction question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allforspeed
  • Start date Start date May 15, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
May 15, 2005
#1
  • May 15, 2005
  • #1
TRUE STREET TIRES, which one will hook up better, 17 inch 245/45 or a 15 inch 235/60,


does the increased sidewall of the 15 inch tire overcome the width advantage of the 17 inch tire? i'm talking comparable true street tires, no DR's, at the strip, maybe some of your 60ft times on street tires would be cool
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
May 15, 2005
#2
  • May 15, 2005
  • #2
15's will hook alot better than 17's
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
May 15, 2005
#3
  • May 15, 2005
  • #3
so this holds true even for non slick street tires? i'm asking because it seems like dudes on 225/60 15's pull sub 2 second 60 foot times occasionally but i always hear that a wider tire will give better traction?! what 60 foot times have you put down on street tires and what size were they?
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
May 15, 2005
#4
  • May 15, 2005
  • #4
i also just got a set of 17X9 cobra rims with tires for virtually free and am wondring if i should keep my 15's or if the 17's will offer more traction on street tires?
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
May 15, 2005
#5
  • May 15, 2005
  • #5
are you really worried about traction or looks???

I would keep the 17's and throw on some nitto 555r's

the width is a factor, but not as big of a factor as many people think

a 245/45/17 will grip the same(if not better) than a 315/30/17

The sidewall has alot to do with it, along with the compound of the tire
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 15, 2005
#6
  • May 15, 2005
  • #6
Well I ran 245/45/17s at the track, and ran 2.0 60's all day. This was my first track experience on radials with a stick, and it went alright. The guys with the 15" tires (although they only had one pass on them) were stuck in the 2.1s+!

Its more about the compound than the width when comparing similar sizes!
 

ramjetlx

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
212
0
0
Honolulu, Hawaii
May 15, 2005
#7
  • May 15, 2005
  • #7
Im also running 245/45/17's and my 60 foot is a constant 2.0. My tires are Potenza S03's, but I have to heat them up before a run to get them sticky. And I also have a drag bag in the right rear spring set at 35psi. Thats seems to give me the most consistent 60 foots....
 

deadlast

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
495
0
0
Belmont, MA
May 15, 2005
#8
  • May 15, 2005
  • #8
small thread jack, but whats the widest, tallest tire you can put on an 18x9?
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
May 15, 2005
#9
  • May 15, 2005
  • #9
deadlast said:
small thread jack, but whats the widest, tallest tire you can put on an 18x9?
Click to expand...

on a 9inch i wouldn't go wider than 275, height-i would go about 35/40....any more than 40 and it will look really tall
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
May 15, 2005
#10
  • May 15, 2005
  • #10
i'm not really concerned with looks, the car is already kind of ugly was just wondering if either would make a noticable difference in traction, but it seems like they are pretty much the same with maybe the edge going to the 17X9's so i guess i'll put on the cobras!
 
F

fiveohGT

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
353
1
0
Fairfax Virginia
May 15, 2005
#11
  • May 15, 2005
  • #11
15s prob weigh less though
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 15, 2005
#12
  • May 15, 2005
  • #12
This is a sidewall issue. 17 inch tires have stiffer sidewalls as opposed to a 15 inch tire. Just like slicks, a street tire will wrinkle on launch, even if it's so little that you can't see it. 17s have little if any sidewall wrinkle, and break lose easier than a 15. In the end though, some practice and a decent street tire would pretty much level the playing field between the two.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
May 15, 2005
#13
  • May 15, 2005
  • #13
I went from 225/60R15 on 15x7 turbines to 275/40R17 Futura Ultra Z's on 17x9 Cobra R wheels. I was expecting to hook, considering they looked twice as wide in the back, nope, my street traction was about the same and worse at the track. Couldn't do much better at the track even with Nitto DR's. I would have swapped back to the turbines if they weren't so ugly. Today I traded my Cobra R's with DR's for a set of Welds even with standard radials.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 15, 2005
#14
  • May 15, 2005
  • #14
Too many variables to come up with just one answer - compound, wheel width, sidewall stiffness/speed rating of the tires, etc. One of the biggest issues that only one person has mentioned is the relative weight. The 17" combo will usually weigh significantly more - and it takes power to turn that additional weight. All else equal, the car on 15's will accelerate more quickly....simple physics.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
May 16, 2005
#15
  • May 16, 2005
  • #15
Michael Yount said:
Too many variables to come up with just one answer - compound, wheel width, sidewall stiffness/speed rating of the tires, etc. One of the biggest issues that only one person has mentioned is the relative weight. The 17" combo will weigh significantly more - and it takes power to turn that additional weight. All else equal, the car on 15's will accelerate more quickly....simple physics.
Click to expand...

Good point Michael but have you picked up a set of old-school centerlines latley? A buddy of mine had some and they were really heavy. I belive they were crome plated thick steel wheels.

I traded my Cobra R's for welds and wow what a weight difference.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 16, 2005
#16
  • May 16, 2005
  • #16
90Mustang - I was simply trying to point out that the 15" packages have the potential to weight significantly less; no doubt there are 'tank' 15 inchers too....so I editted to say the 17" will USUALLY weigh more. Thanks.

The same is true on the 17" end - lighter and heavier stuff is out there.

But if you seek light weight in either size, you'll accelerate, turn, stop more quickly. And there's lighter stuff available in the 15" and even 16" sizes than there are in the 17" size.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
May 16, 2005
#17
  • May 16, 2005
  • #17
Michael Yount said:
90Mustang - I was simply trying to point out that the 15" packages have the potential to weight significantly less; no doubt there are 'tank' 15 inchers too....so I editted to say the 17" will USUALLY weigh more. Thanks.

The same is true on the 17" end - lighter and heavier stuff is out there.

But if you seek light weight in either size, you'll accelerate, turn, stop more quickly. And there's lighter stuff available in the 15" and even 16" sizes than there are in the 17" size.
Click to expand...

I was just messin' with you, I knew that's what you meant, usually a 17 weights much more than a 15.
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
May 16, 2005
#18
  • May 16, 2005
  • #18
Here's something I've always wondered on this issue:

Shouldnt taller tires (distance from ground to top of tires) make the car accelerate better since you now have a greater velocity at the contact patch due to the larger radius of the wheel? You get more distance for the same amount of tire revolutions.
 
B

Biggeley

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
136
0
0
May 16, 2005
#19
  • May 16, 2005
  • #19
crazypete said:
Here's something I've always wondered on this issue:

Shouldnt taller tires (distance from ground to top of tires) make the car accelerate better since you now have a greater velocity at the contact patch due to the larger radius of the wheel? You get more distance for the same amount of tire revolutions.
Click to expand...


A larger radius tire is going to change your effective gear ratio - less turns at the wheel per turns of the driveshaft. That may or may not make the car accelerate better, depending on whether or not it is beneficial to your setup to have less effective gear ratio.

Tire diameter makes a big difference in the effective gear ratio department.. Loosely calculated.. It's something like this:

Starting with 26" tire and 4.10 gear
27" tire -- effective gear ratio becomes ~ 3.90
28" tire -- effective gear ratio becomes ~ 3.73
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 16, 2005
#20
  • May 16, 2005
  • #20
Pete - as Biggeley says, it's exactly the OPPOSITE effect from what you've stated. A taller tire is like putting less gear in; a shorter tire is like putting more gear in -- assuming traction characteristics of the two tires are the same.

So, with traction, you'll generally accelerate LESS quickly with a taller tire.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Tire size question 1986 gt hatchback
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
B0udreaux
B
9
Wheels-Tires Tire Pressures
  • 916er
  • May 30, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
823
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
A
I need help please!
  • Azhi23
  • Oct 26, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2022
limp
V
WHEELS N RIMS
  • VICTOIRA66
  • Jan 17, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
843
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2021
VICTOIRA66
V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?