• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

strength of the early 302 blocks compared to the 5.0 roller blocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkoStoj
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2008

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Apr 24, 2008
#1
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #1
I know the stock 5.0L roller motors out of fox bodies tend to split at around 550hp with all stock bottom end. I have heard in the past that the early (late 60's) 302 blocks were built with more beef throughout them. I was wondering if these early blocks would be able to handle more hp reliably than the later roller blocks...
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Apr 24, 2008
#2
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #2
A stock block will split when it wants to, theres no magic number of how much hp it can live with.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Apr 24, 2008
#3
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #3
If you want 1001rwhp you need an after market block. There is no way around it.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 24, 2008
#4
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #4
all 289/302/5.0 blocks are quite similar in strength, with the exception of the boss 302 block. the early blocks will handle a bit more power before they split apart, but not enough to try and find an early block in good enough shape to build.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Apr 24, 2008
#5
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #5
Not to start an arguement but...

My engine builder highly recomended a pre 1982 block because of strength. Knowing nothing about the subject I asked Ed Curtis about it, he is a cam builder (real good one) and he agreed with my builder that the older blocks are stronger.

I used a 78 bronco block myself.

They quit making the 2 peice rear main seals in 1982, supposedly thats the last year of the heavier blocks.
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Apr 24, 2008
#6
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #6
blocks stamped "mexican" are beefier as well
 

enferno

Member
Jun 20, 2006
418
2
16
Apr 24, 2008
#7
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #7
the older blocks had a higher nickel content (i think) which is what makes them stronger.

if you are going with your really high HP goal as you stated, there are many after market blocks that are much stronger than stock ones.
 
Reactions: Jesse Hayes

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 24, 2008
#8
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #8
enferno said:
the older blocks had a higher nickel content (i think) which is what makes them stronger.
Click to expand...

i wish this myth would go away.
 

enferno

Member
Jun 20, 2006
418
2
16
Apr 24, 2008
#9
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #9
rbohm said:
i wish this myth would go away.
Click to expand...

that's why i said i think.

i've heard both sides of the story, but i've heard the nickel content way more frequently.


so, are the older blocks not stronger, or are they stronger, but not because of the nickel?
 
Reactions: Jesse Hayes

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Apr 24, 2008
#10
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #10
My builder referred to mass

as in lbs of steel, said the crank was 10 or 15 lbs heavier too. Thats only thing I was informed about.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Apr 24, 2008
#11
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #11
I won't lie, its not for wussies....being WOT on a 500hp+ stock block is scary

you know how it is Iskwezm


I really don't want an aftermarket block because I know once I do- its going from 9psi to 15-20psi and I don't think i'll ever be ready for that.
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Apr 24, 2008
#12
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #12
make sure you buy a diaper, cuz that oils going on the back tire
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 24, 2008
#13
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #13
The best older block behind the Boss 302 and the Mex block is the 78-up D8VE casting. That one's got 10 lbs more iron than the earlier and later (80-85 block) The 1980-84 blocks are junk. Ditto for the early 50 oz cranks. The best roller blocks are the E6SE & later castings. They have 6 lbs more iron than the 85 roller blocks. Ditto on the "high nickel myth" Nickel makes iron harder to machine, hence the unlikelyhood more nickel was added to any production block. Special application castings? Yea, that's a definate possibility.
 

HookandLadder

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
261
0
17
St Louis
Apr 24, 2008
#14
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • #14
Anything over 450-500 and it could go. There is not enough beef in the cam valley and it splits from there on. Guys have run 600 before, but it was a rarity. Been there done that.

 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Apr 25, 2008
#15
  • Apr 25, 2008
  • #15
12sec67 said:
I won't lie, its not for wussies....being WOT on a 500hp+ stock block is scary

you know how it is Iskwezm


I really don't want an aftermarket block because I know once I do- its going from 9psi to 15-20psi and I don't think i'll ever be ready for that.
Click to expand...
I know right now, im getting on it more and longer but my foot starts twitching to let off
 
6

66forfun

Member
Feb 25, 2006
260
0
16
Pittsburgh
Apr 26, 2008
#16
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #16
My 347 ford shortblock came with a sportsman "b" block, it looked to have the heavier webbing like the old mexicans. They sold the 347 longblock "z cam" rated @ 450hp when I bought mine, this was pre boss blocks. Now no shortblock from ford and the longblock comes with the boss block. Mine should carry 450hp (without boost or juice) for a long long time before any problems with the block.
 
G

grumpy150

Active Member
Dec 12, 2017
125
27
38
Mid michigan
Dec 16, 2017
#17
  • Dec 16, 2017
  • #17
12sec67 said:
I won't lie, its not for wussies....being WOT on a 500hp+ stock block is scary

you know how it is Iskwezm


I really don't want an aftermarket block because I know once I do- its going from 9psi to 15-20psi and I don't think i'll ever be ready for that.
Click to expand...
Lmao
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
961
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
667
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?