• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Stroker or Turbo? You pick....

  • Thread starter Thread starter nmcgrawj
  • Start date Start date Nov 15, 2005

Which route would u go?

  • Turbo 358w

    Votes: 12 63.2%
  • Stroked 410w

    Votes: 7 36.8%

  • Total voters
    19
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 15, 2005
#1
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #1
What route would u guys pick and why? 408w or a turbo 358. I know people have different goals and such so dont get too detailed on me. Just let me know which setup you guys would rather have, positives/negatives about each one in your opinion.


And assuming that the price difference between the stroker and turbo would be about another $1,000 in favor of the turbo.


Lets hear it!
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Nov 15, 2005
#2
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #2
I would go stout H/C/I 408 so there is always turbo or super that can be added to the bigger motor later.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 15, 2005
#3
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #3
94-302-vert said:
I would go stout H/C/I 408 so there is always turbo or super that can be added to the bigger motor later.
Click to expand...


Thats the thing....more cubes in a turbo application is not always a good thing. I think guys prefer to actually keep the cubes lower when going turbo.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 15, 2005
#4
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #4
Nate - turbos LOVE stroke. The more piston speed you give a turbo, the happier it is.

With that said, I don't like power adders. Making power is too easy, and achieving the track times you want is nothing more than turning the wick up.

Joe
 

soontobefastfox

Member
Nov 15, 2005
275
0
16
Troy, Michigan
Nov 15, 2005
#5
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #5
the stroker should be way less than the turbo because with a turbo you need to add alot of things that you dont think you need. Trust me I almost ventured down that route.

Negatives about a turbo (you have to spend alot of money, I dont know if you ever priced it out but these are items you will need to do it right, yes you can do half assed and have everything break, but if you want to do it right you need these parts.):
race block with forged rotating assembly
big heads like vic jrs
spyder intake or some short runner intake
a whole new fuel system (a 255 won't cut it you'll need an A1000 pump)
a custom ground cam would be best
an auto trans because with a turbo you're going after huge gains and most of the time you can't control that kind of power and you'll need an auto to get your best et. And also you dont want to have a violently shifting street car.

theres soo much more that people don't think about when going the route of a turbo. Some do it half assed and use their stock short block but that is a time bomb waiting to explode.

I agree with 94-302-vert on this one because you can always add the power adder in the future.

And I priced out everything that I was going to need to buy to do a correct 331 turbo mustang and it cost 21549. And I would imagine it would even cost more for a 351w.

just my opinion.
 
H

hookups333

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
154
0
0
Jax Florida
Nov 15, 2005
#6
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #6
Also with a turbo it will be less fun than an N/A car. Reason being is spool time.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 15, 2005
#7
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #7
hookups333 said:
Also with a turbo it will be less fun than an N/A car. Reason being is spool time.
Click to expand...
A properly built turbo set-up should have ZERO turbo lag....

Joe
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Nov 15, 2005
#8
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #8
Agreed with Joe. That's the joy of having a twin turbo set up, with smaller turbo's. They would take barely any time to spool with a proper set up, and, as proven by GreenMustangGT, can produce wads of power at relatively low boost levels.

Big cubes with smaller turbo's = good time. I would put some research into it and go with both
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Nov 15, 2005
#9
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #9
I'd go with the turbo. Like mentioned above, it is pricey but has a lot more power than the stroker alone, depending on what turbo you use of course.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Nov 15, 2005
#10
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #10
turbo 302!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 15, 2005
#11
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #11
Nate, do you wanna hear my answer again? Listen to what my buddy Joe is telling you.
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Nov 15, 2005
#12
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #12
do you have a 2 bolt or 4 bolt 351 (or what are you planning on)?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 15, 2005
#13
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #13
Nate, if you still had a 302 I'd say turbo it without a doubt, but since you already have a windsor platform to work from I'd go with the big cubed NA setup. The 408 with the right parts should have no problem being a 10 second capable machine at the very least. I've been kicking around the same ideas in my head too with my next build... a high compression 347 or a turbo'd 306. Excluding building a dart based shortblock for the turbo 306 it WILL be cheaper for me to go that route. If I go 347 I have to replace EVERYTHING under my hood except the block and the total is over what a turbo and fuel system will cost... the turbo will make much more power too. But, like Joe I love running good numbers NA and I too have viewed power adders as "cheating" so to say. But, I can't look past the fact that even with a killer 347 I'd be VERY hard pressed to trap 120 in my car, and 120mph will be a walk in the park at even 5-6lbs of boost with a turbo 306. Plus, there are a number of imports around me now that are mid-low 11 second cars that are all trapping 120+mph in the 1/4. I don't know its worth it for me to spend thousands of dollars replacing everything and stroking my motor just for the sake of staying NA. I need to finish my decisions soon though...
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Nov 15, 2005
#14
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #14
ttttttttttturbo!!
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Nov 15, 2005
#15
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #15
i would buy a bunch of used nascar stuff and make a 335ci windsor that will spinn to 8500 and make 600hp.

it is doable and more affordable than you might think.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Nov 15, 2005
#16
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #16
for raw power you know i chose turbo
 

mricci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
301
0
17
Massachusetts
Nov 15, 2005
#17
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #17
I have a 351w block sitting in my shed for when i have the money to rebuild and turbo it, I would go turbo.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 15, 2005
#18
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #18
soontobefastfox said:
the stroker should be way less than the turbo because with a turbo you need to add alot of things that you dont think you need. Trust me I almost ventured down that route.

Negatives about a turbo (you have to spend alot of money, I dont know if you ever priced it out but these are items you will need to do it right, yes you can do half assed and have everything break, but if you want to do it right you need these parts.):
race block with forged rotating assembly
big heads like vic jrs
spyder intake or some short runner intake
a whole new fuel system (a 255 won't cut it you'll need an A1000 pump)
a custom ground cam would be best
an auto trans because with a turbo you're going after huge gains and most of the time you can't control that kind of power and you'll need an auto to get your best et. And also you dont want to have a violently shifting street car.

theres soo much more that people don't think about when going the route of a turbo. Some do it half assed and use their stock short block but that is a time bomb waiting to explode.

I agree with 94-302-vert on this one because you can always add the power adder in the future.

And I priced out everything that I was going to need to buy to do a correct 331 turbo mustang and it cost 21549. And I would imagine it would even cost more for a 351w.

just my opinion.
Click to expand...


Actually, i have priced everything out using the help of Mike(oink) and turbomustangs.com. That stuff u list is what i would call "going all out". Yes it is probably the "best" way to do it, but a different way spending less money isnt NOT necessarily worst. Look at all the guys on turbomustangs.com that dont spend an 1/8th of what you listed and still run pretty respectable times. Like for instance, my tko-600 would do just fine for now. Its not a race car so im not going to have a "NEED" for consistant times...sticks are still more fun to me as a street car. Anyway.....

Thanks everyone for their input...lol its the same stuff i've been telling myself. For those that dont know, i have the 351 in the car now with ported twisted wedge heads, custom cam, and tfs-r intake, so its a pretty healthy setup....or was

From what i have setup in a excel worksheet, it would take about $2,000 give or take a couple depending on if i went single or twin, and what good deals i caught(good deal= even less $$$ spent, im not anticipating them) And for the stroker, i was planning on about $1,000 in machine work and about another $1100 in parts. BUT, i would rebuild the shortblock for the turbo, so that $1,000 could be taken away from both options. Leaving the 2k and 1.1k.


Keep the opinions comin if ya got em
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 15, 2005
#19
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #19
Grn92LX said:
Nate, do you wanna hear my answer again? Listen to what my buddy Joe is telling you.
Click to expand...


So u think u dont have to vote?

bimmertech said:
i would buy a bunch of used nascar stuff and make a 335ci windsor that will spinn to 8500 and make 600hp.

it is doable and more affordable than you might think.
Click to expand...

Please feel FREE to explain more here or in a PM
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Nov 15, 2005
#20
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #20
NA less problems in sme cases i know im working on a turbo car that is a friend of mines dont matter how good your parts are or how much you spend unless the tune is good its just wasting money.
Turbo cars take patience in tuning and making sure things are done in correlation as to the power the car can handle and to how much the driver can handle.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
528
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
  • Poll Poll
Fox Foxtoberfest 2025: Registration open!
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
116
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2025
TripleYellow
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Run a 5 channel or use head unit and mono amp for sub?
  • 2000xp8
  • Sep 20, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 23, 2024
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?