• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Stupid question that I should know

  • Thread starter Thread starter slow88stang
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2004

slow88stang

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
144
0
0
St Albert AB
Jul 27, 2004
#1
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #1
If I want my vehicle to accelerate faster then I would want higher or lower gear ratios in my tranny? Which would accelerate my vehicle faster, tranny "A" with 2.75/1.94/1.34/1.00/0.74 or tranny "B" with 3.91/2.24/1.49/1.00/0.80.
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Jul 27, 2004
#2
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #2
slow88stang said:
If I want my vehicle to accelerate faster then I would want higher or lower gear ratios in my tranny? Which would accelerate my vehicle faster, tranny "A" with 2.75/1.94/1.34/1.00/0.74 or tranny "B" with 3.91/2.24/1.49/1.00/0.80.
Click to expand...




the banana says it all respect the banana you will live a long life
 

cjman15

Banned
Apr 15, 2004
1,009
0
0
Fairfield, PA
Jul 27, 2004
#3
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #3
B for banana
 

slow88stang

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
144
0
0
St Albert AB
Jul 27, 2004
#4
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #4
ok FINE THEN!!!
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Jul 27, 2004
#5
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #5
Tranny "B" under most circumstances.

You want it geared so as to put the engine into its power-band and pull through it effectively, in essence using the entire engine rpm power range effectively.

If you have a very broad power band and the gearing spins through the range too quickly you are wasting energy ... it builds torque so quickly that traction becomes an issue ... ie slower et's
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 27, 2004
#6
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #6
True. And you have to remember what rear gear ratio you are using, to determine your final drive ratio for optimal efficiency.
 

mustangsquared

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
828
1
16
new bern nc
Jul 27, 2004
#7
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #7
I am lost...I have 355's in the rear...tranny B will put me through my powerband too fast, thus causing me to shift early..So how is it better for me. I thought close gear ratios were better becuase you stay in your power band longer and when you shift you do not drop out the bottom of your power band.
Correct me if I am wrong on this one.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 27, 2004
#8
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #8
Is this only a street car or are you trying to determine the best combination for the measured 1/4 mile?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jul 28, 2004
#9
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #9
mustangsquared said:
I am lost...I have 355's in the rear...tranny B will put me through my powerband too fast, thus causing me to shift early..So how is it better for me. I thought close gear ratios were better becuase you stay in your power band longer and when you shift you do not drop out the bottom of your power band.
Correct me if I am wrong on this one.
Click to expand...
SB is right. low poop motors (imports) need close ratios. 1st and second gear in the stang cover the same range as 1-5th in my eclipse (per MPH achieved in said cogs) cuz the eclipse makes no power. driving it is like furiously running in sand.

it is different for everyone. for someone like TMoss, who has a fat torque curve like a washboard, he can have wider spaced ratios. someone like me (more peaky), i need them closer. youve gotten past the basic ratio theory, and now SB and others have adapted it into real world applications.
i think people would need some dyno curves to figure out what is best for the given application.
my two cents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 5th Gear Ratio
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
309
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
W
Electrical 91 GT Alternator Replacement Question
  • willrh111
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
377
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
nickyb
J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
181
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
S
  • Locked
Drivetrain Adjustable clutch cable questions
  • Scott_S
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
435
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?