• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Subframe Connectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrGame
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

MrGame

Member
Nov 8, 2006
52
0
7
Mar 20, 2007
#1
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #1
I was thinking about buying a set, but i'm not really educated on how they work. I knwo they connect the 2 subframes and stifften the car, but should i get standard or full-length? and are there any drawbacks? (clearance, etc.?)
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Mar 20, 2007
#2
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #2
Get full length. I dont think there are any drawbacks at all, only that they are overlooked by many people. Maybe because to do it right they need to be welded in?

Shouldnt cause any clearance issues. I've never heard anything negative about SFC's.
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Mar 20, 2007
#3
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #3
Get full length ones. They have a more contact area with your existing subframe. That translates to better support. I never had clearance issues with mine. My rear sway bar is still the lowest point.

Everyone votes for Maximum Motorsports. I got the Laurel Mountain Mustang ones. The design of the SFCs are better. The seat brackets come as one piece. The MM ones come in eight small pieces you have to weld together. The LMM ones have a slight bend in two places. It conforms to your car better. The LMM ones are a tad lighter with a slightly thinner wall but the box construction provide more than adequate support. No need for armor plating.
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Mar 20, 2007
#4
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #4
Full length SFC's are the way to go but there are 2 kinds. Some follow the floorpan of the car and you MIGHT lose an inch of ground clearance in the middle of the car but the best way to look at it is,the SFC's will protect the floorpan from scraping while going over a hump. Some SFC's are a "through the floor" type that require you to cut out 2 sections,per side,of the floor pan and the bars run straight from front to rear with no bending. They are stronger because of that but there will be permanent modification to the car.
 
G

GettinThere

Member
Jul 29, 2005
553
1
19
Central Texas
Mar 21, 2007
#5
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #5
Get full length, if you are going to do it, do it right. Also make sure they are properly welded on. They should be installed while the weight of the car is on the springs/wheels, like on a drive-on lift, and not with the wheels hanging.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Mar 21, 2007
#6
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #6
MrGame said:
I was thinking about buying a set, but i'm not really educated on how they work. I knwo they connect the 2 subframes and stifften the car, but should i get standard or full-length? and are there any drawbacks? (clearance, etc.?)
Click to expand...

They tie the front and rear frames together, if you get standard they won't do that, if you get bolt-in they'll flex and damage your unibody since you drilled holes in it

Dragstr05 said:
Get full length. I dont think there are any drawbacks at all, only that they are overlooked by many people. Maybe because to do it right they need to be welded in?

Shouldnt cause any clearance issues. I've never heard anything negative about SFC's.
Click to expand...

Only clearance issue or drawback is that you can't fit side exhaust on since the connector is in the way of the pipe
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Mar 21, 2007
#7
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #7
I got Global West full length subframe connectors. My handling around corners is incredible and it's one mod that I can FEEL the difference (unlike adding a cold air intake)

You can see my SFC below.

 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Mar 21, 2007
#8
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #8
I think that these guys opinions are right on, however, there is one thing to consider. I autocross in NASA, with a '99 35th anny. I run stock ford convertible subframe connectors for 2 reasons, #1 is that at some point somebody (maybe me) may want to return the car to stock, or, you might get jones'd when you go to trade it in or sell it (or maybe not if it's a performance car enthusiast), I run both the factory bolt ins AND the front subframe structure out of a convertible as well. This really tightens the car up, and although the weld ins are better I have to, #2 run a "stock" car under the NASA rules. I can slide the substructers from the vert by since they are technically a factory part.
 

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 21, 2007
#9
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #9
so if u cant find a drive on lift how do u install them? can u raise the car up and make the wheels sit on rims and then get under to weld? whats everybodys secret who dont have access to a drive on lift...
 

MrGame

Member
Nov 8, 2006
52
0
7
Mar 22, 2007
#10
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #10
and do they make the car handle a lot better?
 
Z

ZakeriD

Member
Jun 29, 2006
112
0
16
Mar 22, 2007
#11
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #11
what would be better... MM full length or steeda/laurel mountain full length with torque box reinforcement?
 
9

99gtsal

New Member
Oct 15, 2005
5
0
0
Mar 22, 2007
#12
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #12
You don't necessarily need to go with full length SFC's. Unless you have a convertible which lacks the built in stiffness of a hard top then you can go with standard SFC's. I had standards installed on mine and have driven in other hard tops with full length SFC's and really have not noticed a huge difference. So, unless you plan on road racing or some kind of extreme driving then standards are fine IMHO.
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Mar 22, 2007
#13
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #13
You can jack the car up on all 4 corners, supported by the front lower control arms, and the axle on the rear. Basically simulate as much as possible, the car sitting on the road. Place the jack stands as far out as possible to the wheels.
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Mar 22, 2007
#14
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #14
blacksheep-1 said:
You can jack the car up on all 4 corners, supported by the front lower control arms, and the axle on the rear. Basically simulate as much as possible, the car sitting on the road. Place the jack stands as far out as possible to the wheels.
Click to expand...

Uhm yeah or just get four drive on ramps and you're good to go
 

99MustangGTman

New Member
Feb 27, 2007
7
0
1
Mar 22, 2007
#15
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #15
get mm full length ones, work great
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Mar 22, 2007
#16
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #16
MrGame said:
and do they make the car handle a lot better?
Click to expand...

definitely. especially on the tight, corner-hugging turns.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Mar 22, 2007
#17
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #17
I've got the steeda full lengths and I love them. I noticed a huge reduction in flex and I can feel a difference in the corners.
 

smokin00GT

New Member
Mar 22, 2007
80
0
0
United States
Mar 22, 2007
#18
  • Mar 22, 2007
  • #18
I have the full length Maximum Motorsports, the quality and fit was great. I used a gas shieled welder to make the welds look as smooth as possible. I don't have a lift but I used some big blocks of wood to get all 4 tires off the ground by 2.5 feet. Just enough room to work and to load the suspension evenly. Weld and paint and you're done. Car tracks very straight and feels a lot stronger.
 

GToddyT5

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
553
0
16
Hamilton, NJ
Mar 23, 2007
#19
  • Mar 23, 2007
  • #19
I got mine on a few weeks ago and didn't notice a huge difference.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Mar 23, 2007
#20
  • Mar 23, 2007
  • #20
99gtsal said:
You don't necessarily need to go with full length SFC's.
Click to expand...
Yes, you do.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
808
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
How to Route Subframe-Style Intermediate Brake Line?
  • cnorman31
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
87
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 29, 2025
cnorman31
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
854
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
176
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
103
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?