• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Superchargers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick85
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
B

bryannathan1

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
3
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#41
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #41
It was Town & Country Ford in Bessemer, AL. The sales person showed me a F150 that they had just done this to. I am still skeptical and wanted to see if anyone else knew anything about this. I was getting ready to give the GTO the nod, but now I am liking this Roush supercharger option.
 

crash

Founding Member
Aug 12, 1999
337
0
0
Dallas, Tulsa
Jun 26, 2005
#42
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #42
sThanks for the information Sal.

Regarding the merger debate, it is somewhat irrelevant, since Art Whipple is the exclusive US distributor. Same situation with the Eaton. Jerry Magnuson has exclusive rights to sell Eaton blowers. This means supplying aftermarket AND the OEM. Both companies are sitting pretty right about now... LOL!

A couple of side notes, just a little off topic...

First-

While the GT-500 was slated to have the SCREW blower installed, Lysholm CANNOT keep up with production, so it will get an Eaton 122. The GT will still use the Lysholm (There WERE enough produced to cover the limted production run on the GT, but not the Shelby GT 500 (An SVT backed project).

Second- A few more Procharger installations are underway (Including mine). One more was completed today. Also, two more Procharged '05s have documented 11.60s to 11.70s in the latest magazines.

I just got off the phone with Ted (He owns a Yellow, NOW Procharged 05 GT), and he just sent me video of his Procharger installed. I thought I would imbed the vid in my Project page until I can get HIS site built (Just for your viewing enjoyment).

I am still waiting on images from him as well as a project name; He will have his own site which will mirror mine...

You can find the video here... Once I get my Procharger installed I will replace this one with my video, and move this file to Ted's site. Once the page is completely downloaded, wave your cursor over the image to start the video.

Turn up the volume... As teh page loads, you will hear a sound clip of my Procharged F-150. This will cycle once and will not replay.

Scroll down to the Procharger Racing logo and the image of the Procharger. The video is there.

This one sounds WICKED.
http://www.trixtersracing.com/project05.htm
 
N

Nick85

Banned
May 28, 2005
99
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#43
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #43
That Procharger does looks sweet....but 70 percent increase seems risky. Surely the engine would be over-stressed in everyday use....
 

crash

Founding Member
Aug 12, 1999
337
0
0
Dallas, Tulsa
Jun 26, 2005
#44
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #44
Nope. They have already thrashed on it. Fatalaties included TWO clutches, a 3rd gear blocker, and a howl in the rear diff.

SO, be SURE you don't abuse it. Let the boost do the work!

BTW- 540 is at the crank. 450 to the wheels...

No matter though... 11.60s @ 120, backed up by another car at 11.70. Both with stock suspension, stock wheels, and drag radials (Latest 5.0 Mustang and Superfords MAG).
 
W

Wsmatau

Member
Nov 30, 2004
93
0
6
Jun 26, 2005
#45
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #45
Crash, Any new info on the whipple yet?
 
N

Nick85

Banned
May 28, 2005
99
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#46
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #46
crash said:
Nope. They have already thrashed on it. Fatalaties included TWO clutches, a 3rd gear blocker, and a howl in the rear diff.

SO, be SURE you don't abuse it. Let the boost do the work!

BTW- 540 is at the crank. 450 to the wheels...

No matter though... 11.60s @ 120, backed up by another car at 11.70. Both with stock suspension, stock wheels, and drag radials (Latest 5.0 Mustang and Superfords MAG).
Click to expand...

Well I'll defnitely consider it But if that dealer in Alabama is telling the truth it's going to take a lot of convincing to turn down a warranty.
 

Power Surge

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,516
4
38
Palm Coast, FL
Jun 26, 2005
#47
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #47
Nick, the Roush kit uses an Eaton 112 style blower (like a Lightning or 03 Cobra). Out of all the available blower kits, this kit would make the least power. I'm sure it's probably in the area of 4500-6500 dollar, as the Roush kits are pricey.

As for the warranty with a Roush blower, FORD will look at it the same as any other blower. It's the dealer that will choose whether or not to handle the warranty issues. Some Roush dealers are telling customers they will honor the Ford powertrain warranty on a vehicle that the dealer themselves installed the blower kit on.
 
B

bryannathan1

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
3
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#48
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #48
Thanks CobraIILover for the info. Does +120 HP sound realistic with the Roush (Eaton 112) blower? You mentioned that it would generate the least additional power, does that also mean that it might be the "gentlest" on the factory engine and drivetrain and possibly avoid complications (failures)? If it is true, I think I can live with 420 HP...as long as I don't get beat by any GTO's or Charger SRT-8s.

Bryan
 

Power Surge

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,516
4
38
Palm Coast, FL
Jun 26, 2005
#49
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #49
bryannathan1 said:
Thanks CobraIILover for the info. Does +120 HP sound realistic with the Roush (Eaton 112) blower? You mentioned that it would generate the least additional power, does that also mean that it might be the "gentlest" on the factory engine and drivetrain and possibly avoid complications (failures)? If it is true, I think I can live with 420 HP...as long as I don't get beat by any GTO's or Charger SRT-8s.

Bryan
Click to expand...

It would be a good blower for a street driven car that wasn't going to see much racing use. I don't know if I'd go with 420hp, I'd have to see that on my dyno to believe it. Just for referance, the 99-04 2V Saleen with that same blower only puts about 320 to the wheels. The 3V motor has more hp potential, but I'd be surprised if a Roush powered 3V made more than 360 or so at the wheels. IMO, I'd rather spend the money on a more powerful blower setup. Even if you don't plan to use it to it's full potential, at least you'd HAVE the extra power on tap if you change your mind later.
 
N

Nick85

Banned
May 28, 2005
99
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#50
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #50
Thanks CobraLover

I grabbed a poll from another site...looks like Procharger gets the top vote.

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30791


Which would be safer a Saleen or Procharger?
 

Power Surge

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,516
4
38
Palm Coast, FL
Jun 26, 2005
#51
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #51
Nick85 said:
Thanks CobraLover

I grabbed a poll from another site...looks like Procharger gets the top vote.

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30791


Which would be safer a Saleen or Procharger?
Click to expand...

Yeah, the Procharger is probably one of the most powerful setups right now. I've run them on several of my vehicles. The only think I don't like about their kits is the parts are kinda cheezy (like hardware, couplers, ducting, etc) compared to other brands.

As far as "safety", I'd say the Saleen kit gets the vote over the ATI. The positive displacement blower has a much broader powerband and doesn't require the high rpms centrifugals need to make hp. Plus it's a much more "factory" kit and look. That's what drew me to it, I like parts that look like they are supposed to be there. Factory cars don't come with centrifugal blowers.
 
N

Nick85

Banned
May 28, 2005
99
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#52
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #52
If you haven't seen it already good article on the Vortech...

http://motortrend.com/features/performance/112_0505_tunertest/index.html

0-60 4.6 seconds!! I'm sure the other's have similar numbers if not better....we are going to own the road.


The Saleen does seem more intelligent...and is defintely discreet. Might stick with that myself.
 

PolkThug

Member
Nov 7, 2004
130
0
16
Somewhere voiding my warranty!
Jun 26, 2005
#53
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #53
Lysholm/Opcon info:
http://www.opcon.se/index.asp?sPage=1&langID=2&cID=14

Got to see the 485RWHP Vortech charged '05 doing a burnout last night, at Fuel, in KC.
 

PolkThug

Member
Nov 7, 2004
130
0
16
Somewhere voiding my warranty!
Jun 26, 2005
#54
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #54
Here's a pic of the car I mentioned above at Fuel.
 

Attachments

  • fuelburnout.webp
    8.6 KB · Views: 202

kpribble@terrib

Member
Apr 3, 2005
63
0
6
Jun 27, 2005
#55
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #55
CobraIILover said:
Yeah, the Procharger is probably one of the most powerful setups right now. I've run them on several of my vehicles. The only think I don't like about their kits is the parts are kinda cheezy (like hardware, couplers, ducting, etc) compared to other brands.

As far as "safety", I'd say the Saleen kit gets the vote over the ATI. The positive displacement blower has a much broader powerband and doesn't require the high rpms centrifugals need to make hp. Plus it's a much more "factory" kit and look. That's what drew me to it, I like parts that look like they are supposed to be there. Factory cars don't come with centrifugal blowers.
Click to expand...

I would have to agree - the saleen is not making as big of numbers as the procharger in most of the tests but it is only making 1/2 the boost (and 1/2 the stress)
 
O

OWENMUSTANG

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
23
0
0
Jun 27, 2005
#56
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #56
there is no way i'm going to put some noisy ass blower on my brand new car!
(pro charger) sounds like it's munching nuts and bolts!
some may think it sounds cool but, i do not. so, it looks like a whipple/saleen/kb blower for me........
 
N

Nolyaw

Banned
Jun 9, 2005
99
0
0
Hebron KY basically cincinnati OH
Jun 27, 2005
#57
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #57
crash said:
Nope. They have already thrashed on it. Fatalaties included TWO clutches, a 3rd gear blocker, and a howl in the rear diff.

SO, be SURE you don't abuse it. Let the boost do the work!

BTW- 540 is at the crank. 450 to the wheels...

No matter though... 11.60s @ 120, backed up by another car at 11.70. Both with stock suspension, stock wheels, and drag radials (Latest 5.0 Mustang and Superfords MAG).
Click to expand...
That car in the MMFF mag was the red one, Willy Diaz's car. He had 4.10's, winkle wall slicks,and an off-road h-pipe. That was his best run out of about ten, and it was also with a HD clutch.
 
N

Nolyaw

Banned
Jun 9, 2005
99
0
0
Hebron KY basically cincinnati OH
Jun 27, 2005
#58
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #58
OWENMUSTANG said:
there is no way i'm going to put some noisy ass blower on my brand new car!
(pro charger) sounds like it's munching nuts and bolts!
some may think it sounds cool but, i do not. so, it looks like a whipple/saleen/kb blower for me........
Click to expand...
Not so. They use the P1sc-1 on the new GT. This is the queitest centrifugal blower on any manufacturer. It has a SLIGHT whine at idle. Mostly what you hear is the blowoff valve. Inside the car NO noise is evident, except when you let off the gas and go into a vaccuum, and the blowoff valve opens. And that DOES sound cool. Unmistakeable.....
 

SixFivePony

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2001
248
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jun 27, 2005
#59
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #59
crash said:
sThanks for the information Sal.



I just got off the phone with Ted (He owns a Yellow, NOW Procharged 05 GT), and he just sent me video of his Procharger installed.

I am still waiting on images from him as well as a project name; He will have his own site which will mirror mine...

This one sounds WICKED.
http://www.trixtersracing.com/project05.htm
Click to expand...

Hey, I helped install Ted's ATI!

Was very impressed with the install, aside from the cheesy band clamps they used... From my Turbo-4 banger days, the clamps they used (the normal ones you see every day) don't hold boost well, but 9psi should be no biggie... maybe.

The more serious T-bar style clamps are far superior.

That said, I'm interested too see what you end up doing, crash. The recent article on the KB made the positive displacement blowers look nice... Your comments make Whipple seem a better choice than KB... which would be better, Whipple or ATI?
 
L

lostsoul

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
244
0
0
Jun 27, 2005
#60
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #60
mike is that you?? hahah.. I told Al a few hours ago to tell you thanks for the help. haha.. I went home that night to find out that the police towed my car while I was gone just because they decided to have a paraid there and gave less then 24 hours notice!!! Al had to drive me to the tow shop and pay 250 for my car and ALSO the police were nic enough to give me a parking ticket!!.. My car was in front of my apartment!!.. A@@es.

==OWENMUSTANG==
ITs louder because I left off the little filter over the blow off valve > .. there is a little grinding gringin noise but from what I heard that will go away soon.. I only have 100 miles on it and that noise is gone after 1300 rpm and you cant hear it with the hood down. I'm happy with it and once its tuned and ready It will be better. I'm just lucky to have peoeple like Crash and mike help me.. Crash called me and babied me through everything.. hahaa.. I took good pics though ;-)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
696
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
556
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
998
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
738
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
Wheel backspacing
  • Brad Hanks
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
526
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 25, 2025
Brad Hanks
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?