svttech76 *OFFICIAL* 09 fantasy football league thread
- Thread starter Mike97gt
- Start date
Bluffers is projected to win by 16 points over me today. I wouldn't count on that. I dont agree w/ the WR comparison. They have Isaac Bruce w/ an edge of 13pts VS Stucky's 3 Pts. Stucky scored more points then Bruce last week and St.Louis sucks anyway and I think hes an old washed up receiver to begin with. Stucky is going against a not yet gelled Patriots defense. Also bluffers defense will be w/ out Urlacher. I would consider an even match up between P.Crayton and R.Moss but they have Moss at an advantage even though Crayton scored more points on week 1.
Either way MY prediction is a win from me by 15 points.
Either way MY prediction is a win from me by 15 points.
Bluffing024
Active Member
Umm, Bruce doesn't play for the Rams first of all. Second, Moss is clearly a better fantasy option than Crayton...
good catch, so used to him playing for the rams it just comes out that way.
As far as Moss being a better fantasy option then Crayton, perhaps over all Im just not counting on it this week. Crayton did score more points then Moss last week. Moss is often used as a decoy to open it up for the tons of other weapons brady has to throw to.
I see Crayton as being the #1 receiver for Romo, well maybe a tie w/ Williams but Moss is not the #1 for Brady. That is clearly Welker.
But as the swami says....This is why they play the game.
As far as Moss being a better fantasy option then Crayton, perhaps over all Im just not counting on it this week. Crayton did score more points then Moss last week. Moss is often used as a decoy to open it up for the tons of other weapons brady has to throw to.
I see Crayton as being the #1 receiver for Romo, well maybe a tie w/ Williams but Moss is not the #1 for Brady. That is clearly Welker.
But as the swami says....This is why they play the game.
Bluffing024
Active Member
You have that all kinds of backwards. Moss is the Patriots #1 and Crayton is NOT the Cowboys #1. No question you would rather have Moss than Crayton.
Moss of 07 yes and I did have him then.
Both Moss and welker had 12 catch's last week. Moss had more yards b/c Welker is often in the middle w/ a lot more traffic. Neither one had a TD
Witten had 5 catches for 71 yards
Williams had 3 for 86
Crayton had 4 for 135
Granted this is only week 1 and a lot can change but Id be hard pressed to say that Crayton is not a #1 or tied for #1 Receiver for Romo
Bluffing024
Active Member
There, you just said it yourself. Welker isn't as good of an option because he won't catch as many yards or touchdowns as Moss. I don't get what you are arguing here?
Im not arguing moss/Welker Im talking about Crayton/Moss. I was using welker as an example against moss b/c he caught just as many passe's just sa I used Cryton as an example against Whitten/Williams.
The point Im trying to make is that Crayton is as much of a #1 option as much as moss is. You said Crayton is definitely not a #1 receiver as compared to moss and I said I disagree
Bluffing024
Active Member
Crayton is the #2 in Dallas. Roy Williams is #1, but even if they are tied it means they are sharing catches. Welker is out this week which makes Moss a much better option. You don't play Fantasy by how they scored last week, you go by match ups, who's injured ect.
Plus who has a better QB throwing to them and which team throws more? Answers: Brady and the Patriots.
Im only comparing last week b/c that's all we have to go on at this point. Much of it is about match up but tell me now many people cared about match up's w/ Moss back in 07. You think no one started him when they played the Ravens/Steelers b/c they had a tough defense?
Bluffing024
Active Member
You're going off track. I never said you should sit Moss. I said Moss is a much better option than Crayton. End of story.
Now your going off track, I never said Crayton was a better option then Moss. I was making the point that as moss is a #1 receiver so is Crayton.
last weeks stats back that up
And I would start a player based on how they have been playing. Not just based on a match up b/c they are playing a tough defense. If a player is on a 2-3 game hot streak why sit them regardless of the match up?
Similar threads
Progress Thread
Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
Progress Thread
mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
