• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Swapped MAF today.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1Fine89stang
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

1Fine89stang

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
87
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#1
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #1
Today i put on my cold air intake and while i had it out i decided to try out the cobra maf i had . The numbers on my stock maf were F1ZF-12B579-AA and AFH55-03B . the numbers on the cobra one that i put on are F1SF-12B579-AA and AFH70-02 . I got mixed reviews from the stang net community about how it would work , so i decided to try it out , to my knowledge , which included taking it around the block , it ran fine and had a signifigant power gain , and no check engine light came on. Before i drive around on it too much i would like to know if i can expect any long term issues from running it . If it helps to know , the rest of my engine is stock, and i have an aod transmission.
 
T

TENGRAM

New Member
Mar 18, 2006
143
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#2
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #2
good info, keep us updated
 
1

1Fine89stang

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
87
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#3
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #3
Does anyone know if it will do anything harmfull to my engine if i keep the cobra maf on ? Im really out of my league on this , i know that it works now , but i dont know if my engine will blow up in a week from using it , lol. Any info is welcome!
 
P

postalbunny

Member
Oct 26, 2005
118
0
17
Dec 10, 2006
#4
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #4
the cobra maf from what I read has the same curve as a normal one, and the cobra computer is what was "calibrated" to 24lbs injectors. So it should work just liek a 94/95 maf.
 
1

1Fine89stang

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
87
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#5
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #5
does that mean its safe on my 89?
 
1

1Fine89stang

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
87
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#6
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #6
Anyone?
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Dec 10, 2006
#7
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #7
As long as you have 24 pound injectors running with it you should be fine.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Dec 10, 2006
#8
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #8
Whoa...

I should have put my hip waders on before coming into this thread. hehehe

The transfer functions for a Cobra meter vs. a stock GT meter are DIFFERENT. Swapping over to 24 lb injectors does NOT make everything ok.

So you drove around the block and noticed a power difference. I'll have to chock that particular anomaly up to wishful thinking.

The trouble is that the higher you go in CFM the further away you get in the differences between your OEM GT meter and the Cobra meter. So to answer your question.... YES you're running a risk of running lean and causing harm to your motor.

At 4.4 volts, the Cobra meter is measuring 425.3 CFM but your stock A9x computer only sending enough fuel to supply 347.4 CFM. The difference is outside of the EEC's ability to adapt. The higher you get in the RPM range, the less it will be able to compensate and the leaner you will run. Lets also not forget that 02 sensor input is not read at WOT. So whatever the adaptive control has interpolated from the lower end of the RPM range is what it will add in fuel up top.

This is not a good thing since the fuel curves are further apart at the top than they are at the bottom.

Take a look at the charts here:
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/93cobra-maf-vs-stock-gt-maf.html

If you insist on running this meter with 24 lb injectors then either GET Cobra computer or have your A9x EEC tuned with the proper transfer curve.

The way you have it configured now, you're asking for trouble.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 11, 2006
#9
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #9
I think the 93 Cobra MAF tube was a 70mm, correct?

If this is right then an A9* computer should be able to run a 93 Cobra MAF
IF
a MAS is used from a 94-95 Mustang and stock 19Lb injectors are used.

This would then be the same conversion as using a 94-95 70mm MAF on a Fox computer with 19Lb injectors, which is pretty much a direct replacement.
At least as far as the accuracy of the MAF/MAS is concerned.

jason
 

stangjunkie

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
381
0
0
Dec 11, 2006
#10
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #10
did you even read daggars post?? it makes alot of sense to me.... so you would need the cobra MAF 24's and the cobra computer. that would solve your problem. and as for the HP gain that would make sense simply because you opened up the breathing hole for the motor.
 
1

1Fine89stang

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
87
0
0
Dec 12, 2006
#11
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #11
Thanks a lot guys, ill swap back the stock MAF today and then hit the junk yard looking for a cobra!
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
Dec 12, 2006
#12
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #12
I just recently purchased a 70mm MAF. It said it was calibrated for 19# injectors. Is this wrong then? I think the guy said it was off a Cobra. I have been driving it like it is and it is getting horrible gas mileage. Could this be the reason? I used to get 320 on a tank now I am getting 220.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 12, 2006
#13
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #13
onebad7up said:
I just recently purchased a 70mm MAF. It said it was calibrated for 19# injectors. Is this wrong then? I think the guy said it was off a Cobra. I have been driving it like it is and it is getting horrible gas mileage. Could this be the reason? I used to get 320 on a tank now I am getting 220.
Click to expand...

Assuming you have a 70mm Ford MAF tube...

Then the 19# calibration is FALSE.
Ford did it's calibrating for the MAF and injectors in the computer.

Depending on what sensor you have in the MAF tube, it will work.

You must use the 94-95 Mustang sensor.
And this will only work if you use 19Lb injectors.

To get a better handle on your economy issue, pull your codes.
There is a link in my sig if you don't have a scanner.
This should give you something to go on,
but definately check the part number on the MAS.

jason
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Dec 12, 2006
#14
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #14
stangjunkie said:
did you even read daggars post?? it makes alot of sense to me.... so you would need the cobra MAF 24's and the cobra computer. that would solve your problem. and as for the HP gain that would make sense simply because you opened up the breathing hole for the motor.
Click to expand...

He's referring to taking the electronics out of a 94/95 sensor and installing them into a Cobra meter housing.

Should work... I don't see why it wouldn't.
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
Dec 15, 2006
#15
  • Dec 15, 2006
  • #15
I do have the 70mm housing that the sensor bolts into. So I can only run this setup inf I have the 94-95 5.0 mass air sensor? I will try and get the number off of it so I can see what it is.
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
Dec 29, 2006
#16
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #16
I got the numbers and they are F3VF-12B579-AA. Google shows this as a 80mm MAF from a Lincoln Mark VIII. Is this true? The guy I bought it off of said it was a 70mm off of a cobra calibrated for 19# injectors. Should I just sell this and put my stock 55mm on?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 30, 2006
#17
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #17
onebad7up said:
I got the numbers and they are F3VF-12B579-AA. Google shows this as a 80mm MAF from a Lincoln Mark VIII. Is this true? The guy I bought it off of said it was a 70mm off of a cobra calibrated for 19# injectors. Should I just sell this and put my stock 55mm on?
Click to expand...

It doesn't look like the F3VF sensor will work.
The following site
http://www.rothfam.com/svo/reference/maf_part_number.html
shows that the F3VF uses a a rectangular plug, as well as being from a 80mm MAF.

I would keep looking for the F2VF.

Keep us posted, I'd like to hear how things pan out.
jason
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
Dec 30, 2006
#18
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #18
Thanks for the info. I think I will just sell this one. That website shows that it is calibrated for 24# injectors. HOpefully someone will need this.

I guess I will just go back to the stock MAF. My gas mileage has been killed by this. I used to get 360 miles per tank but these last couple since the swap have been 210.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Dec 30, 2006
#19
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #19
onebad7up said:
Thanks for the info. I think I will just sell this one. That website shows that it is calibrated for 24# injectors. HOpefully someone will need this.

.
Click to expand...
It think it it important to point out...

That sensor is not calibrated to an injector size. The Ford sensors are calibrated to work with a specific computer and MAF housing.
The Ford computer contains a setting for the MAF housing/MAS sensor combination.
There is another separate setting for the injector size.

You were told incorrectly that the sensor was 'calibrated', but that doesn't mean you should pass on false information when you sell the sensor.

good luck and keep us posted,
jason
 

onebad7up

Member
Jun 21, 2004
97
0
6
Nashville
Dec 30, 2006
#20
  • Dec 30, 2006
  • #20
The sensor came with the housing. It looks like my stock housing, just bigger.

If MAF sensors are not calibrated to a particular injector, why do people sell them like that? i.e. 70mm calibrated for 19# injectors.

Can my MAF be used on a Mustang? If so, what years?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
947
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
293
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
  • Locked
Digital Tuning A9l issue or something else
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
297
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fuel Looking for a little guidance
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
368
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 12, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
258
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?