• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

T-5 conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vince
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Oct 5, 2005
#21
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #21
Realmongo said:
You can change the weight of a 50 oz flywheel to a 28 oz?
Click to expand...

Easily, if you have the balancing equipment. A shop charges something like $75 to do it, I think.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Oct 5, 2005
#22
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #22
I just changed my '84 over to a 10.5" clutch and have no use for the original 10" flywheel.
 

Vince

Vince the Fabricator
Founding Member
Feb 22, 2000
623
0
16
Vancouver, Canada
Oct 10, 2005
#23
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #23
Blue Thunder said:
...And the *WEIGHT* of that stock II flywheel. That thing weighs something like 60 pounds by itself. If I recall correctly, I weighed the flywheel and clutch assembly and the total was 72 pounds. If you ever want to get back at someone, just drop a II flywheel on his foot...
Click to expand...
Out of curiosity I weighed my V8 flywheel and it came in at 40 pounds. Still heavy, but not 60 lbs. I did a little searching and I think the earlier 302 cast-iron flywheels were around 34 lbs. I bet Ford had to make the Mustang II flywheel heavier to get the same rotational inertia with a smaller diameter.
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Oct 14, 2005
#24
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #24
Vince said:
Out of curiosity I weighed my V8 flywheel and it came in at 40 pounds. Still heavy, but not 60 lbs. I did a little searching and I think the earlier 302 cast-iron flywheels were around 34 lbs. I bet Ford had to make the Mustang II flywheel heavier to get the same rotational inertia with a smaller diameter.
Click to expand...

I think I still have mine in storage someplace, I'll see if I can dig it out and check the weight. It makes sense that a smaller dia. wheel needs more weight, too. On the same token, if you made a custom alum. flywheel that small, the rotational mass would be extremely low.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
337
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
384
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
214
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
960
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?