• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

T5 Conversion Issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter meweehaa
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2016

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 15, 2016
#1
  • Aug 15, 2016
  • #1
I have a 69 coupe with a 80's 302, '93 T5 and a hydraulic clutch that was bought through John's Mustangs and Classics in San Diego years ago. I am using a bell housing from the same era as the T5. I have an issue where the rod from the slave cylinder hits the bell housing. I still have room for clutch pedal travel but the rod prevents that and in turn doesn't let me get enough travel on the clutch to shift without grinding the gears. I would appreciate it if anyone would be able to help me figure this out.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 16, 2016
#2
  • Aug 16, 2016
  • #2
Can you post pics of your setup?
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 16, 2016
#3
  • Aug 16, 2016
  • #3
I will do my best to get that done tonight. Thank you for asking.
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 16, 2016
#4
  • Aug 16, 2016
  • #4
Hopefully these will help.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    233 KB · Views: 213
  • image.webp
    232.5 KB · Views: 213
  • image.webp
    229.4 KB · Views: 217
  • image.webp
    252.6 KB · Views: 212

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 17, 2016
#5
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #5
Im assuming the last picture is where the problem is? Where the rod settles into the fork?
Three things come to mind.
First are you sure you have the correct throw out bearing and its installed correctly?
Second possibly the stud that the other end of the fork pivots on is the wrong one (too short).
Last what era is the clutch fork? Maybe the wrong one
Any one of these could cause too much gap between your throw out bearing and pressure plate fingers which would cause you to run out of travel before your disengage the clutch completely.
Maybe pull your slave cyl off and see how much travel you have on the fork before the throw out bearing hits the pressure plate.
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 17, 2016
#6
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #6
I'll try that tonight as well. What is the correct distance of travel I should have on the fork from most aft position where it strikes the bell up to it hitting the pressure plate? Once I determine my distance is incorrect how do I determine which piece or pieces are the incorrect part? And thank you for the assistance.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 17, 2016
#7
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #7
If the stud and fork came with the bell housing I would guess they are correct because you want them to match the era bell housing you are using and the same for the throw-out bearing.
Don't know that there is a "correct" distance of travel but if that last pic is with the clutch resting with nobody pushing on the clutch pedal then it looks like it is too far forward. Resting it should be closer to the rear than to the front. I would say if you unbolt the slave cyl and move the fork you should get 1/2 to 1 inch free travel? Generally you would get about a 1/2 inch or so pedal travel inside the car before you feel the pressure.
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 17, 2016
#8
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #8
I bought the bell second hand (93 era) and the tranny new. I believe I bought the fork and stud for the bell but it is possible I ended up with an incorrect part. The throwout bearing falls into the same category. That pic was of the pedal at rest, yes.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 17, 2016
#9
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #9
Its possible that your stud is adjustable? There is probably a nut on it to adjust and lock in place. Im not completely familiar with that setup. Ill have to do some research.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 17, 2016
#10
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #10

Left and center are non adjustable type


Adjustable type
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 17, 2016
#11
  • Aug 17, 2016
  • #11
I was fooling with it tonight and took out some of the preload to where I had some play in the clutch pedal and cut 3/8" off the end of the slave cylinder rod. Then bled the clutch again. That 3/8" seems to have made quite the difference in addition to bleeding it. I drove it to test it and I have way lot travel in the clutch and no grinding in first or reverse from a start. It isn't a final test but that absolutely did seem to help. This weekend I will have some more time to fool with it but I at least feel like I made some progress. I did not get up in there to see what type stud I have installed just yet but I will.
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 18, 2016
#12
  • Aug 18, 2016
  • #12
I'll get up under it again tomorrow night and see if I can get a flashlight past the headers to see if I can see the stud but I'm fairly certain I'll need to pull the tranny out to see anything.
 

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Aug 18, 2016
#13
  • Aug 18, 2016
  • #13
Yeah I doubt you'll be able to see it but if you've gotten it to work then I'd leave it alone. Have you driven it and test shifted since you bled it and cut the shaft?
Also that bell housing looks like it is setup for a cable driven clutch so you may have to just work with what you've got if it works.
 

meweehaa

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2000
202
0
16
Northeast PA
Aug 18, 2016
#14
  • Aug 18, 2016
  • #14
The bell is absolutely a cable clutch bell from a fox body.

Yes I did a test drive in it. But the real shift issue I had was just 1st or reverse from neutral at a stop. It was great to get it out again.
 
Last edited: Aug 18, 2016
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
85 Capri 5.0 transmission rattle
  • Mamaclean
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
104
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2026
Mamaclean
M
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
239
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
159
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
519
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Drivetrain Downshifting from 3rd to 2nd issue
  • Scott_S
  • Apr 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
383
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 9, 2026
Scott_S
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?