• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Tfs R Series Craigslist Find

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reddevil91
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2018
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Feb 9, 2018
#21
  • Feb 9, 2018
  • #21
if it were me looking to spice up a street car a little without getting caught up in a full expensive build.. I'd just pickup a used vortech Atrim or Strim, pulley upgrade, install a walbro 255 fuel pump, 42 or 60lb injectors, MAF of choice, holley systemax2 intake or keep the gt40 and find a reputable tuner to tune the car.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Reddevil91

15 Year Member
Mar 3, 2010
1,630
773
163
Feb 9, 2018
#22
  • Feb 9, 2018
  • #22
Boostedpimp said:
if it were me looking to spice up a street car a little without getting caught up in a full expensive build.. I'd just pickup a used vortech Atrim or Strim, pulley upgrade, install a walbro 255 fuel pump, 42 or 60lb injectors, MAF of choice, holley systemax2 intake or keep the gt40 and find a reputable tuner to tune the car.
Click to expand...
Well what would be different from the V3 si I’m looking to get vs the A or S trims you are talking about? With the V3 I could still do the pulley changes to get more boost as well right? Was planning on using 47lb but think I may go 60lb, with pro m 80 and get the Aeromotive 340 fuel pump, aero fuel pressure regulator, and idk if I should swap out to better fuel rails or if the stock ones are ok? If i should upgrade what are some that I should look at? Also are fuel pressure gauges needed?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Feb 9, 2018
#23
  • Feb 9, 2018
  • #23
Fuel rails and lines are good to around 500rwhp which is arguably above what the stock engine block will take(for any long term use). The other parts you mention are good(60# inj are what I’d use).
 
Reactions: Reddevil91 and Hoytster

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Feb 10, 2018
#24
  • Feb 10, 2018
  • #24
Reddevil91 said:
Well what would be different from the V3 si I’m looking to get vs the A or S trims you are talking about? With the V3 I could still do the pulley changes to get more boost as well right? Was planning on using 47lb but think I may go 60lb, with pro m 80 and get the Aeromotive 340 fuel pump, aero fuel pressure regulator, and idk if I should swap out to better fuel rails or if the stock ones are ok? If i should upgrade what are some that I should look at? Also are fuel pressure gauges needed?
Click to expand...

I mentioned the S or A trim head units because they are older and can be had at a much cheaper price but very efficient. Of course you could with a new v3 si and swap pulley for more power later one. Same goes for a used S or A trim kit. generally if you ship your head unit back to vortech for rebuild they rebuild to the v3 spec now.

I had issues getting the 42lb injectors dialed in and jumped to 60's and it was piece of cake. So based on that reason my opinion would be to skip to the 60's if you don't already have injectors plus you'll have more room to grow with them later on. The 340 pump is good or you could get by with a walbro 255/boost a pump combo and no need to upgrade the fuel rails and lines with your power levels. You will need an adjustable fuel pressure regular, aeromotive's is nice, holley's is dog. No gauges are mandatory but I would suggest a boost gauge and a fuel pressure gauge for piece of mine.
 
Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
Reactions: Reddevil91

Reddevil91

15 Year Member
Mar 3, 2010
1,630
773
163
Feb 12, 2018
#25
  • Feb 12, 2018
  • #25
Boostedpimp said:
I mentioned the S or A trim head units because they are older and can be had at a much cheaper price but very efficient. Of course you could with a new v3 si and swap pulley for more power later one. Same goes for a used S or A trim kit. generally if you ship your head unit back to vortech for rebuild they rebuild to the v3 spec now.

I had issues getting the 42lb injectors dialed in and jumped to 60's and it was piece of cake. So based on that reason my opinion would be to skip to the 60's if you don't already have injectors plus you'll have more room to grow with them later on. The 340 pump is good but you could get by with just a walbro 255 and no need to upgrade the fuel rails and lines with your power levels. You will need an adjustable fuel pressure regular, aeromotive's is nice, holley's is dog. No gauges are mandatory but I would suggest a boost gauge and a fuel pressure gauge for piece of mine.
Click to expand...
Awesome, Are there any other brands you’d suggest or going with Aeromotive a good move.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
288
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?