Th e performer rpm or the performer rpm2

[rob302]

this is on and 86 tbird guys here are my engine mods
afr 165 heads
e303 cam
explorer intake lower ported by tmoss
aod wide ratio kit with 3200 stall 3.73 gear
car made 297 rwhp and 326.5 rwtq

OK so which itake will make more power on my car the rpm 2 seems to hold even with the performer rpm on torque and make more power any input is welcome thanks guys

Robert

 

[5spd GT]

Go with the regular Performer (or no more than the RPM)...

 

[85_SS_302_Coupe]

That review in one of the 'stang mags was saying that the 2 didnt give up hardly anything to the original, and that it bested it in HP and TQ...i'd probably go with the 2 if i were you....but i have yet to even see one in the real world on anyone's car so that might say something.

 

[runningmole]

Old style RPM on my car

 

[NoSloCoupes]

RPM. No need for the II with that combo.



Not that I've got any experiance between the two of them.


Jason

 

[montanagrog]

We have the RPMII on my son's 89. It woke the top end up and with the T5 & 3.73s - 7 grand comes quick. Watch the alignment on the intake to head ports as some do not line up correctly. Check with their tech line before buying. Had the RPM on the old car and it worked great too, but not as well from 4500 up.

 

[rob302]

well whats your setup and did u lose any bottom end

 

[montanagrog]

306, e-cam, 1.6s, 70mm tb, 75 mas, 24#, FRRP 'x' heads, BBK cai & LT headers w/ off-road h-pipe. No loss at low end, and town driving is great.

 

[tmoss]

rob - any chance I could get you to post the Explorer dyno graph and then later the RPM dyno graph?

 

[rob302]

hey i dont know how to post pics by i can email u my dyno graph later today then once i get the rpm 2 on ill re dyno u think there is any gains in it
thanks

Robert