• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The 5.0 Mustang is Back!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRaburn
  • Start date Start date Dec 27, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jan 25, 2010
#21
  • Jan 25, 2010
  • #21
NikwoaC said:
2. It uses an ~11:1 compression ratio, so forget about slapping on a supercharger or turbocharger without going through the bottom end and replacing pistons. Might as well plan on buying new rods, too- this engine uses the same frail rods the new cars are known for.
Click to expand...

This engine certainly isn't going to respond to bolt-on mods like the old pushrod 5.0 'cause it's already near its full potential in N/A form, and as you rightly said it's unlikely that you'll be able to stroke it out for more displacement either.
The only easy route to more power would be to swap in forged pistons/rods and lower the CR to allow forced induction. The stock hypereutectic pistons have thin ring lands that'll break if there's detonation, and I wouldn't gamble on taking the stock powdered metal rods above 7000rpm or subjecting them to the higher cylinder pressures from a blower.
 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Jan 27, 2010
#22
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #22
Well the 2011 GT350 is a supercharged 5.0. I wonder if they rebuild the engine with lower compression or run the blower with the 11:1
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 27, 2010
#23
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #23
foxmustangman said:
Well the 2011 GT350 is a supercharged 5.0. I wonder if they rebuild the engine with lower compression or run the blower with the 11:1
Click to expand...

Where did you hear this?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 27, 2010
#24
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #24
OK, I just Googled it. The Motor Trend article I just read notes that the engine is still undergoing tuning and testing. I'd be willing to bet they are using different rods and pistons than what are in the N/A motor.

If they are already coming out with forced induction versions of this motor... Maybe there is some hope for it after all.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jan 27, 2010
#25
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #25
NikwoaC said:
I'd be willing to bet they are using different rods and pistons than what are in the N/A motor.
Click to expand...

Unless it's a low boost application (Ford Racing Whipple supercharger will be used), you can bet the farm that rods and pistons will be forged and the CR lowered.

 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Jan 27, 2010
#26
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #26
NikwoaC said:
If they are already coming out with forced induction versions of this motor... Maybe there is some hope for it after all.
Click to expand...

I'll take that Supercharged 5.0 for my fox
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 27, 2010
#27
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • #27
So I was reading up on the new 6 speed manual transmission, and according to 5.0 M & SF, its only rated to 375 ft-lb. I call because the Coyote in stock form is supposed to put out 390. Also, its manufactured in CHINA.

The more I learn about this car, the more I don't know what to think about it.
 

86turbo

Member
Apr 8, 2006
183
0
17
Feb 3, 2010
#28
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #28
First off, it pisses me off to see the copycat foxbody 5.0 emblem on the engine shroud. I think the variable valve timing tech is cool but I'm not getting too excited about the engine. An engine like this is loooong overdue but I don't like FORD trying to feed on the entire 5-oh thing. You guys think GM is sitting idle and not planning any sort of counter attack? I mean, look at the car FORD put the coyote engine in......seriously. IF this engine was factory in a "new edge" or older then I'd feel different about it. The mustang as a "pony car" died (again) with the s197 platform.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Feb 3, 2010
#29
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #29
I'd take the new Five-O in this any day:



 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,995
2,983
194
Middle of Maine
Feb 16, 2010
#30
  • Feb 16, 2010
  • #30
Here is my take on the new 5.0. When EFI was introduced in 86' everyone said "Performance is Dead!", We will NEVER be able to work on these things. When the SOHC and DOHC mod motors came out, the same old whine that performance mods for the average guy was not possible. Now we have the "new" 5.0. Given some time and good old American "can do" attitude, there is no reason in the world why we will not be modifying these new engines in no time. Believe me, I was a bit nervous the first time I swaped cams or heads on the 4.6, now it is a piece of cake. Will it be as mod friendly as the original 5.0? Not initially, remember the old 5.0 has almost 50 years of R&D and is like an old friend. Lets give the "new" friend a chance to show us what it's got. I bet in 10 years working on this "new 5.0" will also be a "piece of cake."
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
May 17, 2010
#31
  • May 17, 2010
  • #31
Reading more of the new info on the new motor with lots of numbers crunched together is like some serious bench racing. I will reserve my opinion til I see it go. Nice to hear about the whole 'twice the power of my old 5.0' thing-again, but we heard all these same stories when the 4.6 came out. What I know about it is this. It won't replace my 88, just like our Foxes didn't replace the old first or second gen Mustangs. I'm not blowing $30K+ on a toy car, I work for a living. My LX will be more than able to defend itself just like it always has, and for a whole lot less.
 
8

89drop

New Member
Aug 30, 2009
175
2
0
Oct 6, 2010
#32
  • Oct 6, 2010
  • #32
Bullitt95 said:
Does it matter? It's still 302ci but a modern all-aluminium version with DOHC, 4-valves per cylinder, variable valve timing, 412hp @ 6500rpm, 390lbft @ 4250rpm, and a 7000rpm redline.
Click to expand...

those are sexy #'s!
 
Q

quickfox91

New Member
Oct 26, 2010
1
0
0
Oct 26, 2010
#33
  • Oct 26, 2010
  • #33
86turbo said:
First off, it pisses me off to see the copycat foxbody 5.0 emblem on the engine shroud. I think the variable valve timing tech is cool but I'm not getting too excited about the engine. An engine like this is loooong overdue but I don't like FORD trying to feed on the entire 5-oh thing. You guys think GM is sitting idle and not planning any sort of counter attack? I mean, look at the car FORD put the coyote engine in......seriously. IF this engine was factory in a "new edge" or older then I'd feel different about it. The mustang as a "pony car" died (again) with the s197 platform.
Click to expand...

I'd be interested to see what the new 5.0 feels like.haven't taken a test drive in one yet.
 
A

ajenglish0347

New Member
Jan 9, 2011
9
0
1
Louisville, KY
Jan 17, 2011
#34
  • Jan 17, 2011
  • #34
It is about time the 5.0 is back into production, and I will have to say they did a good job not making it a pile of poop either.
 

Snake1

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2000
1,460
0
0
British Columbia
Feb 10, 2011
#35
  • Feb 10, 2011
  • #35
think I'll just keep my 88 5.0 H.O
 

tb9050lx

Member
Mar 7, 2004
155
3
19
ct
Mar 27, 2011
#36
  • Mar 27, 2011
  • #36
foxmustangman said:
Well the 2011 GT350 is a supercharged 5.0. I wonder if they rebuild the engine with lower compression or run the blower with the 11:1
Click to expand...

no need to lower the compression ! this engine has direct injection.the 11:1 with a blower is not an issue at all
 

tb9050lx

Member
Mar 7, 2004
155
3
19
ct
Mar 29, 2011
#37
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #37
Bullitt95 said:
Unless it's a low boost application (Ford Racing Whipple supercharger will be used), you can bet the farm that rods and pistons will be forged and the CR lowered.

Click to expand...

nope the direct injection ,is the reason high compression can be run without lowering the cr ratio.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
368
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
391
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 3:12 PM
General karthief
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
163
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
269
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
263
The Welcome Wagon Aug 18, 2026
josep4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?