• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

the 5.0 or newer 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstang01
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 25, 2007
#21
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #21
65fastback2+2 said:
1968 Coupe with a 302 ....best looking car and easiest maintenance EVER!
Click to expand...

.....till you need parts.
 
J

jefferz

Member
Oct 21, 2004
110
1
19
Spokane, WA
Jan 25, 2007
#22
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #22
I love both. I have both...but the fuel economy is nowhere near the same like someone else said. I am lucky to get 175-200 to a tank on my 95 and I get about 300-315 on my 02. But I have never cared about gas mileage. Both are fun as hell to drive. They are both V8 Mustangs and thats good enough for me. both get looks when I am driving down the road.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Jan 25, 2007
#23
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #23
Thanks for the replys. I think Im going to test drive one of each and see what one I like better. Im thinking a newer 4.6 is probably the better choice because this will be my only car (well, we have a 1989 suburban and a beater hyundai too, but whenever its not snowing ill most likely be driving the stang) I heard from a few places that the 4.6 gets significantly better mileage than the 5.0, and it kind of makes sense considering the 5.0 is dated to the 60s n 70s. Im assuming it also handles and brakes better, and when I get older forced induction might be a good route (I hear 4.6s like boost) Good opinions guys, keep it up if you have anything else for me
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 25, 2007
#24
  • Jan 25, 2007
  • #24
The 4.6 likes boost because of its low compression and its hatred to make naturally aspirated power, lol.

Alot of 5.0 guys go naturally aspirated because you can buy heads/cam/intake for less than a complete blower kit for those cars.

Either engine has its limits when it comes to boost though. Neither ones bottom end are the toughest things in the world.


But I suggest driving each one, hell, a few of each to tell the truth.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Jan 26, 2007
#25
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #25
also, im torn between auto or manual, manuals are alot more fun, but auto might be better for daily driving, and less to worry about as a newer driver.. I also hear fords autos are crap, but can that be fixed with a shift kit or is it the tranny itself?
 

poorcollegekid

Member
Mar 31, 2005
74
0
6
Mount Carmel, IL
Jan 26, 2007
#26
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #26
IMO, if you want a decently quick car that attracts the tail and sounds mean, go with the PI 4.6 (99-04). i would steer clear of 94-95 stangs all together. The 5.0's in the fox body's were much better for modding, also, the manual in the 94-95's is a t-5, not really gonna handle a lot of power, the t3650 isnt perfect, but its definitely better and cleaner feeling. id go 99-04, but my heart still lies with the 96-8 cobra when it comes to looks...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 26, 2007
#27
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #27
BurningRubber said:
The 4.6 likes boost because of its low compression and its hatred to make naturally aspirated power, lol.
Click to expand...

....joking aside, the compression between the two is actually about the same. The 4.6L SOHC is much more volumetrically efficient that the old 5.0L OHV was. The 4.6L engine has only 281ci to fill, where the 5.0L has to fill 302ci. Right off the bat, when you get two identical blowers spinning at the exact same RPM, the 4.6L has an easier time filling the smaller cylinders by comparison. Combine that with the fact that the aluminum heads (which will allow more timing because of their ability to more quickly remove heat from the combustion chamber) on the PI 4.6L are head over heels better flowing, with a more efficient combustion design than the old E7TE iron castings on the earlier OHV engines (PI castings actually rival some of the aftermarket 302 heads) and you'll see why they respond so well to forced induction.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 26, 2007
#28
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #28
I learned something new today.

And I cant stop staring at the bottom of your sig...
 
2

215what

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
154
0
0
NM
Jan 26, 2007
#29
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #29
I say 96-98 cobra, if your going to get a newer stang it whould cost the same as a 99+
And I have a 95 gt and it's slow. Thats why i bought a cobra 4v
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 26, 2007
#30
  • Jan 26, 2007
  • #30
Actually the 4R70W auto is pretty stout. Im gonna push it untill she goes out on me with the new power. Then a built auto.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Jan 27, 2007
#31
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #31
I really like the 96-98 cobras, but people are trying to get 15 grand for any of them under 100,000 miles... whats a realistic price for a mid mileage one? How about compared to a PI SOHC 4.6?
 
S

svtpower

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
257
0
0
Wisconsin
Jan 27, 2007
#32
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #32
get real

$15K for a 96-98 Cobra get real.

$9K-$10K would be a good price for those.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Jan 29, 2007
#33
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #33
9K is what Im thinking would be resonable too, but I cant find any for that kind of price
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 29, 2007
#34
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #34
Ive seen 96-98 Cobras going for 7-9k around my area, good shape.

A freind of mine picked up a Mystic in A+ shape for 9k.
 
2

215what

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
154
0
0
NM
Jan 29, 2007
#35
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #35
Paid 9k for mine got it at a dealer ship though. I think the 4v is so much better than a
2v.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Jan 29, 2007
#36
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #36
wow.. 9k for a cobra @ a dealership i wish i could find something like that around here
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
89 5.0 GT- Can tourqe boxes be worn out through regular use?
  • Sanchez_005150
  • Oct 26, 2021
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
620
The Welcome Wagon Oct 26, 2021
mikeynonos
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
Buy new 2011+ mustang vs supercharged fox / newedge ?
  • Trickflo
  • Jul 28, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 9, 2020
Mustang5L5
T
Nissan V8 Swapping a 1996 SN95 Mustang. Have I lost my mind?
  • TJ Rebuild
  • Feb 14, 2021
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2021
LILCBRA
S
For Sale 1993 Mustang LX 5.0 Reef Blue, Auto, Hatchback Stamford, CT
  • syl3ntforce
  • Apr 9, 2019
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
5K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 9, 2019
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?