• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The Black Pearl - Progress Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darkwriter77
  • Start date Start date Jul 5, 2008
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 13
Next
First Prev 2 of 13 Next Last

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Jul 7, 2008
#21
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #21
Loving the two tone dash
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 7, 2008
#22
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #22
1990Coupe said:
Are you actually going to keep this one for a while??!?!?!
Click to expand...

Yeah, probably. It's got project potential, and it's not a terribly expensive deal. Plus, it's going to have to sit and collect dust for awhile as I gather the necessary goodies, anyway.

LaserSVT said:
Loving the two tone dash
Click to expand...

I sense sarcasm here... I'm planning on either painting, swapping (it's cracked), or capping the dash. For right now, the sexy porno-red embroidered carpet that came on it is staying put.
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Jul 7, 2008
#23
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #23
The car is in great shape. You will love it when its running good and drivable.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Jul 7, 2008
#24
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #24
Yeah, I was being a asmart ass. Really though I like the car and would love to have a Fox project like that. But now I only have one day off a week and with the two cars I wash and wax now with the home cleaning I really dont have the time or cash for it
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,185
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Jul 7, 2008
#25
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #25
Somebody took the original wing off and put an 1986-later wing on there since it has the 3rd brakelight



Interesting how i notice stupid things like that
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#26
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #26
Mustang5L5 said:
Somebody took the original wing off and put an 1986-later wing on there since it has the 3rd brakelight



Interesting how i notice stupid things like that
Click to expand...

I notice stuff like that too. It doesn't even fit right.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 7, 2008
#27
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #27
Mustang5L5 said:
Somebody took the original wing off and put an 1986-later wing on there since it has the 3rd brakelight



Interesting how i notice stupid things like that
Click to expand...

Yeah. It's already a PITA, too, because there's a bunch of leaves and crap that've gathered under/inside it because the leading edge (toward the front) has about a 1/4 gap between itself and its mating surface, but the back is about flush with the decklid. Thus, I'm going to have to unbolt it, clean it, and either remount it with some kinda weatherstripping under there to close the gap, or install a different wing. I don't really care about the 3rd brake light, just so long as I don't get pulled over for it because some cop doesn't know they aren't required on '84 (or is it '85?) and older vehicles ... or I could just wire it up to actually work and fugeddaboutit.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,185
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Jul 7, 2008
#28
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #28
1986 was the first year they put it on the mustang.


i would leave it off...but then it doesn't hurt to have an extra brake light to tell someone to stop so i dunno what i would do
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Jul 7, 2008
#29
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #29
Third brake lights for american driven cars is 86+, not sure about SUVs and trucks though
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 7, 2008
#30
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #30
I think trucks and SUV's were exempt from the 3rd brake light standard for awhile until at least '90. My '86 GMC S-15 doesn't have one, and neither did my '89 S-10 Blazer.

Now I find myself kinda wishing we hadn't thrown away that Saleen spoiler from Frankenstang's Capri. Not a big fan of those huge wings, but without ANY kind of spoiler on a Fox hatch, it looks naked...
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#31
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #31
Will you be eventually putting a different wing on there?
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 7, 2008
#32
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #32
Meh ... dunno. If I can make the current one work for me, then no. If the current spoiler proves to be too much of a PITA because of its weird fitment, then it's getting ditched for something else, preferrably an '84-correct spoiler. (I don't want a "shelf" for my hatch. ) I would go for a GT wing because they're everywhere and cheap, but ehhhh ... nah. Wouldn't look right on a four-eye.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jul 7, 2008
#33
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #33
Looking good. It cleaned up very nicely. Can't wait to see more!
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#34
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #34
Darkwriter77 said:
Meh ... dunno. If I can make the current one work for me, then no. If the current spoiler proves to be too much of a PITA because of its weird fitment, then it's getting ditched for something else, preferrably an '84-correct spoiler. (I don't want a "shelf" for my hatch. ) I would go for a GT wing because they're everywhere and cheap, but ehhhh ... nah. Wouldn't look right on a four-eye.
Click to expand...



That's "TABLE".

It's actually quite handy.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,185
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Jul 7, 2008
#35
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #35
Saleen wings are good for hanging out down the beach with friends and needing a handly place to hold your burgers and coke
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#36
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #36
Mustang5L5 said:
Saleen wings are good for hanging out down the beach with friends and needing a handly place to hold your burgers and coke
Click to expand...

Mine gets used for many things. Drinks, tools, all kinds of stuff.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Jul 7, 2008
#37
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #37
cobra wing?

http://www.designconceptsauto.com/Images/02060_600.gif
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#38
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #38
BK_CAULEY said:
cobra wing?
Click to expand...

 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jul 7, 2008
#39
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #39
Nah - not on a four-eye. Only two choices I'd consider are a stock '84 wing, or one of those more boxy kinda wings like on a '79 Pace Car/'82 GT. I prefer subtlety. I don't want to advertise the thing as being faster than it is by slapping on Cobra or Saleen body bits, especially when I'm only rockin' about 155 horses and a CFI setup.

I caused it to rain. It's my fault. I washed the car yesterday, therefore it shall rain tonight, because the arse-end of the car is sticking out just far enough from under its carport to make spots. So, anyone else in the East Valley who's going to be upset by a downpour will have me to blame.

Trying to plan out what'd be best to do with upgrading AND fixing the car. If it does turn out to be a a head gasket, I'm definitely slapping on a set of E7's when I do it. However, I dunno if I wanna mess with the carb conversion or dual exhaust just yet. I may just drive it as-is (with E7's) to see what (if any) improvement it gives, and to get me some 2-year tags so I don't have to fart around with that for awhile. During that 2-year period, then I'll have time to do all the other stuff and get all the bugs worked out before the next smog time comes about ... which hopefully won't be a big deal, unless they become Über smog nazis in that time and even a stock-looking carb conversion won't pass inspection. By then, I'd hope to have to converted to carb with a Duraspark ignition and 5-speed, pretty much making it look like any other stock carb'ed '84, and I doubt they'd raise a fuss about duals, as long as it has 50-state legal cats and passes the sniffer.
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 7, 2008
#40
  • Jul 7, 2008
  • #40
Darkwriter77 said:
Nah - not on a four-eye. Only two choices I'd consider are a stock '84 wing, or one of those more boxy kinda wings like on a '79 Pace Car/'82 GT. I prefer subtlety. I don't want to advertise the thing as being faster than it is by slapping on Cobra or Saleen body bits, especially when I'm only rockin' about 155 horses and a CFI setup.

I caused it to rain. It's my fault. I washed the car yesterday, therefore it shall rain tonight, because the arse-end of the car is sticking out just far enough from under its carport to make spots. So, anyone else in the East Valley who's going to be upset by a downpour will have me to blame.

Trying to plan out what'd be best to do with upgrading AND fixing the car. If it does turn out to be a a head gasket, I'm definitely slapping on a set of E7's when I do it. However, I dunno if I wanna mess with the carb conversion or dual exhaust just yet. I may just drive it as-is (with E7's) to see what (if any) improvement it gives, and to get me some 2-year tags so I don't have to fart around with that for awhile. During that 2-year period, then I'll have time to do all the other stuff and get all the bugs worked out before the next smog time comes about ... which hopefully won't be a big deal, unless they become Über smog nazis in that time and even a stock-looking carb conversion won't pass inspection. By then, I'd hope to have to converted to carb with a Duraspark ignition and 5-speed, pretty much making it look like any other stock carb'ed '84, and I doubt they'd raise a fuss about duals, as long as it has 50-state legal cats and passes the sniffer.
Click to expand...

Finally some rain?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 13
Next
First Prev 2 of 13 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
678
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread 1993 LX Hatch Progress
  • Mac131
  • Aug 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
210
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
Mac131
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
441
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
853
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?