shatner saves
New Member
- Jan 13, 2004
- 583
- 0
- 0
I don't think the car is too long, but it is a disturbing trend. If it doesn't efect handling and it translates into more room, I guess it's ok.
66Satellite said:If you weed through all the bs in the bumper thread below someone stated that the 05 car needed to be this long in order not to be classified as a compact. I don't know if that is true.
That's awesome. If you only want 4 inches of trunk opening. Wouls you guys like a 3 cylinder engine so that we can shorten up the front end also? If you think the mustang has too large a butt. You definately won't like the corvette.siege said:well if its not for classification or anything, then its either for safety, trunk space, both, or they're just dumb. I think it would look so much better with a lot less overhang...
http://forums.stangnet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=17828&stc=1
Red35th said:but it's half a foot longer.
PonyGrl420 said:Its a mustang, not a station wagon its not supposed to have trunk space. Mustangs didnt have backseat space for the longest time either. And the trunk in my notch was pretty much good for nothing. Ohh well its a race car not a grocery getter.
I think it looked a lot better in the photoshop. A great soultion would be making a fast back....that would look sweet
(&) said:It IS supposed to have trunk space, because if it were not somewhat practical it would cease to exist. That's why it has a backseat too; always has and always will.
What mustang was a 2 seater?PonyGrl420 said:Its a mustang, not a station wagon its not supposed to have trunk space. Mustangs didnt have backseat space for the longest time either. And the trunk in my notch was pretty much good for nothing. Ohh well its a race car not a grocery getter.
I think it looked a lot better in the photoshop. A great soultion would be making a fast back....that would look sweet
shatner saves said:most powerful?
